| Literature DB >> 35874492 |
Neus Font-Porterias1, Madeline G McNelis2, David Comas1, Leslea J Hlusko2.
Abstract
Synopsis: The ectodysplasin pathway has been a target of evolution repeatedly. Genetic variation in the key genes of this pathway (EDA, EDAR, and EDARADD) results in a rich source of pleiotropic effects across ectodermally-derived structures, including teeth, hair, sweat glands, and mammary glands. In addition, a non-canonical Wnt pathway has a very similar functional role, making variation in the WNT10A gene also of evolutionary significance. The adaptation of mammals to aquatic environments has occurred independently in at least 4 orders, whose species occupy a wide geographic range (from equatorial to polar regions) and exhibit great phenotypic variation in ectodermally-derived structures, including the presence or absence of fur and extreme lactational strategies. The role of the ectodysplasin pathway in the adaptation to aquatic environments has been never explored in mammalian species. In the present study, we analyze the genetic variation in orthologous coding sequences from EDA, EDAR, EDARADD, and WNT10A genes together with ectodermally-derived phenotypic variation from 34 aquatic and non-aquatic mammalian species to assess signals of positive selection, gene-trait coevolution, and genetic convergence. Our study reveals strong evidence of positive selection in a proportion of coding sites in EDA and EDAR genes in 3 endangered aquatic mammals (the Hawaiian monk seal, the Yangtze finless porpoise, and the sea otter). We hypothesize functional implications potentially related to the adaptation to the low-latitude aquatic environment in the Hawaiian monk seal and the freshwater in the Yangtze finless porpoise. The signal in the sea otter is likely the result of an increased genetic drift after an intense bottleneck and reduction of genetic diversity. Besides positive selection, we have not detected robust signals of gene-trait coevolution or convergent amino acid shifts in the ectodysplasin pathway associated with shared phenotypic traits among aquatic mammals. This study provides new evidence of the evolutionary role of the ectodysplasin pathway and encourages further investigation, including functional studies, to fully resolve its relationship with mammalian aquatic adaptation. Spanish: La vía de la ectodisplasina ha sido objeto de la evolución repetidamente. La variación genética en los principales genes de esta vía (EDA, EDAR y EDARADD) da como resultado una gran diversidad de efectos pleiotrópicos en las estructuras derivadas del ectodermo, incluidos los dientes, el cabello, las glándulas sudoríparas y las glándulas mamarias. Además, una vía wnt no canónica tiene un papel funcional muy similar, por lo que la variación en el gen WNT10A también tiene importancia evolutiva. La adaptación de los mamíferos a los entornes acuáticos se ha producido de forma independiente en al menos cuatro órdenes, cuyas especies ocupan un amplio rango geográfico (desde regiones ecuatoriales a polares) y presentan una gran variación fenotípica en las estructuras derivadas del ectodermo, incluyendo la presencia o ausencia de pelaje y estrategias de lactancia muy diferentes. El papel de la vía de la ectodisplasina en la adaptación a entornos acuáticos no se ha explorado nunca en especies de mamíferos. En este estudio, analizamos la variación genética en las secuencias codificantes ortólogas de los genes EDA, EDAR, EDARADD y WNT10A junto con la variación fenotípica derivada del ectodermo de 34 especies de mamíferos acuáticos y no acuáticos para evaluar señales de selección positiva, coevolución gen-rasgo y convergencia genética. Nuestro estudio revela señales de selección positiva en regiones de las secuencias codificantes de los genes EDA y EDAR en tres mamíferos acuáticos en peligro de extinción (la foca monje de Hawái, la marsopa lisa y la nutria marina). Estas señales podrían tener implicaciones funcionales potencialmente relacionadas con la adaptación al entorno acuático de baja latitud en la foca monje de Hawái y el agua dulce en la marsopa lisa. La señal en la nutria marina es probablemente el resultado de una mayor deriva genética tras un intenso un cuello de botella y una reducción de la diversidad genética. A parte de selección positiva, no hemos detectado señales sólidas de coevolución gen-rasgo o cambios convergentes de aminoácidos en la vía de la ectodisplasina asociados a rasgos fenotípicos compartidos entre mamíferos acuáticos. Este estudio proporciona nuevas evidencias del papel evolutivo de la vía de la ectodisplasina y quiere promover futuras investigaciones con estudios funcionales para acabar de resolver la relación de esta vía con la adaptación acuática de los mamíferos.Entities:
Keywords: Positive selection; aquatic adaptation; ectodysplasin pathway; endangered mammals
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874492 PMCID: PMC9299678 DOI: 10.1093/iob/obac018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Org Biol ISSN: 2517-4843
List of aquatic and non-aquatic mammal species with their taxonomic classification and phenotypic trait values. Duration of lactation in days, maximum number of adult teeth, mean number of deciduous teeth, and ear size (maximum external ear length divided by the crown-rump length).
| Group | Family | Common name | Scientific name | Duration of lactation | Adult teeth | Deciduous teeth | Ear size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnipeds | Odobenidae | Pacific Walrus |
| 730 | 26 | 28 | 0 |
| Otariidae | Northern fur seal |
| 106.5 | 37 | 22 | 0.22 | |
| Steller sea lion |
| 349.5 | 40 | 24 | 0.14 | ||
| California sea lion |
| 274 | 42 | 0 | 0.14 | ||
| Phocidae | Grey seal |
| 16 | 34 | 0 | 0 | |
| Harbor or common seal |
| 35 | 34 | 26 | 0 | ||
| Weddell seal |
| 38.5 | 34 | 32 | 0 | ||
| Southern elephant seal |
| 23 | 34 | 16 | 0 | ||
| Hawaiian monk seal |
| 42 | 32 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Cetaceans | Physteridae | Sperm whale |
| 897.5 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| Monodontidae | Beluga whale |
| 639 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Narwhal |
| 547.5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Delphinoidea, Phocaenidae | Vaquita |
| 274 | 108 | 0 | 0 | |
| Yangtze finless porpoise |
| 183 | 108 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Lipotidae | Baiji (Chinese river dolphin) |
| 365.5 | 144 | 0 | 0 | |
| Delphinidae | Common bottlenose dolphin |
| 1642.5 | 104 | 0 | 0 | |
| Killer whale |
| 547.5 | 40 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Long-finned pilot whale |
| 671 | 44 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Pacific-whitesided dolphin |
| 198.5 | 180 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Balaenopteridae | Blue whale |
| 198.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Common minke whale |
| 167.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Otters | Mustelidae | North American River otter |
| 105.5 | 38 | 26 | 0.12 |
| Sea otter |
| 183 | 38 | 26 | 0.14 | ||
| Manatee | Tichechidae | Florida manatee |
| 560 | 28 | 4 | 0 |
| Non-aquatic | Canidae | Dog |
| 70 | 42 | 28 | 0.49 |
| Equidae | Horse |
| 168 | 42 | 24 | 0.54 | |
| Bovidae | Goat |
| 167 | 32 | 20 | 0.62 | |
| Sheep |
| 165 | 32 | 20 | 0.44 | ||
| Muridae | House mouse |
| 23 | 16 | 0 | 0.57 | |
| Brown rat |
| 42 | 16 | 0 | 0.43 | ||
| Suidae | Wild boar |
| 91.5 | 40 | 28 | 0.55 | |
| Camelidae | Alpaca |
| 91 | 32 | 20 | 0.61 | |
| Elephantidae | African savanna elephant |
| 1752 | 12 | 14 | 0.9 | |
| Mustelidae | Stoat |
| 61 | 38 | 28 | 0.25 |
The ear/crown-rump length ratio was estimated from three photographs of the animal from lateral view. We measured the ear and cranial lengths and then report the mean of this ratio in Table 1. Each photograph was from a different female individual of the species to account for differences in sexual dimorphism.
(Riet-Sapriza, 2019).
(Oftedal, 1997).
(Hay, 1984).
(Taylor ).
(Chen ).
(Nowak and Walker, 2003).
(West ).
(SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, 2021).
(Ferrero and Walker, 1996).
(Dronkert-Egnew, 1991).
(Chinn ).
(Physiological Ecology and Bioenergetics Lab, 2021).
(Mech, Barber-Meyer and Erb, 2016).
(Oftedal, Hintz and Schryver, 1983).
(Findeisen ).
(Berger, Mikolayunas and Thomas, 2010).
(König and Markl, 1987).
(Miller, 1911).
(Marsan and Mattioli, 2013).
(Tibary ).
(Smith and Buss, 1973).
(Braun, 1994).
(Kryukova, 2012).
(Hillson, 2005, p. 200).
(Extension Foundation. US Department of Agriculture, 2019).
(Aalderink ).
(Marine Mammal Anatomy & Pathology Library, 2018).
(Kierdorf ).
(Kahle ).
(Thomas and Terhune, 2009).
(Briggs, 1974).
(Timm-Davis, DeWitt and Marshall, 2015).
(He, Friede and Kiliaridis, 2002).
Fig. 1(A) Common tree exhibiting evolutionary relationships between species included in the dataset. Aquatic and semi aquatic species branches colored in blue, terrestrial species colored in orange. (B) Divergence times (in million years) noted in black. (C) Convergent traits between species marked with green bars.
Branches with positively selected sites for each gene. Branch-site in codeml PAML and aBSREL in HyPhy results are shown. LRT between the alternative and null models. Parameter estimates of the alternative model showing the dN/dS (ω) and proportion (p) of sites under each site class.
| Branch-site model in codeml PAML | aBSREL in HyPhy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Branch | LRT and | Parameter estimates | LRT and | Parameter estimates |
|
| Hawaiian monk seal | 140.154 ( | p0 = 0.861, p1 = 0.044, p2a = 0.09, p2b = 0.005; ω0 = 0.02, ω1 = 1, ω2 = 730.1 | 82.073 ( | ω1 = 0.228 (93.1%); ω2 = 323 (6.9%) |
|
| Sea otter | 27.357 ( | p0 = 0.844, p1 = 0.101, p2a = 0.05, p2b = 0.006; ω0 = 0.005, ω1 = 1, ω2 = 999 | 42.953 ( | ω1 = 0.168 (93.9%); ω2 = 100,000 (6.1%) |
|
| Yangtze finless porpoise | 128.873 ( | p0 = 0.859, p1 = 0.051, p2a = 0.085, p2b = 0.005; ω0 = 0.067, ω1 = 1, ω2 = 999 | 161.5480 ( | ω1 = 1.00 (90.6%); ω2 = 100,000 (9.4%) |
Analysis of the amino acid substitutions in positively selected sites. Evidence of positive selection from BEB posterior probabilities in branch-site PAML and P-values from FEL HyPhy analysis. The functional impact of the substitutions was assessed using four scores (PROVEAN, MAPP, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) and considered deleterious when the prediction was supported by at least three predictions. See extended results in Table S2. Amino acid substitutions position relative to the human protein sequence.
| A. | |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| A134R | 1.000 | 0.016 | Deleterious |
| L136R | 1.000 | 0.001 | Neutral |
| N137S | 1.000 | 0.014 | Deleterious |
| D142P | 1.000 | 0.005 | Neutral |
| P145N | 1.000 | <0.001 | Neutral |
| V154E | 1.000 | 0.008 | Neutral |
| S162V | 0.999 | 0.012 | Neutral |
| B. | |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| E148L | 0.999 | 0.013 | Neutral |
| R152F | 0.995 | 0.004 | Neutral |
| C. | |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| H224A | 0.991 | <0.001 | Neutral |
| G226W | 0.992 | 0.002 | Neutral |
| K227A | 1.000 | 0.015 | Deleterious |
| V229G | 0.984 | 0.002 | Neutral |
| E230R | 1.000 | <0.001 | Deleterious |
| S234T | 0.995 | 0.003 | Neutral |
| K235P | 0.980 | 0.022 | Neutral |
| D236P | 0.999 | <0.001 | Neutral |
| E237R | 1.000 | 0.024 | Neutral |
| E238L | 1.000 | <0.001 | Deleterious |
| K239A | 1.000 | 0.018 | Deleterious |
| K240P | 1.000 | <0.001 | Neutral |
| E241V | 0.974 | 0.011 | Neutral |
Fig. 2EDA protein multiple sequence alignment around the region with positively selected sites. Top diagram shows EDA protein domains (He et al. 2018). Aquatic mammals are shown within gray boxes and the aquatic species with positively selected sites are shown in the bottom within a dashed black box. Selected sites in the Hawaiian monk seal and sea otter are in bold and shadowed in green and yellow, respectively. Amino acid substitutions predicted to have a functional impact are marked with an asterisk. Consensus furin cleavage site (Chen et al. 2001) is highlighted with a black box within the alignment. The position for each selection site is given relative to the human protein sequence.
Fig. 3Comparative analysis of the 3D structure of the human (A) and Hawaiian monk seal (B) EDA proteins, with a focus on the positively selected sites region. Color scale depicts relative accessible surface area estimations per residue. Dashed lines represent non-covalent interactions between the residues in 134 and 137 positions and nearby sites.
Fig. 4EDAR protein multiple sequence alignment around the region with positively selected sites. Top diagram shows EDAR protein domains (Sadier et al. 2014). Aquatic mammals are shown within gray boxes and the aquatic species with positively selected sites is shown in the bottom within a dashed black box. Selected sites in the Yangtze finless porpoise are in bold and shadowed in blue. Amino acid substitutions predicted to have a functional impact are marked with an asterisk. The position for each selection site is given relative to the human protein sequence.
Phylogenetically controlled regression analyses between root-to-tip ω ratios and a set of continuous traits. Tests performed including all species, only aquatic (with and without otters) and only terrestrial. For each analysis, t-stat, P-value and slope are shown. NA values are shown when less than three species were available for the regression analysis.
| All | Non-aquatic | Aquatic | Aquatic without otters | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trait | Gene | t-stat |
| slope | t-stat |
| slope | t-stat |
| slope | t-stat |
| slope |
| Duration of lactation |
| 0.465 | 0.646 | 0.122 | –0.061 | 0.953 | –0.011 | 0.494 | 0.629 | 0.233 | 0.483 | 0.637 | 0.251 |
|
| 0.057 | 0.955 | 0.221 | 1.804 | 0.109 | 0.225 | 0.012 | 0.991 | 0.403 | 0.017 | 0.987 | 0.675 | |
|
| –1.865 | 0.076 | –2.749 | –0.916 | 0.395 | –0.524 | –1.805 | 0.093 | –4.582 | –1.739 | 0.106 | –4.595 | |
|
| 0.288 | 0.775 | 0.146 | 0.897 | 0.396 | 0.218 | –0.154 | 0.879 | –0.165 | –0.400 | 0.694 | –0.524 | |
| Number of adult teeth |
| –0.457 | 0.652 | –0.237 | –1.099 | 0.304 | –0.066 | –0.509 | 0.619 | –0.583 | –0.519 | 0.613 | –0.679 |
|
| 0.266 | 0.792 | 0.113 | 0.581 | 0.577 | 0.030 | 0.622 | 0.543 | 2.541 | 0.630 | 0.539 | 2.964 | |
|
| 0.783 | 0.442 | 1.372 | –0.513 | 0.626 | –0.148 | 1.030 | 0.322 | 3.346 | 0.993 | 0.341 | 3.364 | |
|
| –0.033 | 0.973 | –0.016 | –1.718 | 0.124 | –0.132 | 0.199 | 0.844 | 0.214 | 0.222 | 0.827 | 0.297 | |
| Number of deciduous teeth |
| –0.375 | 0.714 | –0.040 | –0.330 | 0.752 | –0.014 | –0.550 | 0.611 | –0.178 | –1.176 | 0.324 | –0.477 |
|
| –0.803 | 0.436 | –0.494 | –1.224 | 0.267 | –0.564 | –0.314 | 0.764 | –0.287 | 0.013 | 0.990 | 0.018 | |
|
| –0.614 | 0.556 | –0.138 | –0.243 | 0.819 | –0.063 | –0.773 | 0.520 | –0.501 | –0.446 | 0.733 | –0.421 | |
|
| –0.610 | 0.552 | –0.076 | –1.294 | 0.243 | –0.072 | –1.024 | 0.346 | –0.361 | –1.722 | 0.160 | –0.960 | |
| Ear/crown-rump length ratio |
| –0.154 | 0.880 | –0.019 | –0.072 | 0.945 | –0.007 | –0.153 | 0.904 | –0.083 | NA | NA | NA |
|
| –0.392 | 0.701 | –0.048 | –0.466 | 0.654 | –0.037 | –0.594 | 0.595 | –1.240 | –0.465 | 0.723 | –1.419 | |
|
| 2.572 |
| 1.181 | 1.485 | 0.188 | 0.751 | –0.565 | 0.673 | –0.547 | NA | NA | NA | |
|
| –0.549 | 0.592 | –0.126 | 0.180 | 0.862 | 0.022 | 0.093 | 0.931 | 0.099 | 0.185 | 0.883 | 2.585 | |