| Literature DB >> 35873882 |
Yuchan Li1, Jun Zhao1, Hua Chen1, Xia Yu2, Hui Li1, Yu Zhang1, Liang Feng1, Zhe Wu1, Wenlin Xie1, Dabin Hou1, Ma Yu1,3.
Abstract
Bupleurum chinense DC is an important medicinal plant with many active ingredients that are used for the treatment of different types of diseases and valued in pharmaceutical markets. In vitro shoot regeneration can efficiently contribute to the improvement of B. chinense. In the present study, we investigated the effects of the explant type and plant growth regulators (PGRs) on embryogenic callus induction and plant regeneration in B. chinense. Our investigation demonstrated that 2 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) combined with 1 mg/L thidiazuron (TDZ) played a major role in promoting callus induction from leaf, hypocotyl and stem 2 explants, whereas the most effective treatment for stem 1 callus formation was Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1 mg/L 2,4-D, 0.5 mg/L 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 0.5 mg/L kinetin (Kin). The highest shoot regeneration rate (57.14%) was obtained from hypocotyl-induced calli in MS medium with 0.5 mg/L Kin after 12 weeks of cultivation. This regeneration protocol can be used in large-scale cultivation and may be useful for future genetic modifications of B. chinense . © Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Bupleurum chinense; Callus induction; Explant type; Shoot regeneration
Year: 2022 PMID: 35873882 PMCID: PMC9288091 DOI: 10.1007/s11816-022-00772-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol Rep ISSN: 1863-5466 Impact factor: 2.496
Composition of plant growth regulators used for callus induction of B. chinense
| Medium | Plant grows regulators (mg/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,4-D | KT | BA | IAA | TDZ | NAA | |
| A | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||
| B | 1 | 1 | ||||
| C | 2 | 1 | ||||
| D | 3 | 0.5 | ||||
| E | 5 | 0.5 | ||||
| F | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
Fig. 1Effects of different medium on leaf callus induction. Bars represent the mean ± SE. Bars marked with different letters indicate statistically different values between the different medium on leaf callus induction according to Duncan’s test (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Effects of different medium on callus induction rate of different explants. Bars represent the mean ± SE, * indicate significant differences in callus induction rate among different explants in the same medium subjected to two-way ANOVA (P < 0.05) using GraphPad Prism v8.0
The fixed effect test of explant and medium type on callus formation of B. chinense
| Effect | Num DF | Den DF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explant | 3 | 28 | 1.59 | 0.2131 |
| Medium | 2 | 28 | 3.04 | 0.0639 |
| Explant * Medium | 6 | 28 | 4.59 | 0.0023 * |
Num DF, the numerator degrees of freedom for the F test for a fixed effect term. Den DF, the denominator degrees of freedom for the F test for a fixed effect term. Num DF and Den DF equal the number of parameters for the fixed effect term, * means the fixed factor term significantly affects the callus formation (P < 0.01)
The differences of Least Squares Means between interaction effects of Explant and Medium
| Effect 1(Explant * Medium) | LS means of effect 1 | Effect 2 (Explant * Medium) | LS means of effect 2 | Differences | Standard error | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stem 2*A | 33.30 | Leaf*C | 66.30 | −33 | 15.89 | −2.08 | 0.0471 |
| Stem 2*A | 33.30 | Stem 1*A | 78.75 | −45.45 | 19.81 | −2.29 | 0.0295 |
| Stem 2*A | 33.30 | Hypocotyl*C | 83.95 | −50.65 | 19.81 | −2.56 | 0.0163 |
| Stem 2*F | 43.13 | Leaf*A | 8.64 | 34.49 | 14.47 | 2.38 | 0.0242 |
| Stem 2*F | 43.13 | Hypocotyl*C | 83.95 | −40.82 | 18.09 | −2.26 | 0.032 |
| Stem 2*C | 47.20 | Leaf*A | 8.64 | 38.56 | 16.58 | 2.33 | 0.0275 |
| Leaf*A | 8.64 | Leaf*F | 65.06 | −56.42 | 11.6 | −4.86 | < .0001 |
| Leaf*A | 8.64 | Leaf*C | 66.30 | −57.66 | 11.6 | −4.97 | < .0001 |
| Leaf*A | 8.64 | Stem 1*A | 78.75 | −70.11 | 16.58 | −4.23 | 0.0002 |
| Leaf*A | 8.64 | Stem 1*C | 58.05 | −49.41 | 16.58 | −2.98 | 0.0059 |
| Leaf*A | 8.64 | Hypocotyl*A | 52.65 | −44.01 | 16.58 | −2.65 | 0.0129 |
| Leaf*A | 8.64 | Hypocotyl*F | 47.47 | −38.83 | 14.47 | −2.68 | 0.0121 |
| Leaf*A | 8.64 | Hypocotyl*C | 83.95 | −75.31 | 16.58 | −4.54 | < .0001 |
| Leaf*F | 65.06 | Stem 1*F | 32.50 | 32.56 | 13.67 | 2.38 | 0.0243 |
| Leaf*C | 66.30 | Stem 1*F | 32.50 | 33.8 | 13.67 | 2.47 | 0.0198 |
| Stem 1*A | 78.75 | Stem1*F | 32.50 | 46.25 | 18.09 | 2.56 | 0.0163 |
| Stem 1*F | 32.50 | Hypocotyl*C | 83.95 | −51.45 | 18.09 | −2.84 | 0.0082 |
LS means, Least Squares Means. Effect of “Explant * Medium” represents the interaction effect of Explant and Medium. Difference, difference between LS means of Effect 1 and LS means of Effect 2. The t test was used to check the significance of difference, and only significant differences listed in the table (P < 0.05)
Effect of plant growth regulators on hypocotyl callus differentiation of B. chinense
| PGRs | Concentration | Mean differentiation rate of hypocotyl calli (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 weeks | 8 weeks | 12 weeks | |||||
| Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | ||
| ZEA | 0.5 | 17.2 ± 3.92ab | 10.23 ± 4.90ab | 26.15 ± 6.39ab | 21.63 ± 5.00a | 31.14 ± 4.55ab | 90.37 ± 4.59 cd |
| 1 | 16.91 ± 1.87ab | 1.56 ± 1.46a | 26.17 ± 6.67ab | 9.16 ± 2.99a | 31.48 ± 4.50ab | 67.99 ± 6.19a | |
| 1.5 | 25.27 ± 5.62b | 3.87 ± 2.38ab | 25.86 ± 6.10ab | 27.29 ± 7.59a | 34.85 ± 4.09ab | 72.35 ± 5.67a | |
| Kin | 0.5 | 25.93 ± 4.91b | 8.73 ± 4.11ab | 33.29 ± 5.56ab | 16.88 ± 5.65a | 57.14 ± 4.98c | 97.92 ± 1.95d |
| 1 | 28.57 ± 3.77b | 3.70 ± 2.19ab | 35.71 ± 5.86b | 27.78 ± 8.47a | 47.86 ± 6.12bc | 88.57 ± 3.35bcd | |
| 1.5 | 22.31 ± 4.68ab | 9.26 ± 3.27ab | 28.13 ± 7.02ab | 30.51 ± 5.20a | 39.95 ± 4.68ab | 75.93 ± 5.30abc | |
| ABA | 0.5 | 8.71 ± 3.48a | 14.96 ± 5.55b | 17.86 ± 4.99ab | 25.69 ± 8.48a | 26.35 ± 7.97a | 70.16 ± 6.52a |
| 1 | 8.04 ± 4.10a | 5.65 ± 3.62ab | 13.10 ± 3.15a | 24.76 ± 5.93a | 28.71 ± 4.28a | 73.36 ± 4.97ab | |
| 1.5 | 13.99 ± 4.63ab | 7.22 ± 3.61ab | 20.65 ± 5.55ab | 24.70 ± 9.95a | 32.07 ± 2.74ab | 79.89 ± 2.87abc | |
Values are mean ± SE of 9 independent experiments, each experiment contains at least 6 explants. Means within each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test
Effect of plant growth regulators on rooting of callus from in B. chinense leaves
| PGRs | Concentration (mgl−1) | The root formation rate of leaf callus | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 weeks | 8 weeks | 12 weeks | ||
| ZEA | 0.5 | 18.89 ± 8.83ab | 20.83 ± 7.45abc | 30.00 ± 4.47ab |
| 1 | 9.00 ± 4.10a | 16.11 ± 6.11ab | 17.98 ± 7.58b | |
| 1.5 | 3.33 ± 2.98a | 6.67 ± 5.96a | 11.67 ± 6.50a | |
| Kin | 0.5 | 42.86 ± 6.39b | 49.61 ± 10.07c | 75.49 ± 7.71c |
| 1 | 25.67 ± 7.33ab | 32.33 ± 8.27abc | 64.90 ± 5.85bc | |
| 1.5 | 18.93 ± 8.14ab | 23.69 ± 10.24abc | 46.95 ± 5.67c | |
| ABA | 0.5 | 12.86 ± 0.194a | 25.83 ± 9.38abc | 44.44 ± 9.56bc |
| 1 | 26.21 ± 8.09ab | 44.90 ± 11.01bc | 63.98 ± 9.50c | |
| 1.5 | 10.22 ± 6.93a | 25.67 ± 7.3abc | 64.73 ± 7.61c | |
Values are mean ± SE of 9 independent experiments, each experiment contains at least 5 explants. Means within each column followed by same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test
Fig. 3The differentiation process of white globular embryogenic callus obtained from hypocotyl explant. a Shoot initiation from globular embryogenic callus (Scale bar indicates 2 mm). b Hypocotyl and radicle produced from globular embryogenic callus (Scale bar indicates 2 mm). c Embryoids develop into complete plants (Scale bar indicates 2 mm). d Plant produced by embryoids elongate further (Scale bar indicates 1 cm)
Fig. 4The differentiation process of green embryogenic calli obtained from hypocotyl explant. a-d Embryogenic callus at globular, heart-shaped, torpedo, and cotyledonary stages (Scale bar indicates 500 μm). e General view of green embryogenic callus obtained on differentiation medium (Scale bar indicates 1 mm). f Shoots induced from hypocotyl callus 8 weeks after initiating differentiation, the shoots and root elongated further (Scale bar indicates 1 cm)
Effects of plant growth regulators on regeneration of shoots from hypocotyl callus after 4 weeks of culture
| PGRs | Concentration | Total calli | Number of calli that differentiated shoots | Number of level-1 differentiated calli | Number of level-2 differentiated calli | Number of level-3 differentiated calli |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZEA | 0.5 | 58 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| 1 | 59 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1.5 | 55 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | |
| Kin | 0.5 | 58 | 17 | 8 | 6 | 3 |
| 1 | 62 | 16 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
| 1.5 | 67 | 15 | 6 | 6 | 3 | |
| ABA | 0.5 | 57 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 53 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.5 | 53 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Calli with fewer than 5 regenerated buds were defined as level-1 differentiated calli (length > 3 mm), calli with 5–10 regenerated buds were defined as level-2 differentiated calli (length > 3 mm), and calli with more than 10 regenerated buds were defined as level-3 differentiated calli (length > 3 mm)
Effects of plant growth regulators on regeneration of shoots from hypocotyl callus after 8 weeks of culture
| PGRs | Concentration | Total calli | Number of calli that differentiated shoots | Number of level-1 differentiated calli | Number of level-2 differentiated calli | Number of level-3 differentiated calli |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZEA | 0.5 | 69 | 18 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| 1 | 57 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 1.5 | 58 | 16 | 3 | 7 | 6 | |
| Kin | 0.5 | 70 | 23 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| 1 | 52 | 19 | 5 | 6 | 8 | |
| 1.5 | 62 | 18 | 4 | 6 | 8 | |
| ABA | 0.5 | 63 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 1 | 61 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| 1.5 | 55 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
Calli with fewer than 5 regenerated buds were defined as level-1 differentiated calli (length > 3 mm), calli with 5–10 regenerated buds were defined as level-2 differentiated calli (length > 3 mm), and calli with more than 10 regenerated buds were defined as level-3 differentiated calli (length > 3 mm)
Effects of plant growth regulators on regeneration of shoots from hypocotyl callus after 12 weeks of culture
| PGRs | Concentration (mgl−1) | Total calli | Number of calli that differentiated shoots | Number of level-1 differentiated calli | Number of level-2 differentiated calli | Number of level-3 differentiated calli |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZEA | 0.5 | 89 | 27 | 7 | 9 | 11 |
| 1 | 60 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 8 | |
| 1.5 | 62 | 21 | 5 | 7 | 9 | |
| Kin | 0.5 | 67 | 37 | 8 | 10 | 19 |
| 1 | 61 | 29 | 7 | 8 | 14 | |
| 1.5 | 70 | 26 | 8 | 6 | 12 | |
| ABA | 0.5 | 61 | 18 | 3 | 7 | 8 |
| 1 | 65 | 18 | 4 | 6 | 8 | |
| 1.5 | 62 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
Calli with fewer than 5 regenerated buds were defined as level-1 differentiated calli (length > 3 mm), calli with 5–10 regenerated buds were defined as level-2 differentiated calli (length > 3 mm), and calli with more than 10 regenerated buds were defined as level-3 differentiated calli (length > 3 mm)
Fig. 5Example of calli grading standard. a One-level differentiation calli (calli with fewer than 5 regenerated buds). b Two-level differentiation calli (calli with 5–10 regenerated buds). c Three-level differentiation calli (calli with more than 10 regenerated buds. a-c, Scale bar indicates 1 cm)