| Literature DB >> 35873964 |
Ru Zhang1,2, Mingxu Zhang1, Yumei Yan1, Yuan Chen3, Linlin Jiang3, Xinxin Wei4, Xiaobo Zhang5, Huanting Li1, Minhui Li1,2,4,5,6.
Abstract
To provide high-quality Astragalus mongholicus Bunge to domestic and foreign markets and maintain sustainable development of the A. mongholicus industry, Firstly, we evaluated the impact of environmental factors and planting areas on the A. mongholicus industry. The maximum entropy method (MaxEnt) was utilized to simulate the suitability distribution of A. mongholicus and establish the relationship between the active component contents of A. mongholicus and ecological factors through linear regression analysis. The random forest algorithm was subsequently used to perform feature selection and classification extraction on Sentinel-2 imagery covering the study area. Furthermore, the planting, processing, and sales of A. mongholicus in Guyang County were investigated, and the roles of stakeholders in the value chains were analyzed. The results demonstrated that precipitation of the warmest quarter, minimum temperature of the coldest month, standard deviation of seasonal temperature changes, range of mean annual temperature, and mean diurnal range [mean of monthly (max temp - min temp)] were the five environmental variables that contributed the most to the growth of A. mongholicus. The most influential factor on the distribution of high-quality A. mongholicus was the mean temperature of the coldest quarter. The classification results of image features showed that the planting areas of A. mongholicus was consistent with the suitable planting areas predicted by MaxEnt, which can provide data support to the relevant departments for the macro development of the A. mongholicus industry. In the production of A. mongholicus, 10 value chains were constructed, and the study demonstrated that the behavior of stakeholders, target markets, and the selected planting area had a significant impact on the quality of A. mongholicus.Entities:
Keywords: Astragalus mongholicus Bunge; maximum entropy; random forest; remote sensing; species distribution models; value chains
Year: 2022 PMID: 35873964 PMCID: PMC9301113 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.908114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1The cultivated of Astragalus mongholicus (A); Details of A. mongholicus (B); dried roots A. mongholicus (C).
Figure 2Land cover map of Guyang County.
Spectral characteristic index set.
| Spectral region | Vegetation index | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Normalized vegetation index | NDVI | (B8-B4)/(B8 + B4) |
| Enhanced vegetation index | EVI | 2.5 × (B8-B4)/(B2 + 6 × B1 + 7.5 + B3 + 1) |
| Ratio vegetation index | RVI | B8/B4 |
| Red edge vegetation index 1 | NDVIre1 | (B8 − B5)/(B8 + B5) |
| Normalized difference vegetation index red-edge 1narrow | NDVIre 1n | (B8A − B5)/(B8A + B5) |
| Normalized difference vegetation index red-edge 2 | NDVIre 2 | (B8 − B6)/(B8 + B6) |
| Normalized difference vegetation index red-edge 2narrow | NDVIre 2n | (B8A − B6)/(B8A + B6) |
| Normalized difference vegetation index red-edge 3 | NDVIre 3 | (B8 − B7)/(B8 + B7) |
| Normalized difference vegetation index red-edge 3narrow | NDVIre 3n | (B8A − B7)/(B8A + B7) |
Figure 3ROC value of A. mongholicus modeled by MaxEnt based on distribution date.
Figure 4Ecological Suitability Regionalization of A. mongholicus in Guyang County.
Details of the 20 ecological factors used to predict Astragalus mongholicus distribution.
| Abbreviation | Name | Relative contribution | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIO1 | Mean annual temperature | 0.8% | Continuous |
| BIO2 | Mean Diurnal Range (Mean of monthly (max temp - min temp)) | 7.4% | Continuous |
| BIO3 | Isothermality | 0.5% | Continuous |
| BIO4 | Standard deviation of seasonal changes in temperature | 11% | Continuous |
| BIO5 | Maximum temperature of the warmest month | 0.6% | Continuous |
| BIO6 | Minimum temperature of the coldest month | 20.3% | Continuous |
| BIO7 | Range of mean annual temperature | 10.8% | Continuous |
| BIO8 | Mean temperature of the wettest quarter | 5.7% | Continuous |
| BIO9 | Mean temperature of the driest quarter | 0.9% | Continuous |
| BIO10 | Mean temperature of the warmest quarter | 0.4% | Continuous |
| BIO11 | Mean temperature of the coldest quarter | 0% | Continuous |
| BIO12 | Mean annual precipitation | 0.2% | Continuous |
| BIO13 | Precipitation of the wettest month | 2.3% | Continuous |
| BIO14 | Precipitation of the driest month | 6.1% | Continuous |
| BIO15 | Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation) | 1.2% | Continuous |
| BIO16 | Precipitation of the wettest quarter | 1.2% | Continuous |
| BIO17 | Precipitation of the driest quarter | 0.3% | Continuous |
| BIO18 | Precipitation of the warmest quarter | 26.6% | Continuous |
| BIO19 | Precipitation of the coldest quarter | 3.2% | Continuous |
| BIO20 | Altitude | 0.5% | Continuous |
Figure 5Regional suitability distribution of high-quality A. mongholicus in Guyang County. Its suitability was based on the content of astragaloside IV (A) and calycosin-7-glucoside (B).
Principal component analysis results of original bands in each month.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 1 | *********** |
|
| 2 | 198653.1435 |
|
| 3 | 50204.4439 | 99.85 |
| 4 | 7833.7430 | 99.91 |
| 5 | 5591.6879 | 99.95 |
| 6 | 3837.2299 | 99.98 |
| 7 | 1600.1198 | 99.99 |
| 8 | 823.2481 | 99.99 |
| 9 | 434.7474 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 402.0703 | 100.00 |
|
| ||
| 1 | *********** |
|
| 2 | 925510.1174 |
|
| 3 | 54794.9855 | 99.78 |
| 4 | 10584.4943 | 99.86 |
| 5 | 7311.4799 | 99.91 |
| 6 | 6335.4789 | 99.95 |
| 7 | 3513.3720 | 99.98 |
| 8 | 1921.6643 | 99.99 |
| 9 | 945.7515 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 577.5016 | 100.00 |
|
| ||
| 1 | *********** |
|
| 2 | 667177.0382 |
|
| 3 | 45269.5504 | 99.78 |
| 4 | 9327.8970 | 99.86 |
| 5 | 4539.5440 | 99.91 |
| 6 | 3432.8620 | 99.95 |
| 7 | 2540.6536 | 99.98 |
| 8 | 1691.1817 | 99.99 |
| 9 | 761.6588 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 352.9345 | 100.00 |
|
| ||
| 1 | *********** |
|
| 2 | 178696.0256 |
|
| 3 | 52125.5981 | 99.81 |
| 4 | 765.1415 | 99.88 |
| 5 | 5518.4661 | 99.93 |
| 6 | 4760.6366 | 99.97 |
| 7 | 1433.4957 | 99.98 |
| 8 | 1133.7566 | 99.99 |
| 9 | 559.6960 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 487.0376 | 100.00 |
|
| ||
| 1 | *********** |
|
| 2 | 102878.8513 |
|
| 3 | 46063.2139 | 99.73 |
| 4 | 16295.3402 | 99.86 |
| 5 | 7186.4223 | 99.92 |
| 6 | 4443.8691 | 99.96 |
| 7 | 2203.5974 | 99.98 |
| 8 | 1118.5134 | 99.99 |
| 9 | 1064.3939 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 598.6472 | 100.00 |
**** represents Eigenvalue, however, its data digits exceed the range displayed by ENVI, so the software output is ****.
Figure 6Comparison of random forest prediction results and ecological suitability distribution results.
Figure 7Six stages of A. mongholicus before reaching consumers.
Figure 8Primary VCs and stakeholders involved in A. mongholicus produce.
Figure 9Price forecast for 2021 (A); Price forecast for 2022 (B).