| Literature DB >> 35869452 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Finger collateral ligament injuries are common, and conservative treatment usually works well. However, complete ruptures that lead to instability could cause painful disability. This study presents our clinical experience and a qualitative functional evaluation following the surgical repair of the thumb and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint collateral ligament ruptures.Entities:
Keywords: Collateral ligament repair; Finger injury; Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint collateral ligament injury; Suture anchor; Thumb collateral ligament injury
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35869452 PMCID: PMC9306151 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05605-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.562
Fig. 1a The intraoperative photo, notice the White arrow that demonstrates the thumb UCL rupture. b. white arrow demonstrates the stiches at repair side that represent direct repair
Fig. 2a The intraoperative photo, notice the red arrow that demonstrates the 4.th finger RCL rupture. b white arrow demonstrates the stiches at repair side that represent direct repair. c The post operative photo at 1. Year follow up, demostrates the full extension. d The post operative photo at 1. Year follow up, demostrates the full felxion of the.4th finger. e The post operative l photo at 1. Year follow up, demostrates the finger appearence
Fig. 3a The pre operative MRI that demonstrates the forth finger RCL rupture. b The intraoperative photo, notice the arrow that demonstrates the 4.th finger RCL rupture. c The intraoperative photo notice the white arrow that demostrates the suture anchore augmented repair. d The intraoperative photo notice the white arrow that demostrates the completed repair side
The statisticsa that depicts the improvement of visual analog scale after the treatment
| Fingers | post_VAS—pre_VAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thumb | Z | -3.550b | |
| aAsymp. Sig. (2-tailed) | 0,002 | significant | |
| Lesser digits | Z | -3.787b | |
| aAsymp. Sig. (2-tailed) | <0,001 | significant | |
The improvement of pain (VAS) after the surgical repair was found to be statistically significant for both thumb and lesser digits (p < 0.005)
aWilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
bBased on positive ranks
Fig. 4a The intraoperative photo, notice the white arrow that demonstrates the 2th finger UCL rupture. b The intraoperative photo, notice the rwhite arrow that demonstrates the 2th finger UCL rupture. c. White arrow demonstrates the stiches at repair side that represent direct repair. d The Intra operative photo demostrates the appearence of the finger after completing the repair. e The Intra operative photo demostrates the appearence of the finger after completing the repair. f The post operative photo at 1. year follow up, demostrates the full extension with mild deformity of the 2th finger. g The post operative l photo at 1. year follow up, demostrates mild flexion limitation of the 2.th finger
Classification of papers regarding thumb, lesser digits, and setting to chronic, acute
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCL | RCL | UCL+RCL | MCP+ PIP | ||||
| 1 | Christensen T et al. Hand (N Y). 2016 [ | Chronic Thumb UCL | |||||
| 2 | Kara et al. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019 [ | Acute Thumb UCL | |||||
| 3 | Catalano LW 3rd et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2006 [ | Chronic RCL Thumb | |||||
| 4 | Chuter et al. Injury.2009. [ | Acute UCL thumb | |||||
| 5 | Glickel et al. J Hand Surg Am. 1993 [ | Chronic UCL Thumb | |||||
| 6 | Gvozdenovic and Boeckstyns. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2014 [ |
| |||||
| 7 | Katolik et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 [ | Acute UCL thumb. | |||||
| 8 | Moharram AN. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 [ | Acute or Delayed cases. 27 UCL Thumb | |||||
| 9 | Saetta et al. J Hand Surg Br. 1992 [ | Acute 25 UCL Thumb. | |||||
| 10 | Lee et al. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 [ | Seven patient non-op and 10 patient PIP collateral lig repair. | |||||
| 11 | Waxweiler C et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 [ | Acute and Chronic 46 MCP lesser digits. | |||||
| 12 | Vigasio A et al. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012 [ | MCP lesser digit | |||||
| 13 | Lee et al. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 [ | Chronic 7-UCL+1 RCL thumb and 3 PIP | |||||
| 14 | Tuncay and Ege Croat Med J. 2001 [ | Chronic; 6 Thumbs MCP -2 fifth finger PIP ) | |||||
| 15 | Kato H et al. J Hand Surg Br. 1999 [ | Acute, 7 Thumb and 11 PİP joint. | |||||
| 16 | Kato et al. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003 [ | Not determined. PİP joint collateral ligament. | |||||
| 17 | Ali MS. J Hand Surg Br. 1984 [ | Acute. PİP joint | |||||
| 18 | Wong JC et al. Hand (N Y). 2014 [ | Subacute-to ChronicLesser digits’MCP collateteral. | |||||
| 19 | Current Report |
| 35 patients.19 Lesser digit PİP collarela ligament + 16 Thumb MCP collateral ligaments | ||||
Fig. 5List of publications on number of patients
Fig. 6List of publications on follow up time