| Literature DB >> 35874299 |
Francesco Boschin1,2, Andrea Columbu3, Vincenzo Spagnolo1,2, Jacopo Crezzini1,2, Jean-Jacques Bahain4, Christophe FalguèRes4, Stefano Benazzi5, Paolo Boscato1, Annamaria Ronchitelli1, Adriana Moroni1,2, Ivan Martini1.
Abstract
After the last interglacial [Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 5e] Europe was affected by several harsh climatic oscillations. In this context southern Italy acted, like the rest of peninsular Mediterranean Europe, as a 'glacial refugium', allowing the survival of various species, and was involved in the spread of 'cold taxa' (e.g. woolly mammoth and woolly rhino) only during the coldest phases (MIS 4 and MIS 2). Both late Mousterian and early Upper Palaeolithic sites testify to a human occupation continuity in southern Italy and especially in Apulia in this time span. Here we present a focus on three key Apulian Palaeolithic sequences (Grotta di Santa Croce, Riparo L'Oscurusciuto and Grotta del Cavallo - layers F-E) jointly spanning from the late MIS 4 to the demise of Neanderthals around 43 ka. Novel chronological, sedimentological and zooarchaeological data are discussed for the first time in the light of the palaeoenvironmental information provided by recent analyses carried out on a speleothem from Pozzo Cucù cave (Bari) and the results of the magnetic susceptibility analysis from Riparo L'Oscurusciuto. This integrated reading allows a better understanding of the role played by the Apulian region as both a refugium for late Neaderthals and a suitable habitat for the early settling of modern humans.Entities:
Keywords: MIS 3; Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition; refugia; southern Italy
Year: 2021 PMID: 35874299 PMCID: PMC9291488 DOI: 10.1002/jqs.3319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Quat Sci ISSN: 0267-8179
Figure 1‘Warm’ (Dama, Palaeoloxodon and Hippopotamus) and ‘Cold’ (Coelodonta and Mammuthus) large mammal taxa in Italy during MIS 5 and MIS 4–3. Circled area: geographical position of the archaeological sites analysed in this work (Nos. 10–12) and Grotta di Pozzo Cucù, (speleotheme, No. 8, white triangle). The digital elevation model is the European digital elevation model from the GMES RDA project (https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/eu-dem#tab-originaldata/eudem_hlsd_3035_europe). The bathymetric model is from the European Marine Observation and Data Network. The map was generated using ArcGIS version 10.5. In A are represented both the minimum extension of the coastline during MIS 5e and a mean of the maximum estimated extension of the coastline (grey line) during the cooler oscillations of MIS 5. Sites: A (MIS 5): (1) Contrada Iannì, (2) Grotta Grande, (3) Avetrana, (4) Campoverde, (5) Grotta della Madonna dell'Arma, (6) Ciota Ciara, (7) Caverna degli Orsi, (8) Grotta di Pozzo Cucù. B (MIS 4–3): (8) Grotta di Pozzo Cucù, (9) Grotta Romanelli, (10) Grotta del Cavallo, (11) Riparo L'Oscurusciuto, (12) Grotta Santa Croce, (13) Grotta della Cala, (14) Riparo del Poggio, (15) Grotta di Castelcivita, (16) Grotta di Sant'Agostino, (17) Grotta Reali, (18) Grotta Guattari, (19) Grotta del Fossellone, (20) Grotta Breuil, (21) Grotta dei Santi, (22) Grotta la Fabbrica, (23) Buca della Iena, (24) Settepolesini di Bondeno, (25) Riparo Tagliente, (26) Grotta Fumane, (27) Riparo Bombrini. See text for references and explanations. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2The studied sites. A: Riparo L'Oscurusciuto (photo by Paolo Boscato); B: Grotta di Santa Croce (photo by Paolo Boscato); C: Grotta del Cavallo (photo by Vincenzo Spagnolo); D: Grotta di Pozzo cucù (photo by Orlando Lacarbonara). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3Stratigraphic sequences of the studied archaeological sites (C modified after Palma di Cesnola, 2001). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
ESR/U‐series data and ages of teeth from Santa Croce.
| Samples | Tissue | U content (p.p.m.) (2σ) | 234U/238U (2σ) | 230Th/234U (2σ) | 222Rn/230Th | Initial thickness (µm) | Removed thickness internal side (µm) | Removed thickness external side (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC535 | Dentine | 20.01 ± 0.69 | 1.025 ± 0.049 | 0.066 ± 0.009 | 0.191 | 1339 ± 167 | 35 ± 4 | 29 ± 4 |
| Enamel | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 1.033 ± 0.092 | 0.130 ± 0.029 | 1.000 | ||||
| SC546 | Dentine | 94.88 ± 2.71 | 1.075 ± 0.059 | 0.109 ± 0.011 | 0.110 | 1467 ± 183 | 38 ± 5 | 26 ± 3 |
| Enamel | 1.76 ± 0.08 | 0.952 ± 0.059 | 0.133 ± 0.013 | 0.261 | ||||
| SC549 | Dentine | 6.42 ± 0.26 | 1.068 ± 0.061 | 0.403 ± 0.080 | 1.000 | 1246 ± 156 | 29 ± 4 | 27 ± 3 |
| Enamel | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 1.005 ± 0.128 | 0.403 ± 0.080 | 1.000 |
A k‐value (α efficiency) of 0.13 ± 0.02 (Grün and Katzenberger‐Apel, 1994).
The water content of the sediments was estimated after 1 week of drying in a 40 °C oven but, as the sampled section has been open for a long time, the obtained values were considered as minima and a representative value of 15 ± 5% was assumed for the age calculations. Water contents of 0 wt% in the enamel and 7 wt% in the dentine were used.
The beta dose attenuation was evaluated from the enamel part destroyed on each side of the enamel layer during the preparation process (according to Brennan et al., 1997).
The age uncertainty was calculated with a Monte Carlo approach (Shao et al., 2014).
Figure 4Bayesian age model of the Santa Croce external deposits (performed with Chronomodel). The very young age of the modelled end of the Mousterian sequence is probably biased by erosional events.
Figure 5Sedimentary log of the Oscurusciuto succession with the locations of samples collected for magnetic susceptibility (MS) analysis. Results of MS measurement are reported and accompanied by bar logs that highlight the main palaeoclimate fluctuations as deduced by MS data. Samples OSC 229 and 230 have not been analysed due to their composition, almost exclusively represented by volcanic ash. χLF and χHF: low‐ and high‐frequency MS values. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Number of identified specimens (NISP) according to sites and layers.
| Site | Layers |
|
|
|
|
|
| Caprinae |
|
|
| Cervidae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC | EIII5 | 53 | 1 | 1 | 86 | / | / | / | 52 | / | / | / | 3 | / | / | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 204 |
| GC | FI | 14 | / | / | 25 | / | / | / | 22 | / | 3 | 2 | / | / | / | / | / | 6 | 4 | 76 |
| GC | FII | 21 | / | / | 46 | / | / | / | 26 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 1 | / | / | / | / | 7 | 2 | 113 |
| RO | 1 | 2 | / | / | 20 | / | / | / | 11 | 1 | 6 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 40 |
| RO | 2/29/30/31 | 48 | / | / | 82 | 5 | / | / | 27 | 8 | 12 | 3 | / | / | 1 | / | / | / | / | 186 |
| RO | 3 | 16 | / | / | 15 | 1 | / | / | 15 | 2 | 1 | / | / | 7 | / | / | / | / | / | 57 |
| RO | 4 | 7 | / | / | 165 | 1 | 4 | / | 26 | 4 | 10 | 2 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 219 |
| RO | 5‐6‐7 | 1 | / | / | 160 | / | / | / | 9 | 2 | 20 | 5 | / | 1 | / | / | 1 | 2 | / | 201 |
| RO | 8 | 1 | / | / | 79 | / | / | / | 4 | / | 7 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 91 |
| RO | 9 | 4 | / | / | 69 | / | / | / | 12 | 4 | 6 | 1 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 96 |
| RO | 11 | 3 | / | / | 61 | / | / | / | 5 | 1 | 3 | / | 1 | / | / | / | / | / | / | 74 |
| GSC | 525 | 142 | / | / | 111 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 253 |
| GSC | 535 | 73 | / | / | 96 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 169 |
| GSC | 546 | 68 | / | / | 131 | / | / | / | 1 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 200 |
| GSC | 549 | 15 | / | / | 53 | / | / | / | 4 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 72 |
Abbreviations: GC, Grotta del Cavallo; GSC, Grotta di Santa Croce; RO, Riparo L'Oscurusciuto.
Figure 6Comparison between palaeoclimate proxies (rainfall amount and soil bioproductivity) from Pozzo Cucù Cave (PC stalagmite, Columbu et al., 2020), magnetic susceptibility data from Riparo L'Oscurusciuto and zooarchaeology from the studied archaeological sites. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]