| Literature DB >> 35866762 |
Li Qin1, Bo Wang2, Zaiping Wang1, Du He1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Ovarian yolk sac tumor (YST) is a very rare malignant tumor in young women. This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological prognostic characteristics and reproductive outcomes of Chinese Han patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35866762 PMCID: PMC9302259 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1.Computed tomography imaging and pathological findings of patients diagnosed with YST. (A) Computed tomography scan on admission. (B) Pathological features of YST. The red arrow indicates the tumor. The black arrow indicates typical pathological signs. YST = ovarian yolk sac tumor.
Demographic and baseline clinicopathological features of patients diagnosed with YST.
| Variables | Total (n = 50) |
|---|---|
| Age (y) | |
| Mean (±SD) | 22.7 (±7.13) |
| <23 | 23 (46.0%) |
| ≥23 | 27 (54.0%) |
| Component | |
| Mixed | 11 (22.0%) |
| Pure | 39 (78.0%) |
| Marital status | |
| Married | 29 (58.0%) |
| Unmarried | 21 (42.0%) |
| Pregnant | |
| Yes | 19 (38.0%) |
| No | 31 (62.0%) |
| Symptom | |
| Fever | 1 (2.0%) |
| Mass | 21 (42.0%) |
| Menstrual disorders | 1 (2.0%) |
| Abdominal pain | 27 (54.0%) |
| Ki67 (%) | |
| Mean (±SD) | 50.2 (±13.9) |
| >50 | 17 (34.0%) |
| ≤50 | 33 (66.0%) |
| AFP (IU/mL) | |
| <1000 | 8 (16.0%) |
| ≥1000 | 42 (84.0%) |
| CA125 (U/mL) | |
| <35 | 7 (14.0%) |
| ≥35 | 43 (86.0%) |
| CEA (ng/mL) | |
| <5 | 46 (92.0%) |
| ≥5 | 4 (8.0%) |
| CA199 (U/mL) | |
| <34 | 43 (86.0%) |
| ≥34 | 7 (14.0%) |
| Surgery | |
| Both | 1 (2.0%) |
| Laparoscope | 11 (22.0%) |
| Open | 37 (74.0%) |
| Not performed | 1 (2.0%) |
| Fertility | |
| Preserve fertility | 41 (82.0%) |
| No performed | 9 (18.0%) |
| Ascites | |
| Yes | 17 (34.0%) |
| No | 33 (66.0%) |
| Laterality | |
| Right | 26 (52.0%) |
| Left | 20 (40.0%) |
| Both | 4 (8.0%) |
| Diameter (cm) | |
| <10 | 5 (10.0%) |
| ≥10 | 45 (90.0%) |
| Chemotherapy | |
| BEP | 49 (98.0%) |
| EP | 1 (2.0%) |
| FIGO | |
| I | 24 (48.0%) |
| II–IV | 26 (52.0%) |
Reference value: CA125 < 35U/mL (normal); CA199 < 34 U/mL (normal); CEA < 5 ng/mL (normal); AFP < 7I U/mL (normal).
BEP = bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin, FIGO = Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics, EP = etoposide, cisplatin, SD = standard deviation.
Open and laparoscope.
No surgery was performed.
Maximum diameter of tumor.
Figure 2.Kaplan–Meier estimates for patients with YST after diagnoses and treatment. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve based on overall survival. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curve based on disease-free survival. YST = ovarian yolk sac tumor.
Reproductive outcome after complete remission.
| Classification | No (%) |
|---|---|
| Primary infertility at diagnosis | 2/50 (4%) |
| Attempting conception | 16/50 (32%) |
| Not attempting conception | 15/50 (30%) |
| Pregnant before diagnosis | 19/50 (38%) |
| Patients achieving pregnancy | 6/50 (12%) |
| Stage I | 5 |
| Stage II–IV | 1 |
| Total number of pregnancies | 10/50 (20%) |
| Normal pregnancy | 6 |
| Abnormal pregnancy | 4 |
| Miscarriage | 2/50 (4%) |
| Termination | 1 |
| Ectopic pregnancy | 1 |
Additional endocrine dysfunction.
Spontaneous abortion.
Tubal ampullary pregnancy.
Results of univariate and multivariate analyses of OS and DFS in patients with YST.
| DFS | OS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
| Variables | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||||
| Age (y) | 0.96 (0.87–1.06) | .39 | - | - | 0.96 (0.84–1.09) | .51 | - | - |
| Ki67 (%) | 0.92 (0.84–1.01) | .07 | 0.88 (0.79–0.97) | 0.01 | 0.85 (0.73–0.99) | .03 | - | - |
| AFP (IU/mL) | ||||||||
| <1000 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| ≥1000 | 0.42 (0.08–2.16) | .30 | - | - | - | .99 | - | - |
| CA125 (U/mL) | ||||||||
| Normal | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Abnormal | 0.93 (0.11–7.79) | .95 | - | - | 0.16 (0.02–1.10) | .06 | - | - |
| CA199 (U/mL) | ||||||||
| Normal | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Abnormal | - | .99 | - | - | - | .99 | - | - |
| Ascites | ||||||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Yes | 0.42 (0.08–2.24) | .31 | - | - | 0.51 (0.05–4.90) | .56 | - | - |
| Diameter (cm) | ||||||||
| <10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| ≥10 | 0.59 (0.07–4.96) | .63 | 0.04 (0.002–0.69) | 0.03 | 0.28 (0.03–2.71) | .27 | - | - |
| FIGO | ||||||||
| I | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| II–IV | 1.35 (0.30–6.10) | .70 | - | - | 3.69 (0.38–35.45) | .26 | - | - |
Reference value: CA125 < 35 U/mL (normal); CA199 < 34 U/mL (normal); CEA < 5 ng/mL (normal); AFP < 7 IU/mL (normal).
CI = confidence interval, DFS = disease-free survival, FIGO = Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics, HR = hazard ratio, OS = overall survival.
Based on the Akaike information criterion.
Continuous variable.