| Literature DB >> 35874370 |
Xintian Li1, Peng Peng2.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the politics, economy, and society of the world, which has dealt the most severe blow to the hospitality industry. Meanwhile, the pandemic and government control policies have brought high psychological pressure to hospitality front-line employees, resulting in emotional exhaustion. As a part of burnout syndrome, emotional exhaustion poses a threat to employees' mental health, career sustainability, and well-being. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to investigate the curb effectiveness of inclusive leadership on emotional exhaustion and to explore the mediation roles of ethical climate and psychological safety between them. Time-lagged data were collected from 65 teams and 358 hospitality front-line employees working in Chinese hotels in two stages with a one-month gap. This research verified that inclusive leadership has a negative impact on emotional exhaustion both indirectly through the mediation roles of ethical climate and psychological safety. And the ethical climate and psychological safety played partial mediation roles between inclusive leadership and emotional exhaustion. In theory, the findings explored the dual mediation mechanism of the inhibitory effect of inclusive leadership on emotional exhaustion. In practice, we provided the training and correct guidance to develop inclusive leadership for hotel enterprises and to resolve the emotional exhaustion of employees, which can enhance sustainability in careers.Entities:
Keywords: caring ethical climate; emotional exhaustion; hospitality frontline employees; inclusive leadership; psychological safety
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874370 PMCID: PMC9301071 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Descriptive statistics and correlations for the study variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Gender | 0.57 | 0.68 | – | – | 1 | |||||||
| 2. | Age | 26.55 | 7.92 | – | – | 0.08 | 1 | ||||||
| 3. | Educational level | 2.52 | 0.61 | – | – | 0.11 | 0.10 | 1 | |||||
| 4. | Organizational tenure | 2.76 | 0.92 | – | – | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 1 | ||||
| 5. | Inclusive Leadership | 3.89 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.91 | 0.17 | 0.18 | −0.12 | 0.31 | 1 | |||
| 6. | Psychological Safety | 3.92 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.93 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.43 | 1 | ||
| 7. | Caring Ethical Climate | 3.27 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.47 | 0.21 | 1 | |
| 8. | Emotional Exhaustion | 3.95 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.87 | 0.18 | 0.02 | −0.67 | 0.29 | −0.41 | −0.51 | −0.45 | 1 |
Gender (0 = female, 1 = male), age (1 = less than 20, 2 = 21–30, 3 = 31–40, 4 = more than 40), educational level (1 = high school and below 2 = college, 3 = bachelor’s, 4 = master’s); N = 358.
p < 0.01.
Confirmatory factor analyses results.
| Model |
| df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four-factor model | 325.384 | 209 | 1.557 | 0.917 | 0.921 | 0.052 |
| Three-factor model | 453.872 | 212 | 2.141 | 0.877 | 0.882 | 0.069 |
| Three-factor model | 467.121 | 212 | 2.203 | 0.869 | 0.875 | 0.072 |
| Two-factor model | 565.727 | 214 | 2.643 | 0.785 | 0.795 | 0.095 |
| Single factor model | 675.917 | 215 | 3.144 | 0.691 | 0.617 | 0.159 |
In the four models, there is no relationship between all variables measured.
Merging inclusive leadership and caring ethical climate into a potential factor.
Merging inclusive leadership and psychological safety into a potential factor.
Merging inclusive leadership, psychological safety, and caring ethical climate into a potential factor.
Merging all variables into a potential factor.
Figure 1Analysis model. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. χ2 = 378.652 (df = 223); χ2/df = 1.698, GFI = 0.903, NFI = 0.924, RMSEA = 0.043, TLI = 0.927, CFI = 0.932.
The path analysis results.
| Paths | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct effects | Path coefficient | Result | |
| Inclusive leadership →emotional exhaustion (H1) | −0.159** | 3.120 | Accept |
| Inclusive leadership →caring ethical climate (H2) | 0.221*** | 4.652 | Accept |
| caring ethical climate →emotional exhaustion (H3) | −0.115* | 1.979 | Accept |
| Inclusive leadership →psychological safety (H5) | 0.207** | 4.327 | Accept |
| Psychological safety →emotional exhaustion (H6) | −0.197** | 2.675 | Accept |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
The mediating effect of the model.
| Mediating effects | Indirect | BC (95% CI) | Degree of mediation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inclusive leadership →caring ethical climate →emotional exhaustion (H4) | 0.131** | [0.062, 0.184] | Partial mediation |
| Inclusive leadership →psychological safety →emotional exhaustion (H7) | 0.172** | [0.025, 0.138] | Partial mediation |
**p < 0.01.