Xiaolong Zhao1, Zhonghe Tian1,2, Cheng Ma1, Lihua Li1, Jiang Yang1. 1. Liaoning Petrochemical University, Dandong Road, Wanghua District, Fushun City, Liaoning Province 113001, China. 2. Sinopec Zhenhai Refining & Chemical Company, 226 Lianhua Road, Zhenhai District, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province 315207, China.
Abstract
In this study, an effective and environmentally friendly polyaminated cross-linked chitosan (M-PACTS) flocculant was successfully synthesized via circular focus single-mode microwave synthesizer irradiation. Epichlorohydrin and tetraethylenepentamine were used as the cross-linking agent and active cationic reagent, respectively. The same formation was used to prepare cationic lightly cross-linked chitosan (C-PACTS) via the conventional heating method. The flocculant was characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. The flocculation capability of C-PACTS and M-PACTS was compared using laundry wastewater as a model pollutant. The pH, PACTS dosage, temperature, stirring rate, stirring time, and setting time were systematically investigated. The experimental results showed that circular focus single-mode microwave synthesizer irradiation was a more efficient method to modify chitosan. M-PACTS exhibited a higher capacity for turbidity and chemical oxygen demand (CODCr) removal. Under optimal conditions, the removal rate values of M-PACTS were up to 96% (turbidity) and 78% (CODCr). The proposed PACTS is suitable for treatment of polluted wastewater in an eco-friendly manner without causing secondary pollution.
In this study, an effective and environmentally friendly polyaminated cross-linked chitosan (M-PACTS) flocculant was successfully synthesized via circular focus single-mode microwave synthesizer irradiation. Epichlorohydrin and tetraethylenepentamine were used as the cross-linking agent and active cationic reagent, respectively. The same formation was used to prepare cationic lightly cross-linked chitosan (C-PACTS) via the conventional heating method. The flocculant was characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. The flocculation capability of C-PACTS and M-PACTS was compared using laundry wastewater as a model pollutant. The pH, PACTS dosage, temperature, stirring rate, stirring time, and setting time were systematically investigated. The experimental results showed that circular focus single-mode microwave synthesizer irradiation was a more efficient method to modify chitosan. M-PACTS exhibited a higher capacity for turbidity and chemical oxygen demand (CODCr) removal. Under optimal conditions, the removal rate values of M-PACTS were up to 96% (turbidity) and 78% (CODCr). The proposed PACTS is suitable for treatment of polluted wastewater in an eco-friendly manner without causing secondary pollution.
Wastewater treatment is
important to human and environmental health.[1] As an important component of domestic sewage,
laundry wastewater is discharged mainly from schools, hospitals, hotels,
restaurants, residential areas, etc. This type of wastewater has high
turbidity, micropollutants, and eutrophication materials; can affect
the growth and reproduction of aquatic animals and plants; and has
the potential for severe degradation of aquatic ecosystems.[2,3]Typically, laundry wastewater predominantly contains surfactants,
carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium tripolyphosphate, oils, dust particles,
and a variety of microorganisms. Prolonged exposure to laundry wastewater
can lead to skin keratosis, and the hazardous substances therein have
toxic effects on the kidneys, gallbladder, and pancreas if they enter
the bloodstream. Enzyme-containing detergents are used to hydrolyze
the proteins on clothing to remove protein fouling. However, these
alkaline proteases can also break down proteins on the surface of
the skin and cause atopic dermatitis, eczema, etc. At low concentrations,
all organic substances are present in the form of molecules and ions
present in the water, forming a homogeneous system. At high concentrations,
in the presence of suspended particulates, fine dispersed pollutants,
and oil products, they may form colloid structures and act as stabilizers
of emulsions and suspensions.[4]The
pollution in laundry wastewater results in high turbidity and
chemical oxygen demand (COD), which are typical indicators for measuring
sewage quality. Flocculation is typically used as a fast and efficient
method for wastewater treatment. Through adsorption, bridging, and
enmeshment effects, flocculants can dispose of suspended particles,
colloids, and dissolved organic matter, and promote agglomeration
by making “bridges” between these flocculants, causing
them to agglomerate and precipitate out of solution.[5] Currently, inorganic polymers (metals salts) are the most
commonly used flocculants for wastewater treatment. Specifically,
polymeric ferric sulfate and polyaluminum chloride are the most extensively
studied and applied reagents among them. Sometimes, to convert the
smaller flocculants into larger particles, certain synthetic flocculant
aids such as polyacrylamide (PAM) are added to the wastewater after
the coagulation process. However, despite the high efficiency of inorganic
flocculants, they can cause secondary pollution. For example, excessive
flocculants can leave behind metallic elements, especially aluminum,
which can accumulate within the brain neurons through drinking water
and may impact memory and even lead to Alzheimer’s disease.[6] Moreover, residues of coagulant aids such as
PAM ultimately find their way into surface water and groundwater.
These residues not only change the physical and chemical properties
of water but also contribute to the pollution. For example, PAM degradation
products (acrylamide) can damage the nervous systems of humans and
animals.[7]Synthetic organic polymeric
flocculants and inorganic flocculants
have been gradually replaced by a variety of environmentally friendly
natural polymer flocculants such as starch[8] and cellulose[9] to cope with these problems.
These natural polymers have abundant raw material availability and
are nontoxic, readily biodegradable, and easy to modify.[10] Consequently, modified natural polymers have
increasingly attracted the interest of researchers and have become
a viable alternative choice in wastewater treatment.[11] Among the numerous natural biopolymers, chitosan (CTS)
is the only one with amine groups, is widely found in many arthropods
(such as insects and crustaceans) and fungi, and is the second most
abundant biological polymer in nature after cellulose.[12] These two properties make the large-scale production
and application of CTS possible. When amino groups are in an acidic
environment, H+ renders the whole molecule electropositive
and promotes antimicrobial properties. Because most pollutants in
water are electronegative, CTS has application prospects as a broad
flocculant and heavy metal ion adsorbent.[13,14] Picos-Corrales et al. used CTS as a bioflocctulant to treat wastewaters
from Sinaloa (Mexico). Jar test results showed that CTS exhibited
high effectiveness in pollutant removal from different sampling zones
(agricultural wastewater and river water) and led to 40% Mn removal
from highly contaminated river water samples.[15]Chemical modification could improve the performance of CTS.
Although
the conventional heating method has been used to modify CTS, it is
a time-consuming and energy-intensive process. Single-mode microwave
irradiation provides accurate and controllable synthesis energy for
the reaction between chemical bonds.[16] Zhan
et al. prepared a terpolymer (CDL) by microwave-assisted copolymerization.[17] Their results showed excellent flocculation
efficiencies for acid black 172 and reactive orange C-3R simulated
wastewater (100 mg/L) with removal ratios of 99.8% and 97.7% at a
CDL concentration of 250 mg/L, respectively. In this study, a single-mode
microwave irradiation synthesizer was adopted for the synthesis of
polyaminated cross-linked CTS (M-PACTS) as a flocculant and compared
with that synthesized by the conventional heating method. Two main
water treatment evaluation indices, turbidity and CODCr, were tested under various parameters (dosage, pH, temperature,
stirring rate, time, and setting time) to compare the flocculation
performance of the products synthesized by the different methods.
Here, we show that single-mode microwave irradiation could be an efficient
tool to modify CTS.
Methods
Preparation of PACTS
All chemical reagents were purchased
from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., and along with the water
were of analytical grade.
Preparation of M-PACTS
CTS powder
(0.5 g) was dissolved
in 20 mL of 1% acetic acid solution. Subsequently, 3 mL of epichlorohydrin,
5 mL of ultrapure water, and 0.05 g of p-toluenesulfonic
acid catalyzer were added to a long-neck flask. The mixture was heated
to 80 °C to promote the ring-opening reaction of epichlorohydrin.
Then, CTS and epichlorohydrin solutions were mixed and the pH of the
mixed solution was adjusted to 7.0 by adding 0.1 mol L–1 NaOH. The prepared mixture was placed in a single-mode microwave
synthesizer (Discover, CEM, USA) at 40 W and 80 °C until gel-like
cross-linked CTS (CL-CTS) was obtained. The gel was smashed with a
200 mesh sieve and washed several times with ultrapure water to eliminate
excess acetic acid.The product obtained in the previous step
was dispersed in 30 mL of ultrapure water. When the gel swelled in
water to form a transparent and homogeneous colloidal solution, 10
mL tetraethylenepentamine was added to the solution and stirred for
2 h. Subsequently, this mixture was transferred into single-mode microwave
reactor at 30 W, 70 °C. After the final purification step, the
M-PACTS was preserved in a sealed environment.
Preparation
of C-PACTS
The cationic lightly cross-linked
CTS (C-PACTS) flocculant was synthesized by conventional heating according
to the method described by Huang et al., and the equation is shown
in Figure .[18]
Figure 1
Equation for the preparation of the cationic lightly cross-linked
chitosan (C-PACTS) flocculant.
Equation for the preparation of the cationic lightly cross-linked
chitosan (C-PACTS) flocculant.The properties of the laundry wastewater (obtained from a student
dormitory of Liaoning Shihua University) are listed in Table .
Table 1
Physicochemical
Properties of Laundry
Wastewater Used in the Study
parameter
value
appearance
purple-gray and turbid
T (°C)
20 °C
pH
6.2
turbidity (NTU)
62.1
CODCr (mg L–1)
1453.7
BOD (mg L–1)
382.5
TDS (mg L–1)
1213
conductivity (μS/cm)
457.6
Flocculation Experiments
All experiments were carried
out using jar test equipment (Apex Instruments, Fuquay-Varina, NC,
USA) with 500 mL of wastewater and a certain amount of PACTS under
different parameters. Wastewater was sealed and stored in a dark environment
at 4 °C before the experiments. The main steps of the experiments
consisted of four consecutive stages: (1) adjusting the wastewater
pH using dilute sulfuric acid (0.1 mol L–1) and
NaOH (0.1 mol L–1) within a range of 2–7;
(2) adding PACTS to the pH-adjusted wastewater and stirring intensely
under different rates and time values at a certain temperature to
ensure even dispersion of PACTS; (3) after the fast stirring, performing
slow stirring under different rates and time values at a certain temperature
to investigate whether the stirring conditions could influence the
process of adsorption and flocculation; (4) Adjusting the solution
pH to 7 to reunite the smaller flocculants and then slowing it to
settle for 40 min. Subsequently, the PACTS-pollutant flocculants were
removed by filtering, and the clear liquid obtained was used to test
the turbidity and CODCr.The turbidity and CODCr values were measured using a turbidimeter and CODCr rapid detector, respectively. All experiments (except for the one
on the temperature effect) were carried out at room temperature (20
± 2 °C).
Analytical Methods
Fourier transform
infrared (FT-IR)
spectra of CTS, CL-CTS, and PACTS at wavenumbers between 400–4000
cm–1 were measured using WQF-520 FT-IR spectrometer
(Beijing Beifen-ruili Analytical Instrument (Group) Co., Ltd., China).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of CTS and PACTS was performed
using TSM-7900F (JEOL Ltd., Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis
was performed using D/max-RB X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan)
operating at a voltage of 40 kV and current of 100 mA using Co Kα
radiation. The pH was measured using PHS-25 acidimeter (Shanghai Lei-ci
Instrument, China). The chemical oxygen demand (CODCr)
was measured using a COD rapid detector (DR1010 rapid detector and
DRB200 digestive machine, Hach, USA). Turbidity was determined using
a turbidimeter (2100Q Turbidimeter, Hach, USA). The conductivity was
measured at pre- and post-treatment stages using a conductivity detector
(Sension7, Hach, USA).
Results and Discussion
FT-IR
Analysis
The spectrum of CTS, CL-CTS, and PACTS
are shown in Figure . The main characteristic peaks of observed CTS were as follows:
3368 cm–1 (a broadening multiple peak generated
by the overlapping of O–H stretch, N–H stretch, and
interhydrogen bond), 2920 and 2871 cm–1 (methyl
and methylene C–H stretch, respectively), 2360 and 2343 cm–1 (CO2 asymmetric stretch), 1653 cm–1 (amide I band, C=O stretch), 1599 cm–1 (amide II band, N–H bending), 1423 cm–1 (C–N bending and C–H bending), 1381 cm–1 (amide III band, C–N stretch), 1325 cm–1 (C–H bending), 1261 cm–1 (C–N stretch),
1157 cm–1 (C–O–C stretch), and 1084
cm–1 (C–O stretch).[19]
Figure 2
FT-IR
spectra of chitosan (CTS), cross-linked chitosan (CL-CTS),
and polyaminated cross-linked chitosan (PACTS).
FT-IR
spectra of chitosan (CTS), cross-linked chitosan (CL-CTS),
and polyaminated cross-linked chitosan (PACTS).Compared to CTS powder, the CL-CTS retained more characteristics
than CTS. However, the 1599 cm–1 N–H bending
and 1423 cm–1 C–N bending disappeared because
of the cross-linking action between −NH2 and −OH.After the addition of tetraethylenepentamine, obvious changes to
PACTS were observed at 3420 and 3174 cm–1 (N–H
stretch). This indicates that abundant amino groups were introduced
and the hydrogen bond effect caused the overlapping peaks (−OH
and −NH2) to shift to lower wavenumbers. Around
1650–1550 cm–1, the deformation vibration
of N–H reappeared in the plane and was reinforced. Moreover,
1472 cm–1 (asymmetric deformation of CH2) and 1322 cm–1 (symmetric deformation of CH2) became stronger, indicating that −CH2–
was introduced by tetraethylenepentamine. However, a large number
of amino groups can also increase the number of inter- or extra-molecular
hydrogen bonds, causing the absorption peaks to shift to lower wavenumbers.
All the above changes indicate that the target products were quickly
and successfully synthesized via single-mode microwave irradiation.[18]
Thermogravimetry/Differential Thermal Analysis
Thermogravimetry/differential
thermal analysis (TG-DTA) of CTS and PACTS is shown in Figure . The CTS DTA curve shows three
stages of weight loss. In the first stage, the TG results showed approximately
11.6% weight loss due to the physically absorbed water escaping from
the molecular structure and being fixed by hydrogen bonding, as demonstrated
by the DTA endothermic peak at 84.5 °C. The second stage indicates
that approximately 35.0% CTS powder was lost in the temperature range
of 232.6 to 342.2 °C (with the maximum loss at 307.3 °C).
This exothermic peak (307.3 °C) was mainly caused by strong decomposition
that included the dehydration of CTS, breakage of glycosidic bonds,
and partial decomposition of the acetylated and deacetylated units
of the polymer (CTS rings were not completely decomposed). In the
third stage, when the temperature rose to 800 °C, the mass of
CTS dropped gradually because of the further fractionation of the
CTS ring and the carbonization of organic matter. After chemical modification,
the changes in the structure and the interactions between the different
groups had a strong influence on the thermal stability of CTS.
Figure 3
Thermogravimetry/differential
thermal analysis of (a) CTS and (b)
PACTS.
Thermogravimetry/differential
thermal analysis of (a) CTS and (b)
PACTS.PACTS also showed three stages
of weight loss, but there were apparent
differences compared to those of CTS. In the first stage, the temperature
at which water loss occurred for PACTS was evidently lower than that
for CTS, whereas the weight loss was higher than that of CTS. This
was mainly caused by the cross-linking reaction and the introduction
of amine groups. CTS cross-linked with epichlorohydrin to form a new
space network structure. However, this reaction occurred on C2 −NH2, and C6 −OH, which decreased the capacity to form
H–O–H hydrogen bonds with water, making it easier for
water to evaporate. This could also be confirmed from the TG curve,
which indicated that the decomposition temperature of PACTS was much
lower than that of CTS because the chemical modification destroyed
its original crystalline structure. Beyond that, there was a final
weight loss stage over 229.0–372.6 °C, which may be related
to the degradation of the side amine chain and the fragmentation of
cross-linking between CTS molecules.
SEM Analysis
The
SEM images are shown in Figure . After cross-linking and chemical
modification, CTS lost its smooth laminar structure and formed a new
irregular structure with side chains. This type of structure has a
smaller size and higher surface area, which can be more favorable
for capturing fine particles and colloids. Subsequently, the flocculants
coagulated to form larger particles and precipitate.
Figure 4
SEM images of (a) CTS
and (b) PACTS.
SEM images of (a) CTS
and (b) PACTS.
Flocculation Effect of
Laundry Wastewater and Removal of Turbidity
and CODCr
To compare the water treatment efficiency
of the different synthesis methods, we used PACTS produced via conventional
heating (C-PACTS) and that produced via microwave irradiation (M-PACTS)
as flocculants for the treatment of laundry wastewater. In the preparation
of C-PACTS, the same dosage of reagents and materials was used as
for M-PACTS, and a conventional hot plate stirrer with round-bottom
flasks was used as an energy source.[18] Finally,
several natural-polymer flocculants and inorganic flocculants were
used for comparison.
pH Effect
For natural-polymer flocculants,
especially
CTS and its derivatives, pH is the most important factor influencing
coagulation.[20] An acidic medium was used
to provide H+ for the amine group to enhance the electropositivity.
After protonation, the acidic medium transforms the free −NH2 into −NH3+. In the experiment,
500 mL wastewater was spiked with 40 mg of M-PACTS and C-PACTS (dry
weight) at 20 °C, then stirred at 150 rpm for 3 min, followed
by stirring at 50 rpm for 10 min. Finally, the pH of the wastewater
was adjusted to 6. The influence of the initial pH of the wastewater
on the turbidity and CODCr removal rate is shown in Figure . At the initial
wastewater pH of 3, both C-PACTS and M-PACTS had the highest turbidity
and COD removal rate, which is consistent with the results of Lu et
al.[21] It is thus proven that the strongly
cationic CTS derivative has the best performance at a lower pH. The
highest water treatment capability at pH 3 can be explained by the
enhanced electrostatic attraction and the reduction in hydrogen bonds.
At a lower pH, more H+ is provided to the amino groups,
and the protonated amino groups enhance the electrostatic attraction
between negatively charged colloids and positively charged adsorption
sites. This enforces charge neutralization and adsorption bridging
processes. However, at higher pH values between 4 and 7, more OH– is available to compete with the anionic colloids
and suspended particles of wastewater for the adsorption sites of
PACTS. This decreases the number of adsorption sites and, consequently,
the coagulation ability. From another aspect, the mass of amino groups
in a neutral environment has a strong hydrogen bond effect, which
causes high viscosity and low dispersibility of PACTS in wastewater.
In an acidic solution, the protonated amino groups hinder the formation
of hydrogen bonds, which also improves coagulation efficiency. However,
when the pH is lower than 3, the fraction of PACTS may degrade under
strongly acidic conditions, and a mass of H+ leads to charge
reversal on the colloid surface.
Figure 5
Influence of wastewater initial pH value
on (a) turbidity and (b)
chemical oxygen demand removal rates of M-PACTS and C-PACTS.
Influence of wastewater initial pH value
on (a) turbidity and (b)
chemical oxygen demand removal rates of M-PACTS and C-PACTS.
Dosage Effect
At an initial wastewater
pH of 3, with
other conditions remaining the same, the effect of the flocculant
dosage on the turbidity and the COD removal rate is shown in Figure . We observed that
with an increase in the flocculation dosage, both M-PACTS and C-PACTS
showed increased turbidity and COD removal rates. The highest turbidity
and COD removal rates were achieved at dosages of 120 and 140 mg/L
for M-PACTS and C-PACTS, respectively. However, despite the higher
dosage, the optimal turbidity and COD removal rates of C-PACTS were
82.3 and 56.1%, respectively, which are lower than those of M-PACTS
(10.2 and 10.7%, respectively). Moreover, M-PACTS had a higher water
content than C-PACTS because M-PACTS had a lower degree of cross-linking.
This also indicates that there are more active sites (−OH,
−NH2) after grafting with tetraethylenepentamine.
Furthermore, the high cross-linking degree results in an excessively
compact interior structure, which probably hinders adsorption within
PACTS. Through microwave irradiation, the cross-linking degree can
be controlled more easily by regulating radiation power, temperature,
and time in a shorter period (approximately 1/8 of the conventional
heating method), and the grafting of tetraethylenepentamine is more
efficient. Once the optimal dosage is exceeded, the excessive flocculants
are adsorbed on the surface of the flocculants and then restabilize
in the water, causing a reduction in flocculation performance. In
addition, the excessive flocculants result in more residual soluble
CTS derivatives. Finally, these organics dissolved in the water contribute
to COD. This phenomenon can also be proven by the performance of C-PACTS.
The higher degree of cross-linking and the lower viscosity contributed
to the minimal soluble CTS derivatives in the flocculants. Therefore,
the decrease in turbidity and COD removal rates was not evident with
an increase in redundant flocculants.
Figure 6
Influence of dosage on (a) turbidity and
(b) COD removal rates
for M-PACTS and C-PACTS.
Influence of dosage on (a) turbidity and
(b) COD removal rates
for M-PACTS and C-PACTS.
Temperature Effect
At an initial wastewater pH of 3,
the flocculant dosages were 120 and 140 mg/L for M-PACTS and C-PACTS,
respectively, with other conditions similar as to what has been previously
described. The results for the optimal wastewater temperature are
shown in Figure .
When the temperature was lower than 25 °C, the removal rates
of turbidity and COD increased as the temperature increased. Nevertheless,
when the temperature exceeded 25 °C, the flocculation efficiency
decreased with the increase in temperature. This phenomenon can be
explained as follows. First, the increasing temperature induced flocculants,
suspended particles, and colloids to a faster diffusion rate. In addition,
the higher temperature decreased the viscosity of the mixing water
solution, which accelerated the flocculation reaction and promoted
the setting and coagulation of the flocculants. Second, when the temperature
exceeded a certain range, the movement of particles in the water system
was too fast, leading to the formation of smaller flocculants with
an unstable structure. These factors inhibited flocculation. Third,
a higher temperature facilitated the dissolution of the soluble fraction
in PACTS in acidic environments; therefore, the turbidity and COD
increased again. Owing to the high cross-linking degree and less soluble
structure, the flocculation performance of C-PACTS at high water temperatures
may have been better than M-PACTS (>40 °C). However, based
on
practical situations and the principle of optimality, M-PACTS was
still the most efficient for flocculation. At an optimal temperature
(25 °C), M-PACTS exhibited a better performance with turbidity
and COD removal rates reaching 95.1 and 70.1%, respectively. The comparison
of wastewater treatment between C-PACTS and M-PACTS and the flocculation
mechanism of the PACTS are shown in Figures and 9.
Figure 7
Influence of
temperature on turbidity and CODCr removal
rates for M-PACTS and conventional C-PACTS.
Figure 8
Comparison
of laundry wastewater treatment with (a) C-PACTS and
(b) M-PACTS in the laboratory environment.
Figure 9
Flocculation
mechanism diagram.
Influence of
temperature on turbidity and CODCr removal
rates for M-PACTS and conventional C-PACTS.Comparison
of laundry wastewater treatment with (a) C-PACTS and
(b) M-PACTS in the laboratory environment.Flocculation
mechanism diagram.
Stirring Rate and Mixing
Time Effect
When comparing
the flocculation performance between M-PACTS and C-PACTS, the results
clearly show that M-PACTS had a better water treatment ability. Thus,
the study focused on M-PACTS in subsequent experiments. The stirring
process was divided into fast and slow stirring. Previous studies
have shown that fast stirring favors the dispersion of M-PACTS and
particle collisions, but excessive stirring speed and time results
in smaller and unstable flocculants. In contrast, slow stirring increases
the size of the destabilization particles and enhances adsorption.
Therefore, the effect of different combinations of stirring rate and
stirring time on the removal rates of turbidity and COD was analyzed
via four-factor and four-level orthogonal experiments. As shown in Table , for turbidity removal,
the best combination was fast stirring for 3 min at 250 rpm, followed
by slow stirring for 15 min at 50 rpm, and the sequence of influence
level was D > A > C > B. The best COD removal was achieved
when fast
stirring for 2 min at 250 rpm, followed by slow stirring for 25 min
at 40 rpm. The sequence of the influence levels was D > C >
B > A.
Table 2
Analysis of Effective Stirring Speed
and Time at Two Flocculation Stages for M-PACTS
no.
A R1 (rpm)
B T1 (min)
C R2 (rpm)
D T2 (min)
turbidity removal (%)
CODCr removal (%)
1
1 (150)
1 (2.0)
1 (30)
1 (10)
93.3
68.8
2
1
2 (2.5)
2 (40)
2 (15)
93.9
70.2
3
1
3 (3.0)
3 (50)
3 (20)
94.8
75.9
4
1
4 (3.5)
4 (60)
4 (25)
95.2
75.5
5
2 (200)
1
2
3
94.2
75.3
6
2
2
1
4
95.7
76.2
7
2
3
4
1
94.1
66.2
8
2
4
3
2
96.2
73.7
9
3 (250)
1
3
4
95.9
78.2
10
3
2
4
3
94.8
75.1
11
3
3
1
2
97.0
72.6
12
3
4
2
1
94.3
70.8
13
4 (300)
1
4
2
96.3
75.5
14
4
2
3
1
94.5
71.3
15
4
3
2
4
95.2
75.7
16
4
4
1
3
93.5
68.2
The
results show that the optimal removal rates of turbidity and
COD could not be achieved under the same hydraulic conditions. Compared
with the turbidity removal rates, the COD removal rates change significantly
with stirring rates. This phenomenon indicates that PACTS has a higher
stability and capacity to resist disturbance for stirring in turbidity
removal, and a longer slow stirring time facilitates the adsorption
of COD and other particles. Considering various factors, combination
9 can be considered as the best hydraulic condition (Table ).
Conclusions
In
this study, a single-mode microwave irradiation synthesizer
was adopted for the synthesis of a PACTS flocculant. The proposed
flocculant is environment-friendly, can be sustainably sourced, and
creates no secondary pollution. To improve the efficiency and stability,
we used epichlorohydrin and tetraethylenepentamine as the cross-linking
and cationic reagents. The single-mode microwave irradiation significantly
improved the synthesis and flocculation ability. The effects of pH,
dosage, temperature, stirring conditions, and setting time was investigated
to obtain the optimal flocculation conditions, which were found to
be as follows: M-PACTS dosage of 120 mg/L, initial wastewater pH of
3, water temperature of 25 °C, stirring with a combination of
fast stirring at 250 rpm (2 min) and slow stirring at 50 rpm (25 min),
and setting time of 40 min. Under these conditions, the turbidity
and COD removal rates were as much as 96 and 78%, respectively. Moreover,
the experimental results also demonstrated that, in contrast to conventional
heating method, single-mode microwave irradiation could indeed improve
the reaction and flocculation efficiency. Because of the introduction
of abundant amino groups, electrostatic adsorption between PACTS and
particles plays a major role in wastewater treatment. In addition,
charge neutralization and sweeping coagulation also contributed to
the flocculation process. This study determined that the single-mode
microwave irradiation method could efficiently and quickly synthesize
cationic CTS flocculant. This method should be scaled up for industrial
production, as it has significant potential to make a contribution
to the development and application of bioflocculants.
Authors: Yunlong Luo; Wenshan Guo; Huu Hao Ngo; Long Duc Nghiem; Faisal Ibney Hai; Jian Zhang; Shuang Liang; Xiaochang C Wang Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2014-01-04 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Lorenzo A Picos-Corrales; Juan I Sarmiento-Sánchez; Jose P Ruelas-Leyva; Grégorio Crini; Eduardo Hermosillo-Ochoa; J Ariel Gutierrez-Montes Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2020-02-24