| Literature DB >> 35869075 |
Àlex-González Segura1,2, Llucia Prohens1,2, Gisela Mezquida1,2,3,4, Silvia Amoretti2,3,4, Miquel Bioque2,3,4,5, María Ribeiro6,7, Xaquin Gurriarán-Bas4,8, Lide Rementería9,10,11, Daniel Berge4,12,13, Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez4,14,15, Alexandra Roldán16, Edith Pomarol-Clotet4,17, Angela Ibáñez4,18, Judith Usall19, Maria Paz García-Portilla4,20,21, Manuel J Cuesta4,6,7, Mara Parellada4,8, Ana González-Pinto4,9,10,11, Esther Berrocoso4,22,23, Miquel Bernardo24,25,26,27, Sergi Mas28,29,30.
Abstract
The main objective of the present study was to investigate the association between several epigenetic clocks, covering different aspects of aging, with schizophrenia relapse evaluated over a 3-year follow-up period in a cohort of ninety-one first-episode schizophrenia patients. Genome-wide DNA methylation was profiled and four epigenetic clocks, including epigenetic clocks of chronological age, mortality and telomere length were calculated. Patients that relapsed during the follow-up showed epigenetic acceleration of the telomere length clock (p = 0.030). Shorter telomere length was associated with cognitive performance (working memory, r = 0.31 p = 0.015; verbal fluency, r = 0.28 p = 0.028), but no direct effect of cognitive function or symptom severity on relapse was detected. The results of the present study suggest that epigenetic age acceleration could be involved in the clinical course of schizophrenia and could be a useful marker of relapse when measured in remission stages.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35869075 PMCID: PMC9307769 DOI: 10.1038/s41537-022-00268-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Schizophrenia (Heidelb) ISSN: 2754-6993
Demographic, clinical and cognitive data at baseline of the 91 participants in the study, classified as non-relapse (those patients that had not experienced a relapse after 3 years of enrollment) or relapse (those patients that relapsed during the 3-year follow-up).
| Non-Relapse | Relapse | Statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49 | 42 | ||
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 26.6 ± 5.8 | 25.9 ± 5.9 | t89 = 0.60 |
| Age at first diagnosis (years), mean ± SD | 24.9 ± 5.6 | 24.7 ± 5.8 | t88 = 0.19 |
| Time since first episode (years), mean ± SD | 1.67 ± 1.44 | 0.90 ± 1.06 | t89 = 2.82, |
| Gender, male, | 38 (77.6) | 27 (64.3) | X21 = 1.95 |
| Ethnicity, Caucasian, | 44 (89.8) | 36 (85.7) | X21 = 1.81 |
| Cannabis use, | 5 (10.4) | 8 (19.0) | X21 = 1.35 |
| Tobacco use, | 24 (49.0) | 24 (57.1) | X21 = 0.60 |
| Alcohol use, | 18 (36.7) | 21 (50.0) | X21 = 1.65 |
| Antipsychotic CEDD, mean ± SD | 254.8 ± 228.9 | 302.2 ± 305.8 | t89 = −0.84 |
| Symptomatology | |||
| Marder Positive symptoms, mean ± SD | 11.6 ± 3.5 | 11.5 ± 3.9 | t89 = 0.15 |
| Marder Negative symptoms, mean ± SD | 14.2 ± 5.1 | 13.1 ± 5.6 | t89 = 0.97 |
| Cognitive Domains1 | |||
| Working memory, mean ± SD | 77.8 ± 15.1 | 73.9 ± 14.2 | t88 = 1.24 |
| Verbal memory, mean ± SD | 237.7 ± 68.9 | 221.4 ± 69.9 | t86 = 1.07 |
| Executive function, mean ± SD | 224.2 ± 34.5 | 228.5 ± 33.4 | t75 = −0.47 |
| Visual memory, mean ± SD | 88.4 ± 27.3 | 82.5 ± 23.7 | t87 = 1.06 |
| Verbal fluency, mean ± SD | 65.3 ± 15.2 | 62.0 ± 9.9 | t87 = 1.18 |
| Sustained attention, mean ± SD | 125.2 ± 22.6 | 135.3 ± 32.6 | t83 = −1.67 |
| Processing speed, mean ± SD | 68.1 ± 19.2 | 62.3 ± 17.8 | t88 = 1.48 |
| Cognitive reserve, mean ± SD | 61.4 ± 9.2 | 60.0 ± 7.6 | t83 = 0.79 |
CEDD, chlorpromazine equivalent daily dose.
1Identified through the principal components analysis.
Fig. 1Epigentic age correlations and IEAA in relapse.
A Correlation coefficient between the measured epigenetic clocks of chronological age (Horvath and Hannun clocks), mortality (PhenoAge) and telomere length (DNAmTL) and chronological age. (***p < 0.001). B Average IEAA of the measured epigenetic clocks of chronological age (Horvath and Hannun clocks), mortality (PhenoAge) and telomere length (DNAmTL) between patients that relapse (R) and those that do not relapse (NR).
Fig. 2EEAA in relapse.
Average EEAA of the epigenetic clocks (mean ± SD) (A) and chronological age compared to DNAm Age or telomere length (B) between patients that relapse (R) and those that do not relapse (NR).
Results of the mediation analysis of selected clinical and cognitive variables in the association between EEAA DNAmTL and relapse.
| Mediator | Direct Effect1 Estimate (95% CI) | Total Effect2 Estimate (95% CI) | Indirect Effect3 Estimate (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working memory | −0.44 (−0.54, −0.24) 0.024 | −0.44 (−0.54, −0.24) 0.020 | −0.09 (−0.33, 0.26) 0.540 |
| Verbal fluency | −0.45 (−0.55, −0.18) 0.040 | −0.45 (−0.56, −0.26) 0.016 | −0.08 (−0.34, 0.21) 0.604 |
1The effect of EEAA DNAmTL on relapse with the effect of the mediator.
2The effect of EEAA DNAmTL on relapse without the mediator.
3The total effect minus the direct effect.
Characteristics of the epigenetic clocks included in the present study.
| Denotation | Reference | Phenotype | Number of CpG | Missing CpGs (%)1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horvath | Horvath et al., 2013 | Chronological age | 353 | 30 (8.5) |
| Hannum | Hannum et al., 2013 | Chronological age | 71 | 12 (16.9) |
| PhenoAge | Levine et al., 2018 | Mortality | 513 | 16 (3.1) |
| DNAmTL | Lu et al., 2019 | Telomere length | 140 | 31 (22.1) |
1Percentage of CpGs not included in the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip Kit.