Literature DB >> 35866146

Comparative evaluation of pain perception during conventional greater palatine injections versus the use of a novel barovibrotactile device - In vivo study.

Aishwarya Avinash Gangawane1, Sonal Bhavesh Shah1, Tanvi Eknath Malankar1, Anmol Mathur2, Shriya Shrirang Ginde1, Manne Lakshmi Priyanka1.   

Abstract

Background: Pain control by means of local anesthesia is an intrinsic part of clinical practice in dentistry. It is an irony that the modality used for pain free procedure itself is a source of fear & anxiety to the patient. Several modifications have been made to the injecting devices, local anesthetic solutions and techniques to render their administration comfortably. The objective of this study was thus designed to evaluate and compare anxiety and pain perception during conventional greater palatine injections versus use of a novel barovibrotactile device named Accupal to give painless anesthesia. This device has an additional attachment which works on Vibra-pulse technology thus minimizing pain during injection technique. Materials and methods: A prospective, split mouth, open label, randomized, crossover clinical study was conducted on 50 patients coming to our institute whereby on one side Accupal was used during administration of local anesthesia. And on other side, traditional local anesthetic injection technique was used with one week of time interval.
Results: A statistically significant difference was found as in the pain perception between the two techniques as per Visual Analogue Scale whereas no difference was seen in the anxiety levels as per the physiological parameters recorded by noninvasive blood pressure machine at various intervals.
Conclusion: The use of Accupal has thus proved to show better pain control as compared to traditional injection techniques of local anesthesia.
© 2022 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Barovibrotactile device; Fear; Painless anesthesia; Palatal injections

Year:  2022        PMID: 35866146      PMCID: PMC9294554          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  13 in total

1.  Lack of pain reduction by a vibrating local anesthetic attachment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Minori Saijo; Emiko Ito; Tatsuya Ichinohe; Yuzuru Kaneko
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Advances in local anesthesia in dentistry.

Authors:  Orrett E Ogle; Ghazal Mahjoubi
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2011-07

Review 3.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory.

Authors:  R Melzack; P D Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Vibratory stimulation for the relief of pain of dental origin.

Authors:  David Ottoson; Anders Ekblom; Per Hansson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  A randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels during three types of oral anesthetic injections and the effect of Dentalvibe® on injection pain in children.

Authors:  Nabih Raslan; Reem Masri
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Effectiveness of new vibration delivery system on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia in children.

Authors:  Mangalampally Shilpapriya; Mungara Jayanthi; Venumbaka Nilaya Reddy; Rajendran Sakthivel; Girija Selvaraju; Poornima Vijayakumar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

7.  Evaluation of the injection pain with the use of DentalVibe injection system during supraperiosteal anaesthesia in children: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Ülkü Şermet Elbay; Mesut Elbay; Sİnem Yıldırım; Emİne Kaya; Can Kaya; Ceren Uğurluel; Canan Baydemİr
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections.

Authors:  E Nanitsos; R Vartuli; A Forte; P J Dennison; C C Peck
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.291

9.  Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions.

Authors:  Giath Gazal; Rashdan Alharbi; Wamiq Musheer Fareed; Esam Omar; Albraa Badr Alolayan; Hassan Al-Zoubi; Ahmad A Alnazzawi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 10.  Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update.

Authors:  Payal Saxena; Saurabh K Gupta; Vilas Newaskar; Anil Chandra
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.