| Literature DB >> 35874186 |
Leila Benarous1,2, Khedidja Benarous3, Ghulam Muhammad4, Zulfiqar Ali5.
Abstract
The fast spread of the COVID-19 over the world pressured scientists to find its cures. Especially, with the disastrous results, it engendered from human life losses to long-term impacts on infected people's health and the huge financial losses. In addition to the massive efforts made by researchers and medicals on finding safe, smart, fast, and efficient methods to accurately make an early diagnosis of the COVID-19. Some researchers focused on finding drugs to treat the disease and its symptoms, others worked on creating effective vaccines, while several concentrated on finding inhibitors for the key enzymes of the virus, to reduce its spreading and reproduction inside the human body. These enzymes' inhibitors are usually found in aliments, plants, fungi, or even in some drugs. Since these inhibitors slow and halt the replication of the virus in the human body, they can help fight it at an early stage saving the patient from death risk. Moreover, if the human body's immune system gets rid of the virus at the early stage it can be spared from the disastrous sequels it may leave inside the patient's body. Our research aims to find aliments and plants that are rich in these inhibitors. In this paper, we developed a deep learning application that is trained with various aliments, plants, and drugs to detect if a component contains SARS-CoV-2 key inhibitor(s) intending to help them find more sources containing these inhibitors. The application is trained to identify various sources rich in thirteen coronavirus-2 key inhibitors. The sources are currently just aliments, plants, and seeds and the identification is done by their names.Entities:
Keywords: Aliments; COVID-19; Deep learning; Identification; Key enzymes inhibitors; Plants
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874186 PMCID: PMC9295888 DOI: 10.1007/s10586-022-03656-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cluster Comput ISSN: 1386-7857 Impact factor: 2.303
Fig. 1COVID-19 Smart Healthcare System
Fig. 2LSTM Cell and its operations
Natural chemical compounds as SARS-CoV-2 3CL-pro potential inhibitors
| Molecule Name | References | Some natural sources |
|---|---|---|
| Folic Acid- vitamin B9 | [ | Turnip greens, Spinach, Romaine, Lettuce, Asparagus, Broccoli, Brussels sprouts, Peanuts, Sunflower seeds, Strawberry, Bananas, Whole grains, Liver, Salmon, Eggs |
| Hispidin | [ | |
| Niacine- vitamin B3 | [ | Chicken Breast, Tuna, Salmon, Anchovies, Ground Beef, Peanuts, Avocado, Brown Rice, Whole Wheat, Mushrooms, Green Peas, Potatoes, Grilled sesame seed, Almond |
| Curcumin | [ | Turmeric, Curcuma amada |
| Baicalin and Baicalein | [ | |
| Aloe-emodin | [ | |
| Amentoflavone | [ | |
| Hesperetin | [ | |
| Luteolin | [ | |
| Quercetin | [ | Capers, Onions, Elderberries, Kale, Okra, Apple Peels, Aronia Berries, Cranberries, Asparagus, Goji Berries, Lovage leaves, Radish leaves |
| Psoralidin | [ | |
| Theaflavin-3′-gallate | [ | Black tea, |
| Tannic acid | [ | Black tea, Grapes, Green tea, Persimmons, Black beans, Red beans, Apricots, Cherries, Peaches, Dates, English walnuts, Black walnuts, Cashews, Blueberries, Blackberries, Strawberries, Chocolate, Coffee, Cinnamon, Cumin |
Fig. 3Application building steps
Fig. 4Application building process
LSTM parameters
| Parameter | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Test 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iterations | 2000 | 2000 | 5000 | 7000 |
| ErrorThresh | 5*10–2 | 10–3 | 10–4 | 10–4 |
| Learning Rate | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Momentum | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Callback period | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Training data set type | JSON file of string | |||
| Training data set size | 175 | |||
| Testing data set size | 814 | |||
Testing results recap
| Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Test 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy level | 54% | 55% | 72% | 74% |
| Error rate | 46% | 45% | 28% | 26% |
| False-positive | 73% | 75% | 49% | 42% |
| False-negative | 27% | 25% | 51% | 58% |
Fig. 5Overall Obtained results in each Test
Fig. 6Detailed Results of Test 1
Fig. 7Detailed Results of Test 2
Fig. 8Detailed Results of Test 3
Fig. 9Detailed Results of Test 4