| Literature DB >> 35873224 |
Qing Wang1, Jie Yu1, Yuanmeng Tang1, Jing Luo1, Baoguo Shi1.
Abstract
Background: A large rural labor force has been attracted to urban areas with the acceleration of urbanization in China. This significant change in environment for migrant children from rural to urban may lead to psychological problems, such as decreased subjective wellbeing (WB) and increased perceived discrimination (PD). However, previous studies have focused on the influence of PD on WB by using a cross-sectional design, ignoring the causality and intrinsic mechanisms between WB and PD. The current study investigates the causal association and internal relations between migrant children's PD and WB.Entities:
Keywords: migrant children; perceived discrimination; school type; self-esteem; wellbeing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35873224 PMCID: PMC9305607 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 5.435
FIGURE 1The proposed moderated mediation model. (A) The moderated mediation model of perceived discrimination to well-being; (B) the moderated mediation model of well-being to perceived discrimination.
Descriptive statistics and partial correlations between variables (N = 466).
|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1. T1 WB | 9.89 (3.27) | 1 | ||||
| 2. T2 WB | 9.81 (3.41) | 0.30 | 1 | |||
| 3. T1 PD | 48.06 (11.26) | −0.30 | −0.17 | 1 | ||
| 4. T2 PD | 45.84 (12.44) | −0.36 | −0.26 | 0.54 | 1 | |
| 5. T1 SE | 28.45(3.78) | 0.30 | 0.19 | −0.42 | −0.32 | 1 |
PD, Perceived discrimination; WB, Wellbeing; SE, Self-esteem; T1, Time 1; T2, Time 2; ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 2Cross-lagged model of perceived discrimination and wellbeing. PD, Perceived discrimination; WB, Wellbeing; T1, Time 1; T2, Time 2; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Testing the mediating effect of self-esteem (T1) on perceived discrimination (T2).
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| β |
|
|
| β |
|
|
| β |
|
|
| |
| T1 WB | –0.35 | −8.11 | –0.42 | –0.28 | 0.30 | 6.78 | 0.23 | 0.37 | –0.28 | −6.25 | –0.36 | –0.21 |
| T1 SE | –0.22 | −4.89 | –0.30 | –0.15 | ||||||||
|
| 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.26 | |||||||||
|
| 5.91 | 4.07 | 6.91 | |||||||||
All models controlled for gender, age, SES; PD, Perceived discrimination; WB, Wellbeing; SE, Self-esteem; T1, Time 1; T2, Time 2; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Testing the moderated mediation effect of wellbeing (T1) on perceived discrimination (T2).
| Predictors | T1 SE | T2 PD | |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||
| β |
|
|
| β |
|
|
| ||||
| T1 WB | 0.76 | 4.82 | 0.50 | 1.02 | –0.27 | –1.89 | –0.53 | –0.03 | |||
| ST | 0.53 | 3.34 | 0.27 | 0.79 | –0.20 | –0.68 | –0.65 | 0.26 | |||
| T1 WB × ST | –0.49 | –2.73 | –0.78 | –0.19 | 0.16 | 0.88 | –0.11 | 0.43 | |||
| T1 SE | –0.40 | –3.76 | –0.57 | –0.22 | |||||||
| T1 SE × ST | 0.42 | 1.42 | –0.07 | 0.91 | |||||||
|
| 0.15 | 0.43 | |||||||||
|
| 4.68 | 5.68 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Public school | –0.14 | 0.04 | –3.98 | –0.20 | –0.08 | ||||||
| Migrant children’ school | –0.05 | 0.02 | –2.21 | –0.09 | –0.01 | ||||||
All models controlled for gender, age, SES; PD, Perceived discrimination; WB, Wellbeing; ST, School type; SE, Self-esteem; T1, Time 1; T2, Time 2; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3School type moderates the relationship between self-esteem (T1) and wellbeing (T1) for public school and migrant school children.