Literature DB >> 35871678

The influence of strong and weak ties in physician peer networks on new drug adoption.

Yong Cai1, Mohamed Abouzahra2.   

Abstract

Physicians interact and exchange information through various social networks. Understanding peer effects through different networks can help accelerate new medical technology and innovative treatment adoption. In this research, we measure the influence of strong-tie and weak-tie connections on new drug adoption and study the overlap between advice-discussion and patient-sharing network. We construct two physician networks with strong and weak ties from peer nomination surveys and commercial medical claims data. We design a dynamic system to define peer adoption status and build patient-level hierarchical logistic models to measure the peer influence on new product adoption for treating new-to-therapy patients. Our results show that A strong-tie early adoption peer has six times more influence on new drug adoption than a weak-tie peer. Weak tie peers collectively exert as much or higher influence than strong-tie peers because of the larger network size. In the case of inaccessibility to strong-tie data, researchers can still reliably use the influence of the weak tie data only even though they will lose the effect of the omitted strong ties.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adoption; Peer influence; Physician network; Strong tie; Weak tie

Year:  2022        PMID: 35871678     DOI: 10.1007/s10754-022-09335-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag        ISSN: 2199-9031


  7 in total

1.  Physician's peer exposure and the adoption of a new cancer treatment modality.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Pamela R Soulos; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Subspecialty distributions of ophthalmologists in the workforce.

Authors:  P P Lee; D A Relles; C A Jackson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-07

3.  Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models.

Authors:  Edward C Norton; Bryan E Dowd
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Mapping physician networks with self-reported and administrative data.

Authors:  Michael L Barnett; Bruce E Landon; A James O'Malley; Nancy L Keating; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  A scoping review of patient-sharing network studies using administrative data.

Authors:  Eva H DuGoff; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Gary E Weissman; Joseph H Huntley; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs.

Authors:  Julie M Donohue; Hasan Guclu; Walid F Gellad; Chung-Chou H Chang; Haiden A Huskamp; Niteesh K Choudhry; Ruoxin Zhang; Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic; Stefanie P Junker; Timothy Anderson; Seth Richards-Shubik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Association of Physician Peer Influence With Subsequent Physician Adoption and Use of Bevacizumab.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; A James O'Malley; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Stacy W Gray; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.