| Literature DB >> 35873593 |
Shanqing He1,2,3, Yajun Yao1,2,3, Nan Yang4, Youcheng Wang1,2,3, Dishiwen Liu1,2,3, Zhen Cao1,2,3, Huiyu Chen1,2,3, Yuntao Fu1,2,3, Mei Yang1,2,3, Songjun Wang5, Guangjie He4, Qingyan Zhao1,2,3.
Abstract
Background: Methamphetamine (METH)-induced cardiovascular toxicity has been attributed to its destructive effect on mitochondrial function at least to some extent. Previous studies highlighted the benefits of dapagliflozin (DAPA) on the cardiovascular system, but the response of METH-induced cardiomyopathy to DAPA is never addressed before. The present study aimed to investigate the potential ability of DAPA in preventing METH-induced cardiomyopathy. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: apoptosis; cardiomyopathy; dapagliflozin; methamphetamine; mitochondrial
Year: 2022 PMID: 35873593 PMCID: PMC9301370 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.925276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1Experimental protocol. Diagram illustrating the experimental protocol of this study. i.p., intraperitoneal injection; NSS, normal saline solution; i.g., intragastric injection; TIW, three times a week.
FIGURE 2Echocardiography and cardiac remodeling. (A) Representative echocardiography in the three groups; LVIDd and LVIDs are shown in white lines. (B) Representative Masson’s trichrome in the ventricle of each group. The collagen fibers were stained in blue. (C) Quantitative analysis of Masson’s trichrome in each group. (D) and (E) Serum NE and BNP concentrations in each group. (F) and (G) %LVEF and %LVFS in each group. (H) and (I) LVIDs and LVIDd in each group. (J) and (K) LVPWs and LVPWd in each group. * p < 0.05 vs. the control group, ** p < 0.01 vs. the control group. # p < 0.05 vs. the METH group, ## p < 0.01 vs. the METH group. METH, methamphetamine; DAPA, dapagliflozin; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVFS, left ventricular fraction shortening; LVIDd, left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole; LVIDs, left ventricular internal diameter at end-systolic; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end diastole; LVPWs, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end systole; NE, noradrenaline; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide.
FIGURE 3Oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. (A) Representative electron microscope photographs from the three groups. Mice in the METH group showed the rupture of mitochondrial cristae (white arrow) compared with the control group and METH + DAPA group. (B) Representative bands of the expression of the mitochondrial protein MFN2 and FIS1 in each group. (C) and (D) Quantitative analysis of the expression of the mitochondrial protein MFN2 and FIS1 in each group. (E) Representative ROS staining in each group. ROS was stained red by DHE. (F) Quantitative analysis of ROS staining. ROS staining was quantified in terms of DHE positive cells/total cells. (G) Representative figure of JC-1 staining. Red fluorescence intensity represents the number of aggregate mitochondria, while green fluorescence intensity represents the number of monomeric mitochondria. (H) Quantitative analysis of JC-1 staining according to the red optical density/green optical density. * p < 0.05 vs. the control group, ** p < 0.01 vs. the control group. *p < 0.05 vs. the METH group, ## p < 0.01 vs. the METH group. ROS, reactive oxygen species; METH, methamphetamine; DAPA, dapagliflozin; ROS, reactive oxygen species; DHE, Dihydroethidium; MFN2, mitochondrial fusion protein 2; FIS1, fission1.
FIGURE 4Myocardial apoptosis. (A) Representative TUNEL-α-actinin immunofluorescence double staining in each group. The myocardial cells were labeled with α-actinin and stained red, while the apoptotic nuclei were stained green. (B) Quantitative analysis of TUNEL staining by FITC/DAPI in each group. (C) Representative bands of Bax and Bcl-2 in each group. (D) and (E) Quantitative analysis of Bax and Bcl-2 expression in each group. ** p < 0.01 vs. the control group. # p < 0.05 vs. the METH group, ## p < 0.01 vs. the METH group. METH, methamphetamine; DAPA, dapagliflozin; Bax, Bcl-Associated X; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma-2.
FIGURE 5Signaling pathway protein expression. (A) Representative image of cleaved caspase3 by immunohistochemistry in each group. (B) Quantitative analysis of cleaved caspase3 by immunohistochemistry in each group. (C) Representative image of GRP78 by immunohistochemistry in each group. (D) Quantitative analysis of GRP78 by immunohistochemistry in each group. (E) Representative bands of cleaved caspase3 and caspase9 in each group. (F) and (G) Quantitative analysis of the expression of cleaved caspase3 and caspase9 in each group. (H) Representative bands of Cyt-C, cIAP1 in each group. (I) and (J) Quantitative analysis of the expression of Cyt-C and cIAP1 in each group. * p < 0.05 vs. the control group, ** p < 0.01 vs. the control group.# p < 0.05 vs. the METH group, ## p < 0.01 vs. the METH group. METH, methamphetamine; DAPA, dapagliflozin; cl-caspase3, cleaved caspase3; GRP78, glucose regulated protein; Cyt-C, cytochrome C; cIAP1, inhibitor of apoptosis 1.