| Literature DB >> 35865200 |
Romain Mustière1, Prisca Lagardère2, Sébastien Hutter3, Céline Deraeve4, Florian Schwalen4, Dyhia Amrane1, Nicolas Masurier2, Nadine Azas3, Vincent Lisowski2, Pierre Verhaeghe4,5, Dominique Mazier6, Patrice Vanelle1,7, Nicolas Primas1,7.
Abstract
In 2015, we identified gamhepathiopine (M1), a 2-tert-butylaminothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-4(3H)-one antiplasmodial hit targeting all development stages of the human malarial parasite P. falciparum. However, this hit compound suffers from sensitivity to hepatic oxidative metabolism. Herein, we describe the synthesis of 33 new compounds in the 2-aminothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-4(3H)-one series modulated at position 6 of this scaffold. The modulations were performed using three palladium-catalyzed cross coupling reactions, namely Suzuki-Miyaura, Sonogashira, and Buchwald-Hartwig. For the latter, we developed the reaction conditions. Then, we evaluated the synthesized compounds for their antiplasmodial activity on the K1 P. falciparum strain and their cytotoxicity on the human HepG2 cell line. Although we did not obtain a compound better than M1 in terms of the antiplasmodial activity, we identified compound 1g bearing a piperidine at position 6 of the thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-4(3H)-one ring with an improved cytotoxicity and metabolic stability. 1g is an interesting new starting point for further pharmacomodulation studies. This study also provides valuable antiplasmodial SAR data regarding the nature of the ring at position 6, the possible substituent on this ring, and the introduction of a spacer between this ring and the thienopyrimidinone moiety. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35865200 PMCID: PMC9264115 DOI: 10.1039/d2ra01687g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Chemical structures of antimalarial compounds in clinical trial or recently withdrawn from them.
Scheme 1Chemical structure of compound M1 and general structures for the compounds presented in this work.
Optimization of the Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling reaction between 1 and p-toluidine
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Eq. | mol% Pd | Phosphine | Mol% Phos | Base | Eq. Base | Solvent | Estimated yield |
| 1 | 1.2 | 2 | Rac-BINAP | 4 | Cs2CO3 | 3 | Dioxane | 0 |
| 2 | 1.2 | 10 | Rac-BINAP | 10 | Cs2CO3 | 1.4 | Toluene | 0 |
| 3 | 1.2 | 10 | Rac-BINAP | 10 | NaO | 1.4 | Toluene | 0 |
| 4 | 1.2 | 2 | RuPhos | 8 | NaO | 1.4 | Toluene | 0 |
| 5 | 1.2 | 5 | RuPhos | 10 | NaO | 3 | Toluene | 0 |
| 6 | 1.2 | 5 | SPhos | 10 | NaO | 3 | Toluene | Traces |
| 7 | 1.2 | 5 | RuPhos | 10 | NaO | 3 | Dioxane | 4 |
| 8 | 1.2 | 5 | SPhos | 10 | NaO | 3 | Dioxane | 46 |
| 9 | 1.2 | 5 | XPhos | 10 | NaO | 3 | Dioxane | 47 |
| 10 | 1.2 | 5 |
| 10 | NaO | 3 | Dioxane | 0 |
| 11 | 1.2 | 5 | SPhos | 10 | LiHMDS | 3 | Dioxane | 0 |
| 12 | 1.2 | 5 | SPhos | 10 | NaO | 3 | DME | Traces |
| 13 | 5 | 5 | SPhos | 10 | NaO | 3 | Dioxane | 66 |
| 14 | 5 | 5 | XPhos | 10 | NaO | 3 | Dioxane | 100 (1 h) |
| 15 | 3 | 5 | XPhos | 10 | NaO | 3 | Dioxane | 100 (2 h) |
| 16 | 5 | 4 | XPhos | 8 | NaO | 3 | Dioxane | 100 (2 h) |
Using LCMS.
Pd(dba)2.
Dehalogenation of the starting material mainly observed.
Scope of the Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling reaction on compound 1
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Compound | R | Isolated yield |
| 1a | 4-Me–Ph–NH– | 55 |
| 1b | 3-Me–Ph–NH– | 31 |
| 1c | 2-Me–Ph–NH– | 15 (53) |
| 1d | 4-MeO–Ph–NH– | 14 (63) |
| 1e | 4 F–Ph–NH– | 23 (65) |
| 1f | Morpholinyl– | 35 (74) |
| 1g | Piperidinyl– | 15 (51) |
| 1h |
| Complete dehalogenation of 1 |
| 1i | Pyrazole | No reaction |
| 1j | Imidazole | No reaction |
| 1k | Pyrimidinyl-3–amine | Traces of 1k and dehalogenated byproduct |
| 1l | Cyclopropylamine | Complete dehalogenation of 1 |
| 1m | Ethanolamine | Complete dehalogenation of 1 |
Conversion rate (determined by LCMS) indicated between brackets if the conversion was not complete.
Optimization attempts for Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling reaction on compound 2
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Base | Phosphine | Putative outcome |
| 1 |
| XPhos | Cyclopropylamine introduced at position 5 – saponification of the methyl ester |
| 2 | Cs2CO3 | XPhos | Homocoupling of 2 |
| 3 | LiHMDS | XPhos | Conversion of the methyl ester into cyclopropylamide |
| 4 | Cs2CO3 | BrettPhos | Homocoupling of 2 |
from LCMS observations.
Scheme 2Sonogashira reaction on compound 2.
Synthesis of 6-alkynyl-2-aminothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin4(3H)-ones 2b–2h
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | R1 | R2 | Yield (%) |
| 2b |
| 4-Me–Ph– | 60 |
| 2c |
| 4-Me–Ph– | 23 |
| 2d |
| HO(CH2)2– | 47 |
| 2e |
| Cyclopropyl– | 23 |
| 2f |
| H– | 57 |
| 2g |
|
| 35 |
| 2h |
| Ph– | 85 |
Two steps.
Synthesis of 5-functionalized thiophene aminoesters 3a–3l
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Compound | R | Isolated yield (%) |
| 3a | 4-CO2Me–Ph– | 55 |
| 3b | 4-NO2–Ph– | 65 |
| 3c | 4-HO–Ph– | 64 |
| 3d | 3-Cl-4-F–Ph– | 82 |
| 3e | 4-Morpholinyl–Ph– | 73 |
| 3f | 4-( | 71 |
| 3g | 4-Piperidinyl–Ph– | 71 |
| 3h | 4-MeS–Ph– | 72 |
| 3i | 4-MeSO2–Ph– | 62 |
| 3j | 4-(H2N–SO2)–Ph– | 47 |
| 3k | 4-(Morpholinyl–SO2)–Ph– | 88 |
| 3l | 2-Chloropyrimidin-5-yl– | 44 |
Scheme 3SNAr reaction on compound 3l.
Cyclization reaction leading to compounds 4a–4o
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | R | R′ | Isolated yield (%) |
| 4a | 4-CO2Me–Ph– |
| 55 |
| 4b | 4-NO2–Ph– |
| 55 |
| 4c | iPr | 33 | |
| 4d | 4-HO–Ph– |
| 13 |
| 4e | 3-Cl-4-F–Ph– |
| 49 |
| 4f | iPr | 37 | |
| 4g | 4-Morpholinyl–Ph– |
| 69 |
| 4h | 4-( |
| 23 |
| 4i | 4-Piperidinyl–Ph– |
| 51 |
| 4j | 4-MeS–Ph– |
| 65 |
| 4k | 4-MeSO2–Ph– |
| 44 |
| 4l | 4-(H2N–SO2)-Ph- |
| 56 |
| 4m | 4-(Morpholinyl–SO2)–Ph– |
| 33 |
| 4n | 2-Morpholinopyrimidin-5-yl– |
| 57 |
| 4o | 2-( |
| 19 |
Scheme 4Synthesis of compounds 4p–4s.
Antiplasmodial activity and cytotoxicity of the synthesized 2-aminothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin4(3H)-ones
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | R1 | R2 | EC50 | CC50 HepG2 (μM) | SI |
|
| 1 | Br |
| 43.2 ± 2.6 | 38.2 ± 3.5 | 0.9 | 3.19 |
| 3 | iPr | >50 | 89.1 ± 9.7 | <1.8 | 2.91 | |
| 1a | 4-Me–Ph–NH– |
| 10.3 ± 0.2 | 21.7 ± 2.1 | 2.1 | 4.38 |
| 1b | 3-Me–Ph–NH– |
| 1.1 ± 0.3 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 4.8 | 4.38 |
| 1c | 2-Me–Ph–NH– |
| 4.3 ± 0.2 | 14.1 ± 0.3 | 3.3 | 4.38 |
| 1d | 4-MeO–Ph–NH– |
| 7.2 ± 2.0 | 24.0 ± 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.71 |
| 1e | 4 F–Ph–NH– |
| 7.1 ± 1.4 | 21.3 ± 1.6 | 3.0 | 4.01 |
| 1f | Morpholinyl– |
| 4.5 ± 1.1 | >50 | >11.1 | 2.31 |
| 1g |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2b | 4-Me–Ph– |
| 2.35 ± 0.38 | >12.5 | >5.3 | 5.03 |
| 2c | iPr | 4.6 ± 1.0 | 3.1 ± 0.6 | 0.7 | 4.75 | |
| 2d | HO(CH2)2– |
| >10 | >50 | — | 2.39 |
| 2e | Cyclopropyl– |
| 1.9 ± 0.6 | 20.8 ± 1.4 | 10.9 | 3.65 |
| 2f | H– |
| >12.5 | 4.7 ± 1.0 | <0.4 | 2.54 |
| 2g |
|
| >5 | 41.6 ± 5.2 | <8.3 | 2.20 |
| 2h | Ph– | iPr | 2.8 ± 1.0 | >12.5 | >4.5 | 4.23 |
| 4a | 4-CO2Me–Ph– |
| 2.5 ± 0.9 | >12.5 | >5.0 | 3.91 |
| 4d | 4-HO–Ph– |
| 7.5 ± 1.0 | 12.2 ± 0.3 | 1.6 | 3.60 |
| 4e | 3-Cl-4-F–Ph– |
| 2.0 ± 0.9 | >12.5 | >6.3 | 4.65 |
| 4f | iPr | 3.6 ± 1.2 | >6.25 | >1.7 | 4.37 | |
| 4g | 4-Morpholinyl–Ph– |
| 2.4 ± 0.9 | 7.9 ± 1.3 | 3.3 | 3.79 |
| 4h | 4-( |
| 4.1 ± 0.7 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 1.4 | 3.29 |
| 4i | 4-Piperidinyl–Ph- |
| 4.1 ± 1.2 | >6.25 | >1.5 | 4.86 |
| 4j | 4-MeS–Ph– |
| 1.0 ± 0.3 | >12.5 | >12.5 | 4.53 |
| 4k | 4-MeSO2–Ph– |
| 3.0 ± 0.6 | >25 | >8.3 | 2.74 |
| 4l | 4-(H2N–SO2)–Ph– |
| >12.5 | >6.25 | — | 2.51 |
| 4m | 4-(Morpholinyl–SO2)–Ph– |
| 5.1 ± 2.6 | >12.5 | >2.5 | 2.74 |
| 4n | 2-Morpholinopyrimidin-5-yl– |
| 2.1 ± 0.6 | 26.4 ± 4.6 | 12.6 | 2.55 |
| 4o | 2-( |
| 4.4 ± 1.0 | 11.2 ± 1.3 | 2.5 | 2.40 |
| 4p | 4-NH2-Ph– |
| 3.5 ± 1.2 | 2.5 ± 1.0 | 0.7 | 3.07 |
| 4q | iPr | 6.0 ± 1.1 | 11.3 ± 3.5 | 1.9 | 2.79 | |
| 4r | 4-(CH3–CO–NH)-Ph– |
| 3.9 ± 1.1 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | <0.1 | 3.14 |
| 4s | 4-(CH3–SONH)-Ph– |
| >12.5 | 63.3 ± 14.6 | <5.1 | 2.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| — | 0.2 | — |
| ||
Values from ref. 9.
See experimental part for details.
Fig. 2RSA data obtained from the biological results.