| Literature DB >> 35865376 |
Uwe Primessnig1,2,3, Peter M Deißler1,2, Paulina Wakula1,2, Khai Liem Tran1,2, Felix Hohendanner1,2,3, Dirk von Lewinski4, Florian Blaschke1,2, Christoph Knosalla2,5, Volkmar Falk2,5,6, Burkert Pieske1,2,3,7, Herko Grubitzsch2,6, Frank R Heinzel1,2.
Abstract
Background: Although the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan started a new era in heart failure (HF) treatment, less is known about the tissue-level effects of the drug on the atrial myocardial functional reserve and arrhythmogenesis. Methods andEntities:
Keywords: BNP; arrhythmias; atrial function; heart failure; neprilysin; sacubitril/valsartan; sacubitrilat/valsartan (Sac/Val)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35865376 PMCID: PMC9294287 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.859014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Effect of BNP on atrial inotropy and lusitropy after adrenergic stimulation. Example traces of time-dependent analysis of BNP (n = 20 strips) are shown in (A), with the corresponding data on the effect of BNP treatment on atrial systolic force (B), and end-diastolic tension generation (C) after 70 min. The slope of end-diastolic tension over time is shown in (D). The effects of a frequency-variation protocol [example traces in (E), n = 40 strips] on systolic force at different stimulation frequencies are shown in (F,G). Correlation of patient plasma NTproBNP and relative force increase after ISO treatment (values from n = 19 patients with available NTproBNP) is shown in (H). Data are shown as mean ± SEM; each data point represents one muscle strip. In (H), each point represents the mean developed systolic force per patient. ISO, isoproterenol; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide.
Figure 2Effect of Sac/Val on atrial inotropy and lusitropy after adrenergic stimulation. Example traces of a “frequency-variation protocol” in Sac-treated muscle strips (n = 15 strips) are shown in (A), with its effects on developed force during different frequencies shown in (B,C). Examples traces of a frequency-variation protocol in Sac/Val treated muscle strips (n = 24 strips) are shown in (D), with the corresponding effects on developed force in (E,F). The effects of Sac/Val on end-diastolic tension are shown as per stimulation frequency (G) and as the diastolic tension slope derived from linear regression (H). Data are shown as mean ± SEM; each data point represents one muscle strip. ISO, isoproterenol, Sac: Sacubitrilat; Val: valsartan; Veh: vehicle (DMSO).
Figure 3Effect of BNP and Sac/Val on atrial arrhythmogenesis. (A) Representative traces of a protocol with constant stimulation at 1 Hz in strips treated with ISO ± BNP; the overall effect of BNP treatment on arrhythmogenesis in this protocol is shown in (B). For this analysis, three time intervals (25–30, 45–50, and 65–70 min) after ISO have been screened for arrhythmias. (C) Example traces for muscle strips treated with ISO ± BNP during the switch from 3 Hz to 0.5 Hz stimulation frequency in a “frequency-variation protocol” protocol. The effects of BNP on arrhythmogenesis at 0.5 Hz (D) and pooled over all time points (E) are shown. For this analysis, the arrhythmias at 1 Hz (10 min) and 2, 3, and 0.5 Hz (each 5 min) have been included Finally, example traces of muscle strips treated with a vehicle (DMSO) or Sac/Val at the transition between 1 and 2 Hz stimulation frequency are shown in (F), with the effects of Sac/Val treatment on arrhythmias at higher stimulation frequencies in (G) and the overall effect on arrhythmia in (H). For this analysis, the arrhythmias at 1 Hz (10 min) and 2, 3, and 0.5 Hz (each 5 min) have been included. ISO, isoproterenol; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; Veh, vehicle (DSMO); Sac, sacubitrilat; Val, valsartan.
Figure 4NEP expression (in ng/mg of total protein) in human atrial and ventricular samples from patients with end-stage heart failure. NEP expression was analyzed in RA and LV biopsies from n = 10 patients with end-stage heart failure. NEP is equally expressed in the failing atrial and ventricular myocardium (A) and expression of atrial and ventricular NEP correlates in the patient cohort (B). LV NEP expression correlates inversely with LA volume (C) and RA NEP negatively correlates with patient NYHA (D). Each point represents data from one patient. NEP, Neprilysin; LV, left ventricle; LA, left atrium; RA, right atrium.
Patient characteristics.
|
| ||||||
|
|
| |||||
| Age | 71 (66–77) | ACE Inhibitors/ AT1–RB | 76 % 32/42 | |||
| Sex (male) | 86 % 36/42 | Beta–Blocker | 64 % 27/42 | |||
| BMI | 27 (24–30) | Diuretics | 36 % 15/42 | |||
| Arterial hypertension | 76 % 32/42 | MRI | 14 % 6/42 | |||
| Dyslipidemia | 45% 19/42 | ARNI | 2 % 1/42 | |||
| Adipositas | 26 % 11/42 | Statine | 64 % 27/42 | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | 33 % 14/42 | Oral antidiabetic | 26 % 11/42 | |||
| Coronary artery disease | 88 % 37/42 | Insulin | 5 % 2/42 | |||
| Atrial Fibrillation | 26 % 11/42 | |||||
| COPD | 14 % 6/42 |
| ||||
| Heart failure | 29 % 12/42 | Coronary Artery Bypass Graft | 83 % 35/42 | |||
| Chronic kidney disease | 17 % 7/42 | Aortic Valve Replacement or reconstruction | 24 % 10/42 | |||
| Smoker | 33 % 14/42 | Mitral Valve Replacement or reconstruction | 5 % 2/42 | |||
| Alcoholism | 7 % 3/42 | Aortic–Root–Replacement | 12 % 5/42 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Hb (g/dl) | 14 (13–15) | N = 42 | ||||
| Na+ (mmol/l) | 140 (138–143) | N = 42 | ||||
| K+ (mmol/l) | 4.2 (4.0–4.5) | N = 42 | ||||
| NT–proBNP (ng/l) | 769 (396–1984) | N = 23 | ||||
| GFR (ml/min) | 76 (61–90) | N = 42 | ||||
| Creatinin (mg/dl) | 0.95 (0.79–1.17) | N = 42 | ||||
| CRP (mg/l) | 2.75 (0.9–11.23) | N = 42 | ||||
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 41 (38–46) | N = 19 | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| LVEF (%) | 53 (45–57) | N = 42 | ||||
| LVEDD (mm) | 46 (44–52) | N = 41 | ||||
| IVSd (mm) | 13 (12–14) | N = 41 | ||||
| PWd (mm) | 12 (11–12) | N = 41 | ||||
| LA volume biplan (ml) | 61 (51–81) | N = 36 | ||||
| LAVI (ml/m2) | 31 (27–38) | N = 35 | ||||
| LA diameter (mm) | 38 (35–40) | N = 39 | ||||
| LA emptying fraction (norm >37%) | 50 (35–55) | N = 35 | ||||
| LA strain (>23% norm) | 19 (14–29) | N = 20 | ||||
| RA area (cm2) | 16 (14–20) | N = 36 | ||||
| RA diameter (mm) | 35 (28–38) | N = 38 | ||||
| RA emptying fraction (norm >37%) | 52 (33–59) | N = 32 | ||||
| RA strain reservoir+conduit (ϵe) | 42 (31–49) | N = 14 | ||||
| E/É | 11 (10–13) | N = 17 | ||||
| TAPSE (mm) | 19 (17–23) | N = 39 | ||||
| RVEDD (mm) | 35 (31–39) | N = 37 | ||||
| sPAP (mmHg) | 25 (24–31) | N = 21 |
Clinical characteristics of patient cohort included for in vitro experiments .