| Literature DB >> 35865383 |
Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari1,2, Kaveh Samimi3, Hamid Zomorodian4, Hooman Bakhshandeh1, Maryam Jafari5, Ali Mohammad Farahmand6, Taleb Pourseyedian1, Maedeh Sharifian1, Salah Dine Qanadli7.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between whole lung enhancement (WLE) and pulmonary blood volume (PBV) obtained through dual energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography (DECTPA) and echocardiography-derived systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP).Entities:
Keywords: dual energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography; pulmonary artery pressure; pulmonary blood volume; pulmonary hypertension; whole lung enhancement
Year: 2022 PMID: 35865383 PMCID: PMC9294319 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.835655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Study flow chart demonstrating the study population and method, as well as study results in groups of SPAP <30 and SPAP >30.
Figure 2Image reconstruction was performed as three sets of images: 140-kV images, 100-kV images, and weighted-average images (with 60% and 40% weighting from Sn 100 kVp and Sn 140 kVp image series, respectively). The dual energy algorithm measures the attenuation in each voxel and uses the known standard attenuation ranges for the three major components of the lung parenchyma including the air, soft tissue and iodine, to calculate the relative contribution of each component to the voxel attenuation. The iodine distribution maps are subsequently created by the software.
Figure 3Dual energy CT pulmonary angiography in a CTEPH patient is demonstrated as iodine map overlay (a) and total blood volume image (b).
Baseline and cardiologic characteristics in total study group and subgroups according to the presence and type of PTE.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53 (35–62) | 50 (34–61) | 58 (39–67) | 49 (33–60) | |
| EF (%) | 50 (40–50) | 45 (35–55) | 50 (40–50) | 50 (45–50) | |
| SPAP (mmHg) | 40 (30–61) | 39.5 (28–50) | 35 (27–55) | 61 (42–100) | |
| WLE (HU) | 31 (24–36) | 32 (27–40) | 27 (23–31) | 26 (21–31) | |
| PBV (%) | 72 (53–95) | 76.5 (54–98) | 55 (39–110) | 64 (50–85) | |
| MPA diameter (mm) | 29.8 (26.4–34.3) | 28 (25–32) | 30 (26–33) | 34 (30–35) | |
| MPA/AA | 0.89 (0.76–1.04) | 0.87 (0.75–0.97) | 0.87 (0.75–1.03) | 1.06 (0.92–1.25) | |
| RV/LV | 1.08 (0.91–1.24) | 1.02 (0.84–1.15) | 1.08 (0.88–1.24) | 1.26 (1.06–1.32) | |
| Sex | Female | 30 (48%) | 18 (47%) | 6 (54%) | 6 (46%) |
| Male | 32 (52%) | 20 (53%) | 5 (44%) | 7 (54%) | |
| reflux to IVC | No | 33 (54%) | 21 (56%) | 5 (45%) | 7 (54%) |
| Yes | 28 (46%) | 37 (44%) | 6 (55%) | 6 (46%) | |
| reflux to coronary sinus | No | 26 (43%) | 14 (38%) | 4 (36%) | 8 (62%) |
| Yes | 35 (57%) | 23 (62%) | 7 (64%) | 5 (38%) | |
| Leftward septal bowing | No | 24 (40%) | 16 (43%) | 3 (27%) | 5 (38%) |
| Yes | 37 (60%) | 21 (57%) | 8 (73%) | 8 (62%) |
Values are median (Interquartile range) or n (%).
Comparison of baseline and CT parameters according to SPAP of more or <30 mm Hg.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53 (35–62) | 58 (48–60) | 49 (33–62) | 0.35 | |
| EF (%) | 50 (40–50) | 50 (45–55) | 45 (35–50) | 0.07 | |
| WLE (HU) | 31 (24–36) | 35 (28–42) | 29 (24–33) |
| |
| PBV (%) | 72 (53–95) | 88 (72–104) | 66 (49–88) |
| |
| MPA diameter (mm) | 29.8 (26.4–34.3) | 28 (26–30) | 31 (26–34) | 0.09 | |
| MPA/AA | 0.89 (0.76–1.04) | 0.87 (0.81–0.98) | 0.9 (0.75–1.05) | 0.70 | |
| RV/LV | 1.08 (0.91–1.24) | 0.95 (0.83–1.14) | 1.12 (0.92–1.28) | 0.08 | |
| PTE type | No | 38 (61%) | 10 (67%) | 28 (60%) | 0.76 |
| Acute | 11 (18%) | 3 (20%) | 8 (17%) | ||
| Chronic | 13 (21%) | 2 (13%) | 11 (23%) | ||
| Sex | Male | 32 (52%) | 8 (53%) | 25 (52%) | 0.93 |
| Female | 30 (48%) | 7 (47%) | 23 (48%) | ||
| Reflux to IVC | No | 33 (54%) | 11 (73%) | 22 (48%) | 0.13 |
| Yes | 28 (46%) | 4 (27%) | 24 (52%) | ||
| Leftward septal bowing | No | 24 (39%) | 8 (53%) | 16 (35%) | 0.23 |
| Yes | 37 (61%) | 7 (47%) | 30 (65%) | ||
| Reflux to Coronary sinus | No | 26 (43%) | 10 (67%) | 16 (35%) |
|
| Yes | 35 (57%) | 5 (33%) | 30 (65%) |
The significant P-values of less than 0.05 are shown in bold font.
Comparison of baseline and CT parameters according to SPAP of more or <40 mm Hg.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53 (35–62) | 56 (37–62) | 47 (32–61) | 0.37 | |
| EF (%) | 50 (40–50) | 50 (45–55) | 45 (35–50) |
| |
| WLE (HU) | 31 (24–36) | 31 (26–42) | 28 (23–33) |
| |
| PBV (%) | 72 (53–95) | 85 (64–98) | 64 (48–89) | 0.059 | |
| MPA diameter (mm) | 29.8 (26.4–34.3) | 27 (23–30) | 32.7 (29.4–35) |
| |
| MPA/AA | 0.89 (0.76–1.04) | 0.86 (0.75–0.97) | 0.93 (0.8–1.11) | 0.12 | |
| RV/LV | 1.08 (0.91–1.24) | 1.03 (0.84–1.18) | 1.14 (0.96–1.29) | 0.10 | |
| PTE type | No | 38 (61%) | 19 (68%) | 19 (56%) | 0.21 |
| Acute | 11 (18%) | 6 (21%) | 5 (15%) | ||
| Chronic | 13 (21%) | 3 (11%) | 10 (30%) | ||
| Sex | Male | 32 (52%) | 15 (54%) | 18 (53%) | 0.89 |
| Female | 30 (48%) | 13 (46%) | 16 (47%) | ||
| Reflux to IVC | No | 33 (54%) | 18 (64%) | 15 (45%) | 0.19 |
| Yes | 28 (46%) | 10 (36%) | 18 (55%) | ||
| Leftward septal bowing | No | 24 (39%) | 13 (46%) | 11 (33%) | 0.43 |
| Yes | 37 (61%) | 15 (54%) | 22 (67%) | ||
| Reflux to coronary sinus | No | 26 (43%) | 14 (50%) | 12 (36%) | 0.31 |
| Yes | 35 (57%) | 14 (50%) | 21 (64%) |
The significant P-values of less than 0.05 are shown in bold font.