| Literature DB >> 35874541 |
Elodie Lamonzie1,2, Fanny Vaillant1,2, Emma Abell1,2, Sabine Charron1, Dounia El Hamrani1,2, Bruno Quesson1,2, Fabien Brette1,2.
Abstract
MRI is widely used in cardiology to characterize the structure and function of the heart. Currently, gadolinium-based contrast agents are widely used to improve sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic images. Recently, Manganese, a calcium analogue, has emerged as a complementary contrast agent with the potential to reveal remaining viable cells within altered tissue. Imaging applications may be limited by substantial toxicity of manganese. Indeed, cardiac safety of manganese is not yet comprehensively assessed. In this study we investigated the effect of MnCl2 (1-100 µM) on cardiac function. Hemodynamic function was determined ex vivo using an isolated working rat heart preparation. HL-1 cardiac myocytes were used to investigate cell viability (calcein AM) and calcium cycling (Cal-520 a.m.). Rat ventricular cardiomyocytes were dissociated by enzymatic digestion. Action potentials and calcium currents were recorded using the patch clamp technique. MRI experiments were performed at 1.5T on formalin-fixed rat hearts, previously perfused with MnCl2. MnCl2 perfusion from 1 up to 100 µM in isolated working hearts did not alter left ventricular hemodynamic parameters. Contractility and relaxation index were not altered up to 50 µM MnCl2. In HL-1 cardiac myocytes, incubation with increasing concentrations of MnCl2 did not impact cell viability. The amplitude of the calcium transients were significantly reduced at 50 and 100 µM MnCl2. In freshly isolated ventricular myocytes, action potential duration at 20, 50 and 90% of repolarization were not modified up to 10 µM of MnCl2. L-type calcium current amplitude was significantly decreased by 50 and 100 µM of MnCl2. MRI on heart perfused with 25 and 100 µM of MnCl2 showed a dose dependent decrease in the T1 relaxation time. In conclusion, our results show that low concentrations of MnCl2 (up to 25 µM) can be used as a contrast agent in MRI, without significant impact on cardiac hemodynamic or electrophysiology parameters.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; calcium; cardiac function; electrophysiology; manganese; toxicity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874541 PMCID: PMC9302587 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.952043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
FIGURE 1Effects of MnCl2 on left ventricle hemodynamic properties of rat hearts perfused in working mode. (A) Perfusion protocol for working hearts with or without MnCl2 (B) dP/dtmax (C) dP/dtmin of left ventricle (D) heart rate (E) aortic flow depending on time for the control group (n = 5) (blue dots) and the group MnCl2 (n = 6) (red dots). *p < 0.05 vs. baseline of the same group. # p < 0.05 vs. same condition of control group.
Hemodynamic parameters of isolated working rat hearts perfused in the control group and MnCl2 group.
| – | Baseline | 1 µM | 10 µM | 25 µM | 50 µM | 100 µM | Wash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 110 ± 3 | 113 ± 2 | 111 ± 2 | 109 ± 3 | 109 ± 3 | 107 ± 3 | 107 ± 2 |
|
| 106 ± 3 | 109 ± 3 | 108 ± 3 * | 108 ± 3 | 105 ± 3 | 99 ± 4 | 105 ± 5 | |
|
|
| 3.67 ± 0.49 | 3.45 ± 0.40 | 3.56 ± 0.49 | 3.72 ± 0.51 | 3.72 ± 0.53 | 3.89 ± 0.57 | 3.94 ± 0.59 |
|
| 4.67 ± 0.92 | 4.39 ± 0.76 | 4.89 ± 0.86 | 5.28 ± 0.72 | 5.22 ± 0.76 | 6.11 ± 0.48 | 5 ± 0.89 | |
|
|
| 7.78 ± 0.8 | 7.83 ± 0.72 | 9.28 ± 0.64 | 10 ± 1.06 | 9.56 ± 0.95 | 10.17 ± 0.99 | 9.83 ± 1.40 |
|
| 7.95 ± 0.85 | 7.83 ± 0.72 | 9.28 ± 0.64 | 10 ± 1.06 | 9.56 ± 0.95 | 10.17 ± 0.99 | 9.22 ± 1.5 | |
|
|
| 107 ± 3 | 110 ± 2 | 107 ± 2 | 106 ± 3 | 106 ± 3 | 103 ± 3 | 103 ± 2 |
|
| 101 ± 3 | 104 ± 3 | 103 ± 3 | 103 ± 3 | 100 ± 3 | 93 ± 4 | 99 ± 5 | |
|
|
| 76.14 ± 5.65 | 75.76 ± 4.09 | 73.15 ± 8.19 | 71.33 ± 10.43 | 68.99 ± 11.4 | 66.64 ± 13.05 | 67.34 ± 11.15 |
|
| 73.3 ± 13.53 | 74.8 ± 10.91 | 70.66 ± 10.55 | 64.76 ± 10.51 | 57.78 ± 12.11 | 47.94 ± 10.86 | 58.4 ± 16.67 | |
|
|
| 19.12 ± 1.38 | 19.22 ± 1.37 | 18.97 ± 1.24 | 18.81 ± 1.08 | 18.46 ± 1.06 | 18.21 ± 1.17 | 17.24 ± 1.58 |
|
| 19.93 ± 2.17 | 20.51 ± 2.18 | 20.00 ± 2.38 | 18.92 ± 2.36 | 18.19 ± 2.55 | 17.99 ± 2.88 | 19.15 ± 2.40 | |
|
|
| 0.267 ± 0.011 | 0.268 ± 0.012 | 0.256 ± 0.014 | 0.25 ± 0.018 | 0.245 ± 0.019 | 0.236 ± 0.02 | 0.225 ± 0.016 |
|
| 0.255 ± 0.019 | 0.262 ± 0.018 | 0.251 ± 0.024 | 0.237 ± 0.024 | 0.217 ± 0.027 | 0.176 ± 0.022 ** | 0.208 ± 0.035 | |
|
|
| 17.99 ± 0.39 | 18.39 ± 0.50 | 17.49 ± 1.07 | 16.84 ± 1.41 | 16.26 ± 1.45 | 15.47 ± 1.61 | 15.79 ± 1.37 |
|
| 16.50 ± 1.37 | 17.23 ± 0.95 | 16.17 ± 1.07 | 14.72 ± 0.96 | 12.71 ± 1.06 * | 9.92 ± 0.99 * | 12.96 ± 1.76 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. baseline of the same group. LVSPmax, maximum left ventricular systolic pressure; LVPmin, minimal left ventricular pressure; LVeDP, left ventricular end diastolic pressure; LVDP, left ventricular developed pressure; HR, heart rate; SV, stroke volume.
Bold Values as described in the protocol (Figure 1A).
FIGURE 2Effect of MnCl2 on the cell viability of HL-1 cells. (A) Representative image of the calcein fluorescence in HL-1 cells in control (left) and 100 µM MnCl2 (right) condition. (B) Total fluorescence of calcein expressed par µm2 between the control condition and the different MnCl2 concentrations (n = 8). ns, no significant.
FIGURE 3Variation of calcium transients induced by MnCl2 in HL-1 (A) Representative plots of calcium transients in HL-1 observed on control solution (left) and at 100 µM of MnCl2 (right). (B) Frequency (C) time of peak (D) time at 50% of the relaxation (T50) and (E) amplitude of calcium transients depending on different conditions (N = 3, n = 15). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 4Effects of MnCl2 on calcium currents of rat ventricular cardiomyocytes (A) Representative plots of calcium currents in control condition (blue line) and at 50 µM (light red line) and at 100 µM (dark red line) of MnCl2 (the capacitance of the cell is 107 pF) (B) Calcium current density in depending on different conditions. N = 3, n = 11. ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 5Effects of MnCl2 on action potentials of rat ventricular cardiomyocytes (A) Representative plots of action potentials in control condition and at 25, 50 and 100 µM MnCl2 (B) Resting membrane potential (C) dV/dtmax (D) amplitude of peak (E) APD20 (F) APD50 and (G) APD90 depending on different conditions (N = 4; n = 8). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 6Effect of MnCl2 on T1 longitudinal relaxation time of myocardial tissue at 1.5T MRI. (A) Typical MR images of perfused rat hearts (mid-ventricular short-axis view) (B) T1 relaxation time of control condition (N = 4) compared to 25 µM (N = 4) and 100 µM (N = 4) of MnCl2. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001.