Literature DB >> 35869215

Evaluation of maximum dose intravenous midazolam used in dental intravenous sedation: a West of Scotland regional audit.

Hannah Lawler1, Peter Walker2.   

Abstract

Background Intravenous (IV) midazolam sedation is commonly used in the delivery of dentistry for phobic patients. There is currently no guidance on a maximum dose for use specifically in dentistry. Dentists practise with the British National Formulary recommended maximum dose of 7.5 mg; however, anecdotally, this is often exceeded. We aim to evaluate prescribing and propose recommendations for a maximum dose for dentists.Method Data was collected from ten dentists across four Scottish health boards regarding their last 20 IV sedation patients, giving a total of 200. Data obtained from standard Dental Sedation Teachers Group IV logbooks included: dose of midazolam administered; justification for doses over 7.5 mg; flumazenil or supplemental oxygen usage; significant medical/social factors; and the Ramsay Sedation Score.Results Mean midazolam dose was 6.1 mg with a range of 14 mg. The recommended maximum dose of 7.5 mg was exceeded in 28% of cases. The mean sedation score was 2.7 and there were no reported adverse events or use of flumazenil.Conclusion IV midazolam is an effective way to achieve conscious sedation in dentistry. Acknowledgement of current off-label prescribing is important; however, 7.5 mg as a recommended maximum dose is too conservative as it is regularly exceeded without adverse events. Further investigation and expert opinion is required to set a maximum dose specifically for dentistry.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the British Dental Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35869215      PMCID: PMC9305050          DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-4456-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   2.727


  8 in total

1.  Clinical management of the dental patient taking multiple drugs.

Authors:  Peter L Jacobsen; Elisa M Chávez
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2005-11-15

2.  Risk factors for hypoxemia during ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy in ASA I-II patients.

Authors:  Mohammed A Qadeer; A Rocio Lopez; John A Dumot; John J Vargo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Ramsay Sedation Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Akram M Rasheed; Mohammad F Amirah; Mohammad Abdallah; Parameaswari P J; Marwan Issa; Abdulrhman Alharthy
Journal:  Dimens Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr

4.  Comparison of patient-controlled and operator-controlled conscious sedation for restorative dentistry.

Authors:  K A Bavisha; M Elias; S Paris; A R Leon; P J Flynn
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  I.v. sedation for conservative dentistry. A comparison of midazolam and diazepam.

Authors:  I Barker; D G Butchart; J Gibson; J I Lawson; N Mackenzie
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  A Clinical Audit of Escorts' Awareness And Patients' Safety Following Intravenous Sedation In Adult Oral Surgery.

Authors:  Luca Licheri; Matteo Erriu; Vincenzo Bryant; Vincenzo Piras
Journal:  SAAD Dig       Date:  2016-01

7.  A comparison of the 'cost per child treated' at a primary care-based sedation referral service, compared to a general anaesthetic in hospital.

Authors:  K Jameson; P A Averley; P Shackley; J Steele
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 8.  Seminars on controversial issues. A review of the pharmacological approach to the management of dental anxiety in children.

Authors:  M O Folayan; A Faponle; A Lamikanra
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.455

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.