| Literature DB >> 35874781 |
María B Arriaga1,2,3,4, Farina Karim5, Artur T L Queiroz2,6, Mariana Araújo-Pereira1,2,3, Beatriz Barreto-Duarte1,2,7, Caio Sales2,7, Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa8, Matilda Mazibuko5, Ginger L Milne9, Fernanda Maruri10, Carlos Henrique Serezani10, John R Koethe10, Marina C Figueiredo10, Afrânio L Kritski11, Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos12,13,14, Valeria C Rolla15, Timothy R Sterling10, Alasdair Leslie8,16, Bruno B Andrade1,2,3,7,10,17.
Abstract
Background: Oxidized lipid mediators such as eicosanoids play a central role in the inflammatory response associated with tuberculosis (TB) pathogenesis. Diabetes mellitus (DM) leads to marked changes in lipid mediators in persons with TB. However, the associations between diabetes-related changes in lipid mediators and clearance of M. tuberculosis (Mtb) among persons on anti-TB treatment (ATT) are unknown. Quantification of urinary eicosanoid metabolites can provide insights into the circulating lipid mediators involved in Mtb immune responses.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; anti-tuberculosis treatment; dysglycemia; lipid mediators; urinary eicosanoids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874781 PMCID: PMC9304990 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.919802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Characteristics of the study participants.
| Characteristics | TB-dysglycemia | TB | Dysglycemia | non-TB/non-dysglycemia | p-value | d& |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | n=69 | n=64 | n=31 | n=29 | ||
|
| 46 (66.7) | 39 (60.9) | 9 (29.0) | 8 (27.6) |
| 0.71 |
|
| 45 (32-55) | 30 (25-40) | 56.6 (44-65) | 28.4 (22.8-38.0) |
| |
|
| 0.977 | 0.25 | ||||
| White | 3 (4.3) | 4 (6.3) | 3 (9.7) | 2 (6.9) | ||
| Black | 53 (76.8) | 44 (68.8) | 22 (71.0) | 22 (75.9) | ||
|
| 13 (18.8) | 16 (25.0) | 6 (19.4) | 5 (17.2) | ||
|
| 9 (13) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | NA | |
|
| 22 (31.9) | 19 (29.7) | 2 (6.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| 0.67 |
|
| 9 (40.9) | 6 (31.6) | 2 (6.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0.274 | 0.70 |
|
| 21.4 (18.5-24.4) | 20.6 (18.5-22.2) | 30.3 (27.8-34.7) | 25.5 (20.6-29.4) |
| 0.34 |
|
| 6.5 (6.0-9.6) | 5.4 (5.2-5.5) | 7.1 (5.9-9.4) | 5.2 (4.9-5.4) |
| 0.47 |
|
| NA | |||||
| Diabetes | 37 (53.6%) | 0 (0) | 17 (54.8) | 0 (0) | ||
| Prediabetes | 32 (46.4) | 0 (0) | 14 (45.2) | 0 (0) | ||
| Normoglycemia | 0 (0) | 64 (100) | 0 (0) | 29 (100) | ||
|
| 30 (43.5) | 30 (46.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.694 | 0.07 |
|
| 31 (44.9) | 35 (54.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.260 | 0.06 |
|
| 49 (71.0) | 40 (62.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.297 | 0.15 |
|
| ||||||
| Cough | 66 (95.7) | 61 (95.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.925 | 0.07 |
| Fever | 41 (59.4) | 37 (57.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.850 | 0.48 |
| Weight loss | 61 (88.4) | 49 (76.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.071 |
|
| Fatigue | 50 (72.5) | 44 (68.8) | 1 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.638 | 0.51 |
| Night sweats | 40 (58.0) | 47 (73.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.060 | 0.63 |
| Chest pain | 41 (59.4) | 46 (71.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.131 | 0.65 |
Data represents no, (%) or median and interquartile range (IQR) and were compared using the Fisher’s exact test or Chi-squared (categorical variables) and Kruskal-Wallis (quantitative variables).
Effect sizes by Cohen’s d (26).
† Hypoglycemic agents: Metformin and insulin.
No significant differences between TB dysglycemia vs. TB groups (p=0.852).
*The percentages were calculated with the number of individuals with HIV co-infection.
**Comparison of AFB, culture, cavities on chest x-ray and symptoms of TB were performed between TB-dysglycemic and TB cases. p-value in bold were statistically significant.
BMI, Body Mass Index; TB, Tuberculosis; AFB, acid-fast bacilli; ART, antiretroviral therapy; DM, diabetes; PDM, prediabetes; NA, Not applicable.
Figure 1Comparison of the distribution of urinary eicosanoids between the study groups. Box plot depicting the distribution of eicosanoids (median and interquartile range) among TB-dysglycemia, TB, dysglycemic patients and non-TB/non-dysglycemia individuals at each timepoint. Groups were compared using Kruskal Wallis (for four groups) and Mann Whitney tests (for two groups). Individuals without TB (Dysglycemia and non-TB/non-dysglycemia groups) had only two visits (baseline and month 6). TB, tuberculosis; PGE-M, major urinary PGE2 metabolite; PGD-M, major urinary PGD2 metabolite; PGI-M, 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1α (PGI2 Metabolite); 11dTxB2, 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (TxB2 urinary metabolite); TN-E, tetranor-PGE1 (urinary PGE2 metabolite); LTE4, Leukotriene E4.
Figure 2Urinary eicosanoids levels through of study timepoints. Distribution of eicosanoids (each point represents group medians) in TB-dysglycemia, TB, dysglycemia and non-TB/non-dysglycemia groups across study visits. Timepoints were compared using Friedman or Wilcoxon test (when corresponding). Individuals without TB (Dysglycemia and non-TB/non-dysglycemia groups) had only two visits (baseline and month 6). Details of central dispersion and tendency of the data are shown in the Table S2. TB, tuberculosis; PGE-M, major urinary PGE2 metabolite; PGD-M, major urinary PGD2 metabolite; PGI-M, 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1α (PGI2 Metabolite); 11dTxB2, 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (TxB2 urinary metabolite); TN-E, tetranor-PGE1 (urinary PGE2 metabolite); LTE4, Leukotriene E4.
Figure 3(A) Spearman correlation analysis plots between HbA1c (%) and TB-dysglycemia, TB, dysglycemic patients and non-TB/non-dysglycemia individuals at baseline. Significant correlations (p< 0.05) are represented in red bars. (B) Network analysis of eicosanoids in TB and TB-dysglycemic patients in the baseline, month 2 (M2) and month 6 (M6) among patient from Brazil and South Africa. Red solid lines: positive significant correlations (Spearman correlation). (C) Network densities of each bootstrap were calculated for each study group and timepoint as described in Methods. TB, tuberculosis; Dys, dysglycemia; PGE-M, major urinary PGE2 metabolite; PGD-M, major urinary PGD2 metabolite; PGIõ-M, 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1α (PGI2 Metabolite); 11dTxB2, 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (TxB2 urinary metabolite); TN-E, tetranor-PGE1 (urinary PGE2 metabolite); LTE4, Leukotriene E4.
Figure 4Urinary eicosanoid levels and tuberculosis severity. Scatter plot depicting the distribution of eicosanoids (median and interquartile range) among TB-Dysglycemia and TB cases with cavitation (CAV+) and without cavitation (CAV-) at baseline. Groups were compared using Kruskal Wallis test. Only statistically significant differences are shown. PGE-M, major urinary PGE2 metabolite; PGD-M, major urinary PGD2 metabolite; PGI-M, 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1α (PGI2 Metabolite); 11dTxB2, 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (TxB2 urinary metabolite); TN-E, tetranor-PGE1 (urinary PGE2 metabolite); LTE4, Leukotriene E4.
Figure 5Multinomial logistic regression, adjusted for age (years), sex (male), country, PGD, PGIM, TNE, 11dTxB2, LTE4 and BMI assessed at baseline with the TB-dysglycemia condition. OR, Odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals; PGE-M, major urinary PGE2 metabolite; PGD-M, major urinary PGD2 metabolite; PGI-M, 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1α (PGI2 Metabolite); 11dTxB2, 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (TxB2 urinary metabolite); TN-E, tetranor-PGE1 (urinary PGE2 metabolite); LTE4, Leukotriene E4.