Literature DB >> 35874154

Corrigendum: Neuromuscular Fatigue in Unimanual Handgrip Does Not Completely Affect Simultaneous Bimanual Handgrip.

Mikito Hikosaka1, Yu Aramaki2.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.763580.].
Copyright © 2022 Hikosaka and Aramaki.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bilateral deficit; bimanual movement; handgrip strength; neuromuscular fatigue; unimanual movement

Year:  2022        PMID: 35874154      PMCID: PMC9296840          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.962181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.473


In the original article, there were errors. In this paper, we have referred to the work by Kelso (1984) as an example of “tapping” and the work by Spijkers and Heuer (1995) as an example of “drawing” in the introduction section. However, their works did not involve “tapping” and “drawing” as we report, but rather free movements of the index fingers and hand movements, respectively. Thus, we need to change the term “tapping” to “finger movements” and the term “drawing” to “hand movements”. A correction has been made to the Introduction, Paragraph 1: Simultaneous bimanual movements are not merely the sum of two unimanual movements. When performing symmetrical bimanual movement requiring the simultaneous activation of homologous muscle groups, there are specific interactions between the left and right motor systems (Swinnen, 2002). The interactions have been compared with unimanual movements and/or asymmetrical bimanual movements to investigate various behaviors, including finger movements (Kelso, 1984), hand movements (Spijkers and Heuer, 1995), and reaching (Diedrichsen et al., 2004), as well as their neural basis (Aramaki et al., 2006a,b, 2010, 2011). The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions.

Authors:  Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Resource-demanding versus cost-effective bimanual interaction in the brain.

Authors:  Yu Aramaki; Rieko Osu; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural correlates of the spontaneous phase transition during bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Yu Aramaki; Manabu Honda; Tomohisa Okada; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Suppression of the non-dominant motor cortex during bimanual symmetric finger movement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Y Aramaki; M Honda; N Sadato
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Movement initiation-locked activity of the anterior putamen predicts future movement instability in periodic bimanual movement.

Authors:  Yu Aramaki; Masahiko Haruno; Rieko Osu; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination.

Authors:  J A Kelso
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1984-06

7.  Independent on-line control of the two hands during bimanual reaching.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Rohit Nambisan; Steve W Kennerley; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.386

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.