| Literature DB >> 35874011 |
Huoyun Chen1,2,3, Qun Cheng1,2,3, Qiaoling Chen1,2,3, Xingzhi Ye1,2,3, Yong Qu1,3, Weiwu Song1,2, Shah Fahad4,5, Jianhua Gao1,2, Shah Saud6, Yi Xu1,2,3, Yanfen Shen1,2.
Abstract
Understanding the selenium tolerance of different sweet potato [Dioscorea esculenta (Lour.) Burkill] is essential for simultaneously for breeding of new selenium-tolerant varieties and improving the selenium content in sweet potato. Therefore, a greenhouse experiment was conducted from February to April 2022 to evaluate the effect of sweet potato cultivars and selenium (Na2SeO3) concentrations (0-40 mg/L) on plant growth, physiological activities and plant selenium content distribution. The results showed that when the selenium concentration was more than 3 mg/L, the plant growth was significantly affected and the plant height and root length were significantly different compared to the control. While the selenium concentration was 20 and 40 mg/L had the greatest effect on plant growth when the number of internodes and leaves of the plant decreased, the root system stopped growing and the number of internodes of the plant, the number of leaves and the dry-to-fresh weight ratio of the plant a very significant level compared to reached control. The relative amount of chlorophyll in leaves under treatment with a selenium concentration of 1 mg/L was increased, and the relative amount of chlorophyll in 3 mg/L leaves gradually increased with the increase in the selenium concentration. The values of the maximum photochemical efficiency PSII (fv/fm) and the potential activity of PSII (fv/fo) compared to the control under treatment with 40 mg/L selenium concentration and photosynthesis of plants was inhibited. The selenium content in root, stem and leaf increased with the increase in selenium concentration, and the distribution of selenium content in the plant was leaf <stem <root, and the selenium content in root was significantly higher than that in stem and leaf. In summary, the appropriate concentration of selenium tolerance has been determined to be 3 mg/L. The aquatic culture identification method of selenium tolerance of sweet potatoes and growth indices of various selenium tolerant varieties (lines) established in this study will provide a technical basis for selenium tolerant cultivation and mechanism research.Entities:
Keywords: SPAD value; hydroponic seedlings; photosynthesis; selenium; selenium distribution; sweet potato
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874011 PMCID: PMC9298572 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.965649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1The average daily temperature of the sweet potato hydroponic period in the test area.
Information of sweet potato varieties.
| Variety | Male parent | Female parent | Approved time | Breeder | Breeding unit | Variety characteristics |
| Shangshu19 | Yushu7 | sl-01 | 2003 | Shusheng, Lei, | Shangqiu Institute of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences | The tuber is spindle shaped, with dark red skin and white flesh. The drying rate is 36–38% and the starch content is 23–25% |
| 20167-6 | Group hybridization | Xushu27 | – | Qun, Cheng, | Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture | The tuber is long spindle shaped, with red skin color and purple flesh color. The sun drying rate is 26–28.79%, and the starch content is 17–20% |
Preparation of nutrient solution for inducing root primitive body formation.
| Reserve liquid | Composition | Take the amount (mg/L) | Amount of nutrient solution per culture plate (ml) |
| A | NH4NO3 | 16,500 | 10 |
| KNO3 | 19,000 | ||
| KH2PO4 | 1,700 | ||
| MgSO4⋅7H2O | 3,700 | ||
| CaC | 3,330 | ||
| B | FeSO4⋅7H2O | 5,570 | 2 |
| Na2⋅EDTA | 7,450 |
When preparing reserve liquid A, finally add calcium chloride; when preparing reserve liquid B, dissolve FeSO
Preparation of rooting nutrient solution.
| Reserve liquid | Composition | Take the amount (mg/L) | Amount of nutrient solution per culture plate (ml) |
| A | NH4NO3 | 16,500 | 50 |
| KNO3 | 19,000 | ||
| KH2PO4 | 1,700 | ||
| MgSO4⋅7H2O | 3,700 | ||
| CaC | 3,330 | ||
| B | FeSO4⋅7H2O | 5,570 | 2 |
| Na2⋅EDTA | 7,450 | ||
| C | KI | 830 | 0.6 |
| Na2MoO4⋅2H2O | 250 | ||
| CuSO4⋅5H2O | 25 | ||
| CoCl2⋅6H2O | 25 | ||
| MnSO4⋅4H2O | 22,300 | ||
| ZnSO4⋅7H2O | 8,600 | ||
| H3BO3 | 6,200 |
When preparing reserve liquid A, finally add calcium chloride; when preparing reserve liquid B, dissolve FeSO
Preparation of nutrient solution for subculture and proliferation.
| Reserve liquid | Composition | Take the amount (mg/L) | Amount of nutrient solution per culture plate (ml) |
| A | NH4NO3 | 16,500 | 100 |
| KNO3 | 19,000 | ||
| KH2PO4 | 1,700 | ||
| MgSO4⋅7H2O | 3,700 | ||
| CaC | 3,330 | ||
| B | FeSO4⋅7H2O | 5,570 | 6 |
| Na2⋅EDTA | 7,450 | ||
| C | KI | 830 | 1 |
| Na2MoO4⋅2H2O | 250 | ||
| CuSO4⋅5H2O | 25 | ||
| CoCl2⋅6H2O | 25 | ||
| MnSO4⋅4H2O | 22,300 | ||
| ZnSO4⋅7H2O | 8,600 | ||
| H3BO3 | 6,200 |
When preparing reserve liquid A, finally add calcium chloride; when preparing reserve liquid B, dissolve FeSO
FIGURE 2Growth of Shangshu19 under different selenium concentrations. The selenium concentrations in the first row from left to right are 0, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 3 mg/L, and the selenium concentrations in the second row from left to right are 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/L.
FIGURE 3Growth of 20167-6 under different selenium concentrations. The selenium concentrations in the first row from left to right are 0, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 3 mg/L, and the selenium concentrations in the second row from left to right are 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/L.
FIGURE 4Effects of different selenium concentrations on the plant height of sweet potato. Different lowercase letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.05); Different capital letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.01).
Effects of different selenium concentrations on the growth of sweet potato seedlings in water culture.
| Variety | Selenium concentration (mg/L) | Height (cm) | Stem thick (cm) | Root length (cm) | Internode | Number of buckets | Fresh weight of stem and leaf (g) | Dry weight of stem and leaf (g) | Fresh weight of root (g) | Dry weight of root (g) | Stem and leaf dry fresh weight ratio (%) | Root dry fresh weight ratio (%) |
| Shangshu19 | 0 | 4.83Aa | 3.34ABabc | 10.80Aa | 6.8Aa | 7.8Aa | 2.948Aa | 0.24Aab | 1.119Aa | 0.058Aa | 8.14Dd | 5.21Bb |
| 0.2 | 4.22BCbc | 4.06Aa | 10.82Aa | 6.6Aab | 7.6Aab | 2.192BCbc | 0.19ABbc | 0.909Bb | 0.050Aa | 8.55CDd | 5.47ABb | |
| 0.5 | 4.96ABa | 3.45ABab | 9.64ABb | 6.4Aabc | 7.4Aabc | 2.671ABab | 0.23Aab | 1.035ABab | 0.057Aa | 8.68CDd | 5.52ABb | |
| 1 | 4.44ABCab | 3.32ABabc | 9.34Bb | 5.9Abc | 6.9Abc | 2.243BCbc | 0.19ABbc | 0.882Cb | 0.049Aa | 8.67CDd | 5.65ABb | |
| 3 | 2.70Ee | 3.27ABabc | 6.37Cc | 5.8ABc | 6.8ABc | 1.421Dd | 0.15Bc | 0.365CDc | 0.027Bb | 10.51BCc | 7.51Aa | |
| 5 | 3.11DEde | 4.02Aa | 5.61Cc | 6.8Aa | 7.8Aa | 1.961CDc | 0.20ABab | 0.296DEc | 0.023Bb | 10.46BCc | 7.47Aa | |
| 10 | 3.54CDEcd | 3.57ABab | 2.02Dd | 6.3Aabc | 7.3Aabc | 1.936CDc | 0.22Aab | 0.099Ed | 0.008Cc | 11.80ABbc | 7.51Aa | |
| 20 | 4.09BCDbc | 2.62Bc | – | 4.9BCd | 5.9BCd | 1.957CDc | 0.26Aa | – | – | 13.65Aa | – | |
| 40 | 3.27DEde | 3.20ABbc | – | 4.6Cd | 5.6Cd | 1.903CDc | 0.25Aa | – | – | 13.13Aab | – | |
| 20167-6 | 0 | 5.43Cc | 2.33Aa | 12.44Aa | 5.9Aab | 6.8ABabc | 1.171Dd | 0.120Dd | 0.599BCb | 0.039Cc | 10.14Dd | 6.62BCc |
| 0.2 | 5.25Cc | 1.87Ab | 12.11ABab | 5.4Ab | 6.4ABbc | 1.529CDcd | 0.172CDc | 0.809ABa | 0.051ABCbc | 11.28BCDcd | 6.39Cc | |
| 0.5 | 6.62Bb | 2.11Aab | 11.00ABCbc | 5.7Aab | 6.7ABabc | 2.230ABab | 0.237ABCabc | 0.939Aa | 0.062ABab | 10.78CDd | 6.67BCc | |
| 1 | 7.56Aa | 2.01Aab | 10.64BCc | 6.1Aa | 7.1Aa | 2.483Aa | 0.266Aa | 0.922Aa | 0.064Aa | 10.67CDd | 6.96BCbc | |
| 3 | 5.27Cc | 2.14Aab | 10.17Cc | 5.7Aab | 6.7ABabc | 1.912BCbc | 0.232ABCabc | 0.573Cc | 0.047BCc | 12.17ABCbc | 8.21ABCab | |
| 5 | 5.14Ccd | 2.22Aab | 9.90Cc | 5.9Aab | 6.9ABab | 1.902BCbc | 0.246ABab | 0.439Cc | 0.041Cc | 12.92ABab | 9.20Aa | |
| 10 | 5.30Cc | 2.25Aab | 2.99Dd | 5.7Aab | 6.7ABabc | 1.852BCbc | 0.233ABCabc | 0.105Dd | 0.010Dd | 12.87ABab | 8.37ABa | |
| 20 | 4.94Ccd | 2.20Aab | – | 5.3Ab | 6.2Bc | 1.561CDcd | 0.209ABCbcd | – | – | 13.47Aab | – | |
| 40 | 4.44Cd | 1.97Aab | – | 5.3Ab | 6.3ABbc | 1.384CDd | 0.191BCbc | – | – | 13.75Aa | – |
Different lowercase letters on the same column indicate a significant difference between Se treatments (Sig < 0.05). Different capital letters in the same column indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.01).
FIGURE 5The effect of different selenium concentrations on the root length of sweet potato. The root length of sweet potato is 0 cm at the concentration of 20 and 40 mg/L selenium. Different lowercase letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.05); Different capital letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.01).
FIGURE 6Effects of different selenium concentrations on SPAD value of sweet potato leaves. Different lowercase letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.05); Different capital letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.01).
FIGURE 7Effects of different selenium concentrations on the maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of PSII after dark treatment of sweet potato. Different lowercase letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.05); Different capital letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.01).
FIGURE 8Effects of different selenium concentrations on potential activity (Fv/Fo) of PSII after dark treatment of sweet potato. Different lowercase letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.05); Different capital letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.01).
FIGURE 9Effects of different selenium concentrations on the distribution of selenium content in Shangshu19 and 20167-6. Different capital letters in the same category indicated that there were significant differences between Se treatments (Sig < 0.01).