Literature DB >> 35865583

A regio- and stereoselective Heck-Matsuda process for construction of γ-aryl allylsulfonyl fluorides.

Hao-Yong Qin1, Houying Gui1, Zai-Wei Zhang1, Tao Shu1, Hua-Li Qin1.   

Abstract

A highly efficient regio- and stereoselective Heck-Matsuda method was developed employing aryl diazoniums and allylsulfonyl fluorides for the construction of a class of novel γ-aryl allylsulfonyl fluorides in the presence of Pd(OAc)2 and PPh3. The method features excellent regio- and stereoselectivity (up to 100% E-selectivity), broad substrate scope and mild reaction conditions. Further application of γ-aryl allylsulfonyl fluoride in SuFEx reactions was achieved to provide their corresponding sulfonates and sulfonamides in excellent yields. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35865583      PMCID: PMC9251648          DOI: 10.1039/d2ra03733e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RSC Adv        ISSN: 2046-2069            Impact factor:   4.036


Sulfur(vi) fluoride exchange (SuFEx), firstly developed by K. B. Sharpless and co-workers in 2014,[1] has gained burgeoning attention in the fields of drug discovery,[2] protein target identification,[3] bioconjugation,[4] surface chemistry,[5] and polymer chemistry.[6] The sulfonyl fluoride moiety as a vital functionality of SuFEx chemistry is widely applied in many fields based on the unique balance between aqueous stability and chemical reactivity of the SV–F bond.[7] Aliphatic sulfonyl fluorides, as a class of representative sulfonyl fluoride molecules have been utilized as privileged “warheads” in enzyme inhibitors for decades,[8] involving MSF,[9] AM3506,[10] AM-374,[11] and PMSF[12] (Fig. 1). Allylic sulfones also have emerged as important building blocks in organic synthesis,[13] which widely present in a large variety of biologically active compounds (Fig. 1a).[14]
Fig. 1

Biologically active compounds containing allyl sulfones and sulfonyl fluorides.

Considering the increasing importance of allyl sulfone moiety and sulfonyl fluoride functionality in various fields, the simultaneous introduction of these two moieties into one molecule is highly desirable. However, due to the lack of efficient methods, access to γ-substituted allyl sulfonyl fluoride derivatives still remains less explored. Hence, it is of great significance to design and synthesize various sulfonyl fluoride compounds for the further SuFEx reactions. The Heck–Matsuda reaction has been recognized as one of the most versatile and powerful synthetic tools for the construction of C–C bond since its discovery by Matsuda.[15] Palladium-catalyzed Heck–Matsuda reaction for the synthesis of β-arylethenesulfonyl fluorides from aryl diazonium tetrafluoroborates with exclusive regio- and stereoselectivity has been well studied (Scheme 1a).[16] Inspired by this seminal work, we assumed that the Heck–Matsuda reaction would also offer a feasible approach to construct unprecedented γ-aryl allylsulfonyl fluoride molecules. However, controlling regioselectivity and stereoselectiveity of Heck–Matsuda reaction with allylsulfonyl fluoride is still challenging.[17] The low selectivity mainly results from the uncontrollable migratory insertion into the olefins (branched vs. linear olefin products) and indiscriminate β-hydride elimination with either Ha or Hb (styrenyl vs. allylic linear olefin products) (Scheme 1b).[18] Herein, we report our recent progress of palladium-catalyzed highly regio- and stereoselective Heck–Matsuda reaction for the construction of γ-aryl allylsulfonyl fluorides (3) (Scheme 1c).
Scheme 1

Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.

Our initial investigation started with the reaction of 4-methylbenzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate (1a, 0.2 mmol) and allylsulfonyl fluoride (2a, 0.4 mmol) in the presence of a catalytic amount of Pd(OAc)2 and PPh3 ligand at 25 °C in DMF (Table 1, entry 1).

Optimization of the reaction conditionsa,b

EntryLigand2a (x equiv.)SolventYield (%)
1PPh32.0DMF66
2Dppb2.0DMF36
3Dppf2.0DMFTrace
4PPh32.0DMA51
5PPh32.0MeOH71
6PPh32.0Acetone16
7cPPh32.0MeOH61
8dPPh32.0MeOH72
9 d PPh 3 1.1 MeOH 78
10dPPh31.2MeOH78
11dPPh31.5MeOH76

Reaction conditions: aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborate (1a, 0.2 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%) and PPh3 (5 mol%) were dissolved in solvent (0.2 M, 2.0 mL) before the subsequent addition of allylsulfonyl fluoride (0.4 mmol, 2.0 eq.). Then the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h.

The yields were determined by HPLC using pure 3a as the external standard (tR = 6.1 min, λmax = 258.3 nm, acetonitrile/water = 80 : 20 (v/v)).

2 mol% Pd(OAc)2, 2 mol% PPh3.

3 mol% Pd(OAc)2, 3 mol% PPh3.

Reaction conditions: aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborate (1a, 0.2 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%) and PPh3 (5 mol%) were dissolved in solvent (0.2 M, 2.0 mL) before the subsequent addition of allylsulfonyl fluoride (0.4 mmol, 2.0 eq.). Then the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The yields were determined by HPLC using pure 3a as the external standard (tR = 6.1 min, λmax = 258.3 nm, acetonitrile/water = 80 : 20 (v/v)). 2 mol% Pd(OAc)2, 2 mol% PPh3. 3 mol% Pd(OAc)2, 3 mol% PPh3. To our delight, the 1H NMR of crude product indicated that the (E)-styrenyl product 3a was formed exclusively, while the possible isomeric products were not observed. Subsequently, a variety of ligands such as triphenylphosphine, 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino) butane (dppb), 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf) were screened, and triphenylphosphine was found to be the optimal ligand for this process (Table 1, entry 1–3). The screening of the solvent indicated that methanol was the best choice (Table 1, entry 4–6). Subsequent examination on the loading of catalyst and ligand revealed that 3 mol% Pd(OAc)2 and 3 mol% PPh3 were essential (Table 1, entry 7–8). Reducing the amount of allylsulfonyl fluoride from 2.0 equivalents to 1.1 equivalents led to nearly identical yields of desired product 3a (Table 1, entry 9–11). Therefore, Pd(OAc)2 (3 mol%), PPh3 (3 mol%), allylsulfonyl fluoride (1.1 equiv.) in MeOH (0.1 M) was eventually selected as the optimized conditions for the process. With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we next evaluated the substrate scope and functional group tolerance of this protocol using various aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborates (1) and allylsulfonyl fluorides (2). It turned out to be that our protocol was compatible with a broad range of substrates, delivering the desired products with excellent selectivity in most cases. Besides, the substrates bearing whether electron-donating groups (1a, 1c, 1k, 1n, 1o, and 1r) or electron-withdrawing groups (1d–1j, 1l, 1m, 1q, and 1v) all worked well. In addition, ortho-, meta-, or para-mono-substituted and multi-substituted diazonium (1r–1v) salts all afforded their corresponding products in moderate to good yields. It is worth noting that the halogen atom on the aromatic rings of aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborates (1d–1f, 1l, 1m, 1p, and 1v) tolerated well and delivered their corresponding products in acceptable yields, while the C (sp2)–X bond remained untouched during the transformations. Nitro-substituted (1g) diazonium salt was also successfully converted into the corresponding allyl sulfonyl fluoride with moderate yield (3g, 56% yield) (Table 2). Furthermore, the allylsulfonyl fluoride with a methyl substituent on the vinyl skeleton (2b) was also compatible with the reaction system, albeit a moderate yield of the product (3w) was achieved. And the E configuration of compound 3w was confirmed by NOE analysis (see the ESI† for details).

Substrate scope of aryldiazonium tetrafluoroboratesa,b

Reaction conditions: aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborate (1, 1.0 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (3 mol%) and PPh3 (3 mol%) were dissolved in MeOH (0.1 M), before the subsequent addition of allylsulfonyl fluoride (1.1 mmol, 1.1 eq.). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature under air. The selectivity for (E)-styrene was >20 : 1 unless otherwise noted. The selectivity is (E)-styrene: (all other isomers), as determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

Isolated yields.

The selectivity for (E)-styrene was >10 : 1.

The selectivity for (E)-styrene was = 9 : 1.

Reaction conditions: aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborate (1, 1.0 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (3 mol%) and PPh3 (3 mol%) were dissolved in MeOH (0.1 M), before the subsequent addition of allylsulfonyl fluoride (1.1 mmol, 1.1 eq.). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature under air. The selectivity for (E)-styrene was >20 : 1 unless otherwise noted. The selectivity is (E)-styrene: (all other isomers), as determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Isolated yields. The selectivity for (E)-styrene was >10 : 1. The selectivity for (E)-styrene was = 9 : 1. To demonstrate the practicality of this method, a series of gram-scale reactions were performed under the optimal reaction conditions (Scheme 2). And the research results revealed that these reactions worked well to transform the corresponding aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborates (1b, 1d, 1k, 1q, and 1t) into their corresponding products (3b, 3d, 3k, 3q, and 3t) in moderate to excellent yields (50–96%).
Scheme 2

Gram-scale experiments.

Some extended work focusing on the chemical transformations of this class of novel sulfonyl fluoride molecules was carried out as described in the Scheme 3. (E)-3-Phenylprop-2-ene-1-sulfonyl fluoride (3b) was successfully converted into sulfonamide (4) in nearly quantitative yield (99%) when coupled with morpholine in the presence of Et3N. Furthermore, the SuFEx reactions of (E)-3-phenylprop-2-ene-1-sulfonyl fluoride (3b) with phenol or alcohols also proceeded smoothly, delivering the sulfonates (5, 6a, and 6b) in good to excellent yields (67–97%).
Scheme 3

Transformations via SuFEx reactions.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have successfully developed a mild, efficient, and robust Heck–Matsuda reaction for highly regio- and stereoselective construction of γ-aryl allylsulfonyl fluorides. The application of these novel molecules in SuFEx chemistry was also demonstrated. Further studies on the biological activity of these novel sulfonyl fluorides and chemical transformations of allylsulfonyl fluorides reagent are undergoing in our laboratory.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.
  36 in total

Review 1.  Sulfones: new reagents in organocatalysis.

Authors:  Andrea-Nekane R Alba; Xavier Companyó; Ramon Rios
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Directed Copper-Catalyzed Intermolecular Heck-Type Reaction of Unactivated Olefins and Alkyl Halides.

Authors:  Chunlin Tang; Ran Zhang; Bo Zhu; Junkai Fu; Yi Deng; Li Tian; Wei Guan; Xihe Bi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Bifluoride-catalysed sulfur(VI) fluoride exchange reaction for the synthesis of polysulfates and polysulfonates.

Authors:  Bing Gao; Linda Zhang; Qinheng Zheng; Feng Zhou; Liana M Klivansky; Jianmei Lu; Yi Liu; Jiajia Dong; Peng Wu; K Barry Sharpless
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 24.427

4.  Iterative Arylation of Itaconimides with Diazonium Salts through Electrophilic Palladium Catalysis: Divergent β-H-Elimination Pathways in Repetitive Matsuda-Heck Reactions.

Authors:  Nastja Riemer; Michael Shipman; Pablo Wessig; Bernd Schmidt
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  Protecting-Group-Free Iterative Exponential Growth Method for Synthesizing Sequence-Defined Polymers.

Authors:  Zi Li; Xiangzhu Ren; Peng Sun; Hao Ding; Shumu Li; Yilin Zhao; Ke Zhang
Journal:  ACS Macro Lett       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.903

6.  Methanesulfonyl fluoride, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, attenuates simple learning and memory deficits in ischemic rats.

Authors:  Cesario V Borlongan; Isabel C Sumaya; Donald E Moss
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Selective inhibition of the immunoproteasome by ligand-induced crosslinking of the active site.

Authors:  Christian Dubiella; Haissi Cui; Malte Gersch; Arwin J Brouwer; Stephan A Sieber; Achim Krüger; Rob M J Liskamp; Michael Groll
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Protein Glycosylation through Sulfur Fluoride Exchange (SuFEx) Chemistry: The Key Role of a Fluorosulfate Thiolactoside.

Authors:  Alberto Marra; Jiajia Dong; Tiancheng Ma; Stefano Giuntini; Elisa Crescenzo; Linda Cerofolini; Marco Martinucci; Claudio Luchinat; Marco Fragai; Cristina Nativi; Alessandro Dondoni
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  Sulfonyl fluoride inhibitors of fatty acid amide hydrolase.

Authors:  Shakiru O Alapafuja; Spyros P Nikas; Indu T Bharathan; Vidyanand G Shukla; Mahmoud L Nasr; Anna L Bowman; Nikolai Zvonok; Jing Li; Xiaomeng Shi; John R Engen; Alexandros Makriyannis
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  A randomized phase I study of methanesulfonyl fluoride, an irreversible cholinesterase inhibitor, for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Donald E Moss; Ruggero G Fariello; Jörg Sahlmann; Isabel Sumaya; Federica Pericle; Enrico Braglia
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.