| Literature DB >> 35865346 |
Hefei Wang1, Xiaoxia An1, Zhengli Wang1.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical effect and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) combined with 1550 nm fractional laser therapy in the treatment of rosacea.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35865346 PMCID: PMC9296273 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3335074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Skin lesion score evaluation.
| Score (points) | Erythema | Telangiectasias | Papule | Impetigo | Itch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | No | No | No | No | No |
|
| |||||
| 1 | Mild symptoms, mainly distributed in the middle of the face, or a few on the full face | Small blood vessels less than 0.2 mm in diameter, with an area less than 10% of the face | Small | Small | Mild |
|
| |||||
| 2 | Obvious symptoms, mainly distributed in the middle of the face, or the entire face | More small blood vessels and (or) a few large blood vessels with a diameter greater than 0.2 mm, occupying 10%–30% of the face | Medium | Medium | Tolerable |
|
| |||||
| 3 | Severe symptoms, widely distributed throughout the face | A large number of small blood vessels and (or) large blood vessels with an area larger than 30% of the face | Severe | Severe | Unbearable |
Comparison of baseline data.
| Group | ALA-PDT group ( | Laser group ( | Combination group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 12 | 14 | 10 | ||
| Female | 26 | 24 | 28 | 0.974 | 0.614 |
| Age (years) | 34.80 ± 10.20 | 37.06 ± 10.55 | 36.42 ± 11.05 | 0.458 | 0.634 |
| Course (years) | 2.40 ± 0.62 | 2.75 ± 0.70 | 2.56 ± 0.73 | 2.487 | 0.088 |
Comparison of skin lesion scores before and after treatment.
| Time | ALA-PDT group ( | Laser group ( | Combination group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 9.46 ± 2.40 | 10.10 ± 2.32 | 9.88 ± 2.60 | 0.673 | 0.521 |
| After treatment | 4.05 ± 1.02 | 3.88 ± 1.10 | 2.30 ± 0.60 | 40.677 | <0.001 |
|
| 12.79 | 14.93 | 17.51 | ||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Note. Comparison with the ALA-PDT group, P < 0.05 comparison with the laser group, #P < 0.05.
Comparison of efficacy.
| Index | ALA-PDT group ( | Laser group ( | Combination group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6.532 | 0.038 |
| Significant effectiveness | 20 | 18 | 15 | ||
| Improvement | 6 | 6 | 2 | ||
| Ineffectiveness | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Effective rate (%) | 30 (78.95) | 31 (88.57) | 35 (92.11) | 2.771 | 0.25 |
Figure 1Comparison of rosacea before and after treatment. (a) Before treatment in the combination group; (b) after the first treatment in the combination group; (c) after treatment in the combination group.
Comparison of adverse reactions.
| Index | ALA-PDT group ( | Laser group ( | Combination group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edema with lupus erythematosus | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1.535 | 0.464 |
| Pain | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0.174 | 0.917 |
| Burning sensation | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0.145 | 0.93 |
| Pigmentation | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Hypopigmentation | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Scar | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |