| Literature DB >> 35872436 |
Qihui Niu1, Jianyu Li2, Lei Yang1, Zitong Huang2, Mingmin Niu3, Xueqin Song1, Yuanchao Zhang4, Youhui Li5.
Abstract
Intracortical myelin is involved in speeding and synchronizing neural activity of the cerebral cortex and has been found to be disrupted in various psychiatric disorders. However, its role in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has remained unknown. In this study, we investigated the alterations in intracortical myelin and their association with white matter (WM) microstructural abnormalities in OCD. T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted brain images were obtained for 51 medication-naïve patients with OCD and 26 healthy controls (HCs). The grey/white matter contrast (GWC) was calculated from T1-weighted signal intensities to characterize the intracortical myelin profile in OCD. Diffusion parameters, including fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD), were extracted from diffusion-weighted images to examine the WM microstructure in OCD. Compared with HCs, patients with OCD showed increased GWC in the bilateral orbitofrontal, cuneus, lingual and fusiform gyrus, left anterior cingulate, left superior parietal, right inferior parietal, and right middle frontal cortices, suggesting reduced intracortical myelin. Patients with OCD also showed decreased FA in several WM regions, with a topology corresponding to the GWC alterations. In both groups, the mean GWC of the significant clusters in between-group GWC analysis was correlated negatively with the mean FA of the significant clusters in between-group FA analysis. In patients with OCD, the FA of a cluster in the right cerebellum correlated negatively with the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale scores. Our results suggest that abnormal intracortical and WM myelination could be the microstructural basis for the brain connectivity alterations and disrupted inhibitory control in OCD.Entities:
Keywords: Gray/white matter contrast; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; White matter microstructure
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35872436 PMCID: PMC9421450 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.891
Demographic and clinical data for patients with OCD and HCs.
| OCD (n = 51) | HCs (n = 26) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 23.02 ± 9.22 | 26.42 ± 6.04 | 0.093 |
| Gender (male/female) | 28/23 | 11/15 | 0.296 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 21.13 ± 2.85 | 20.60 ± 2.11 | 0.402 |
| Education (years) | 13.47 ± 2.70 | 14.42 ± 1.63 | 0.103 |
| Duration of illness (months) | 41.84 ± 43.94 | NA | |
| Y-BOCS score | 22.69 ± 6.64 | NA | |
| Obsessive subscale score | 11.88 ± 3.57 | NA | |
| Compulsive subscale score | 10.80 ± 3.68 | NA | |
| HAMD score | 13.39 ± 3.58 | NA | |
| HAMA score | 9.04 ± 3.27 | NA |
Note: Data represent mean ± standard deviation. Between-group differences in age, BMI and education were tested using an independent two-sample t-test. Between-group difference in gender was tested using a chi-square test. BMI, Body Mass Index; NA, not applicable.
Y-BOCS, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale. The scores of this scale can be interpreted as follows: 0–7, subclinical OCD; 8–15, mild symptoms; 16–23, moderate symptoms; 24–31, severe symptoms; and 32–40, extreme symptoms.
HAMD, Hamilton Depression Scale. The scores of this scale can be interpreted as follows: 0–7, no depression; 8–20, Symptoms of depression may be present; 20–35, Mild or moderate depressive symptoms; and greater than 35, severe depression.
HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale. The scores of this scale can be interpreted as follows: 0–6 no anxiety; 7–14, symptoms of anxiety may be present; 15–21, there must be anxiety; 22–28, obvious anxiety; and greater than 29, severe anxiety.
Fig. 1Brain regions with increased GWC in patients with OCD compared with HCs. The results were RFT-corrected for multiple comparisons. The color bar denotes the t-value of the contrast.
Fig. 2Brain regions with decreased FA in patients with OCD compared with HCs. The results were GRF-corrected for multiple comparisons. The color bar denotes the t value of the contrast.
Fig. 3Negative correlations between GWC and FA in patients with OCD and HCs.
Fig. 4Brain regions showing a negative correlation between FA and Y-BOCS in patients with OCD. The color bar denotes the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.