| Literature DB >> 35874590 |
Tariq O Abbas1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Introduction: Identifying key anatomical features of the hypospadiac penis is crucial to better understanding this pathology and guiding surgical reconstruction plans, thereby achieving superior functional and cosmetic outcomes. Objective: To Assess the feasibility and precision of penile ultrasonography (PUG) in determining key structural features for hypospadias cases (including distal extent of the spongiosal component of the urethral plate, to elucidate the healing process following tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty). Patients andEntities:
Keywords: evaluation; hypospadias; penile anatomical disorders; ultrasound; urethral hypoplasia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874590 PMCID: PMC9299257 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.932201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
FIGURE 1(A–C) Diagram representing key anatomical landmarks. (A) Illustration showing the different anatomical landmarks used to define urethral hypoplasia. (B) Two transverse images are captured: one at the peno-scrotal junction and the other midway between the hypospadias meatus and B-B line. (C) Longitudinal sagittal imaging over the midline of the penile shaft with two metal landmarks at the B-B line and hypospadiac meatus.
General and penile anthropometric values of study patients.
| Distal penile | Mid penile | Proximal penile | Test statistic value | ||
| Number | 17 | 5 | 3 | ||
| Age (months) | 17 (range from 8 to 39) | ||||
| POST score | 1.1 ± 0.12 | 0.9 ± 0.22 | 0.7 ± 0.38 | ANOVA | 0.003 |
| Curvatures (>20) | 5/17 | 4/5 | 3/3 | χ2 = 4.14 | 0.126 |
| Curvature degrees ( | 30 ± 10 | 40 ± 5 | 60 ± 15 | ANOVA | <0.0001 |
| Starched penile length (mm) | 57 ± 12 | 52 ± 9 | 49 ± 10 | ANOVA | 0.437 |
The extent of the urethral hypoplasia proximal to the hypospadias meatal opening determined using either physical examination, PUG, and intraoperatively.
| Distal penile | Mid penile | Proximal penile | Test statistic value | ||
| By physical exam | 3 ± 3 | 4 ± 4 | 5 ± 2 | ANOVA | 0.547 |
| Using PUG | 3 ± 3 | 6 ± 4 | 10 ± 2 | ANOVA | 0.004 |
| Intraoperatively | 4 ± 3 | 7 ± 5 | 9 ± 2 | ANOVA | 0.042 |
FIGURE 2Images of hypospadias cases with their corresponding POST values (left column) and subsequent PUG images (middle column) with annotations shown in the third column (right). To better define the extent of urethral under-development, we defined urethral hypoplasia as the distance from the spongiosal bifurcation to the hypospadias meatus, whereas urethral defect was defined as the distance from the spongiosal bifurcation to the B-B line. We observed that a longer urethral defect was detected in more severe cases of hypospadias, when stratified according to meatal position, and that longer urethral defect correlated with lower POST values (p = 0.001).