Literature DB >> 35873132

Performance of the EuroSCORE II Model in Predicting Short-Term Mortality of General Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Center Study in Taiwan.

Pin-Hung Liu1, Hsin-Hung Shih2, Pei-Leun Kang1, Jun-Yen Pan1, Tung-Ho Wu1, Chieh-Jen Wu1.   

Abstract

Background: The latest European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II is a well-accepted risk evaluation system for mortality in cardiac surgery in Europe.
Objectives: To determine the performance of this new model in Taiwanese patients.
Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2014, 657 patients underwent cardiac surgery at our institution. The EuroSCORE II scores of all patients were determined preoperatively. The short-term surgical outcomes of 30-day and in-hospital mortality were evaluated to assess the performance of the EuroSCORE II.
Results: Of the 657 patients [192 women (29.22%); age 63.5 ± 12.68 years], the 30-day mortality rate was 5.48%, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 9.28%. The discrimination power of this new model was good in all populations, regardless of 30-day mortality or in-hospital mortality. Good accuracy was also noted in different procedures related to coronary artery bypass grafting, and good calibration was noted for cardiac procedures (p value > 0.05). When predicting surgical death within 30 days, the EuroSCORE II overestimated the risk (observed to expected: 0.79), but in-hospital mortality was underestimated (observed to expected: 1.33). The predictive ability [area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve] and calibration of the EuroSCORE II for 30-day mortality (0.792) and in-hospital mortality (0.825) suggested that in-hospital mortality is a better endpoint for the EuroSCORE II. Conclusions: The new EuroSCORE II model performed well in predicting short-term outcomes among patients undergoing general cardiac surgeries. For short-term outcomes, in-hospital mortality was better than 30-day mortality as an indicator of surgical results, suggesting that it may be a better endpoint for the EuroSCORE II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  30-day mortality; Cardiac surgery; EuroSCORE II; In-hospital mortality; Risk evaluation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35873132      PMCID: PMC9295035          DOI: 10.6515/ACS.202207_38(4).20220128B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin        ISSN: 1011-6842            Impact factor:   1.800


  25 in total

1.  Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients.

Authors:  F Roques; S A Nashef; P Michel; E Gauducheau; C de Vincentiis; E Baudet; J Cortina; M David; A Faichney; F Gabrielle; E Gams; A Harjula; M T Jones; P P Pintor; R Salamon; L Thulin
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Validation of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Francesco Vasques; Reija Mikkola; Marta Martin; Jarmo Lahtinen; Jouni Heikkinen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  EuroSCORE II.

Authors:  Samer A M Nashef; François Roques; Linda D Sharples; Johan Nilsson; Christopher Smith; Antony R Goldstone; Ulf Lockowandt
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Performance of the EuroSCORE II and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  K Kuwaki; H Inaba; T Yamamoto; S Dohi; T Matsumura; T Morita; A Amano
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.888

Review 5.  Performance of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II: a meta-analysis of 22 studies involving 145,592 cardiac surgery procedures.

Authors:  Pietro Guida; Florinda Mastro; Giuseppe Scrascia; Richard Whitlock; Domenico Paparella
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Consecutive Observational Study to Validate EuroSCORE II Performances on a Single-Center, Contemporary Cardiac Surgical Cohort.

Authors:  Dusko Nezic; Tatjana Spasic; Slobodan Micovic; Dragana Kosevic; Ivana Petrovic; Ljiljana Lausevic-Vuk; Dragana Unic-Stojanovic; Milorad Borzanovic
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery: external validation of EuroSCORE II in a prospective regional registry.

Authors:  Domenico Paparella; Pietro Guida; Giuseppe Di Eusanio; Sergio Caparrotti; Renato Gregorini; Mauro Cassese; Vitantonio Fanelli; Giuseppe Speziale; Valerio Mazzei; Salvatore Zaccaria; Luigi De Luca Tupputi Schinosa; Tommaso Fiore
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Validation of the EuroSCORE model in Australia.

Authors:  Cheng-Hon Yap; Christopher Reid; Michael Yii; Michael A Rowland; Morteza Mohajeri; Peter D Skillington; Siven Seevanayagam; Julian A Smith
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 4.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.