Literature DB >> 35865091

Generation of αGal-enhanced bifunctional tumor vaccine.

Jian He1, Yu Huo1, Zhikun Zhang1, Yiqun Luo1, Xiuli Liu1, Qiaoying Chen1, Pan Wu1, Wei Shi2, Tao Wu3, Chao Tang1, Huixue Wang1, Lan Li1, Xiyu Liu1, Yong Huang1, Yongxiang Zhao1, Lu Gan1, Bing Wang4, Liping Zhong1.   

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant tumor with poor prognosis and high mortality. In this study, we demonstrated a novel vaccine targeting HCC and tumor neovascular endothelial cells by fusing recombinant MHCC97H cells expressing porcine α-1,3-galactose epitopes (αGal) and endorphin extracellular domains (END) with dendritic cells (DCs) from healthy volunteers. END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells induced cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and secretion of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). CTLs targeted cells expressing αGal and END and tumor angiogenesis. The fused cell vaccine can effectively inhibit tumor growth and prolong the survival time of human hepatoma mice, indicating the high clinical potential of this new cell based vaccine.
© 2022 Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytotoxic T lymphocytes; Dendritic cells; Endoglin; Fusion cells; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Immunotherapy; Tumor neovascular endothelial cells; αGal

Year:  2022        PMID: 35865091      PMCID: PMC9293690          DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B        ISSN: 2211-3835            Impact factor:   14.903


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant cancer, ranking second in cancer-related deaths. Currently, hepatectomy is the only curative treatment. However, recurrence is common due to failure to completely remove the tumor tissue and unresectable advanced tumors. Non-surgical treatments for HCC such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy are generally ineffective and often cause serious side effects,. To tackle these challenges, T cell-based adoptive immunotherapy emerged as a promising alternative strategy. Immunotherapy involves extracting specific cell populations from a patient, activating and expanding them in vitro, and then transferring them back into the patient to elicit antitumor immune responses,. Dendritic cells (DCs) are specialized antigen presenting cells, which can effectively induce the activity of T cells. Therefore, fusion of DCs with tumor cells can activate cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to trigger effective tumor-specific immune response6, 7, 8. The high efficiency and specificity of this CTL-mediated cytotoxicity demonstrates the possibility of developing an effective cancer vaccine9, 10, 11. We conceived that expressing alpha-1,3-galactosyl epitope(αGal) on tumor cells could enhance the vaccination ability of tumor/DC fusion cells. Due to lack of α-1,3-galactosyltransferase (α1,3 GT), cell surface of human, ape and old-world monkey do not express αGal antigen, and there are natural antibodies in serum of these species. Engineering tumor cells to express αGal on their surface enables interaction with anti-αGal antibodies and subsequent recruitment of circulating complement factors to attack tumor cells, causing a cascade of amplified immune responses. In addition to antibody-mediated antitumor activity, αGal also promotes T cell activation and secretion of cytokines such as TNF-α, IFN-γ, granzyme B, and IP-10. Type one membrane glycoprotein endoglin (END) is mainly expressed on tumor neovascular endothelial cells, but rarely expressed in normal endothelial cells. It plays a vital role in the process of tumor vascular proliferation, which is closely related to tumor proliferation and invasion. It is recognized as a cancer-specific marker molecule for tumor neovascular endothelial cells,. Inhibiting END with antibodies or blocking its expression has shown therapeutic potential in animal studies17, 18, 19. Nevertheless, it has yet to be exploited as a targeted antigen in adoptive immunotherapy. We hypothesized that expressing END on tumor/DC fusion cells could create a vaccine against neovascular endothelial cells in tumors. In this manuscript we reported a new adoptive immunotherapy approach that simultaneously targets HCC and tumor neovascular endothelial cells. DCs fused with MHCC97H cells expressing both αGal and END to activate CTL, which produced cytotoxic effects on HCC cells and tumor neovascular endothelial cells. Human hepatocellular carcinoma developed by MHCC97H cell line, with strong invasiveness and rich blood vessels, was selected as the tumor treatment model in this study. We demonstrated the high efficiency and specificity of this CTL-mediated vaccine both in vitro and in vivo. The outstanding therapeutic effects were attributed to the fact that these fusion cells simultaneously presented entire HCC-specific antigens together with αGal and END to T cells and they could trigger potent and multifaceted immune responses to suppress tumor.

Material and methods

Cells and animals

The following cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA): A549 human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells, MHCC97H human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). A549 cells were cultured in complete RPMI-1640 medium (GIBCO, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO). MHCC97H cells stably expressing α1,3 GT or/and END and MHCC97H cells stably transduced with empty pLVX-Puro vector were generated using GenScript (Nanjing, China) and maintained in minimal essential medium (MEM; GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, and 0.35 μg/mL puromycin (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). HUVECs expressing endogenous END were cultured in complete RPMI-1640 media containing 10% FBS. Cells were cytogenetically tested and authenticated before freezing. Each vial of frozen cells was thawed and maintained for a maximum of 10 weeks. Specific pathogen-free, athymic nude BALB/c mice aged 4 weeks and weighing 16–18 g were provided by the Experimental Animal Center in Guangxi Medical University (Nanning, China). T cells were purified from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from 15 healthy human volunteers (aged 23–26, eight males, seven females). All human and animal experiments were performed according to the guidelines of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Association, and all protocols approved by the Animal and Human Ethics Committee of Guangxi Medical University (Nanning, China).

Construction and stable transduction of MHCC97H cells expressing α1,3 GT or/and END

Complementary DNAs encoding α1,3 GT or/and END were cloned into the lentiviral pLVX-Puro vectors. The three constructs were co-transfected together with Lenti-X HTX packaging plasmid (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA, USA) into Lenti-X 293T cells to generate virus stock for transducing MHCC97H cells. Stably transduced MHCC97H cells were selected by puromycin resistance and respectively named Gal+-MHCC97H, END+-MHCC97H and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H. The empty pLVX-puro lentiviral expression vector was used as control (pLVX-vector). Western blot was used to detect the expression of protein END. Expression of fusion protein α1,3 GT-END was assayed by immunofluorescence.

Isolation and generation of human T lymphocytes and DCs

PBMCs were isolated from fresh peripheral blood at room temperature using human lymphocyte separation medium (Dakewe Biotech, Shenzhen, China). After washing 3 times in RPMI-1640 (20 °C, 250 × g, 10 min), PBMCs were resuspended at a density of 1 × 107 cells/mL and seeded in a Corning Costar 6-well plate (Sigma–Aldrich). After incubating for 2 h, cells were collected and seeded in a new 6-well plate, and 20 U/mL of recombinant human interleukin-2 (rhIL-2) was added. T cells were then purified by filtering through a nylon wool column. The original 6-well plate that contained adherent cells was filled with two mL complete medium supplemented with 1000 U/mL of recombinant human granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) and 500 U/mL of rhIL-4. On Day 5, rhGM-CSF was reduced by half and 25 ng/mL of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) was added to the cells. All cytokines were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Preparation of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells

DCs cultured for 7 days were mixed in a 2:1 ratio with MHCC97H cells, MHCC97H[pLVX-Puro], END+-MHCC97H, Gal+-MHCC97H or END+/Gal+-MHCC97H that had been treated with 30-Gy radiation. The mixture in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was centrifuged at 200 × g for 10 min; the supernatant was removed, and polyethylene glycol (PEG; Sigma–Aldrich) was added to the cells, then incubated at 37 °C in a water bath for 5 min. RPMI-1640 medium was added to stop the reaction. Cells were centrifuged again, washed twice with PBS, and resuspended in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 500 U/mL rhGM-CSF, and 500 U/mL rhIL-4. This suspension was left standing for 24 h at 37 °C, after which the cells were considered to be MHCC97H/DC fusion cells.

Fluorescence detection

MHCC97H cells, MHCC97H[pLVX-Puro] cells, END+-MHCC97H cells, Gal+-MHCC97H cells and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells (5 × 105 cells/type) were incubated at 4 °C for 3 h with 10 μg/mL of Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated isolectin Griffonia simplicifolia-IB4 (GS-IB4; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The α1,3 GT enzyme encoded by the gene transduced them into MHCC97H cells that produced αGal, which bound the isolectin GS-IB4. FITC-conjugated anti human END antibody bound the expression of END on cells. Fluorescently labeled cells were detected using laser scanning confocal microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Epics XL-MCL, Danvers, MA, USA). The expression of CD83, CD86, HLA-DR and HLA-ABC on the surface of DCs was detected by flow cytometry. Data was analyzed with Kaluza Analysis Software (Ashland, OR, USA).

Western blot analysis of fusion cells

END+/Gal+-MHCC97H, Gal+-MHCC97H, END+-MHCC97H, and MHCC97H[pLVX-Puro] cells were disrupted in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Total protein concentration was determined using BCA Protein Quantification Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). Equal amounts of protein from different cells were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Nonspecific binding was blocked using 5% (w/v) non-fat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST). The membrane was incubated at 4 °C overnight with a mouse anti-human END monoclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). After washing 3 times with TBS-T, the membrane was incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody (ZSGB-Bio, Beijing, China). Protein bands were visualized using the diaminobenzidine (DAB) kit (SolarBio, Beijing, China).

Cytotoxicity of fusion cell-stimulated CTLs

Cytotoxicity of fusion cell-stimulated CTLs was analyzed by radioactive 51Cr release assays. T lymphocytes were incubated with different types of fusion cells for 7 days. 293T, A549, HUVEC, MHCC97H, END+-MHCC97H, Gal+-MHCC97H and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells were labeled with 51Cr and seeded into 96-well plates (1 × 104 cells/well). Stimulated T lymphocytes were added to the wells at effector/target (E/T) ratios of 3:1, 10:1, or 30:1. 51Cr release was counted on a γ radiation counter and measured in counts per minute (cpm). Maximum release was determined from supernatants of cells that were lysed by addition of 5% Triton X-100. Spontaneous release was determined from target cells incubated without added effector cells. Wells were incubated for 5 h, and cpm were measured in the culture supernatant fraction using a γ radiation counter. The percent specific cytotoxicity was calculated using Eq. (1):

Assay of interleukin and interferon by fusion cells

The five types of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL and cultured for 48 h before collecting the supernatant. Secreted IL-12p70 was measured using an ELISA kit purchased from R&D Systems. Human IFN-γ was assayed using ELISPOT as follows: Fusion cells were mixed with T cells at a ratio of 1:10 and cultured in ELISPOT plates precoated with human IFN-γ antibody (Dakewe Biotech, Shenzhen, China). After 7 days, cells were disrupted and a biotin-labeled detection antibody was added, followed by HRP-conjugated streptavidin. Spots were visualized and analyzed using a CTL-ImmunoSpot Analyzer (Cellular Technology, Shaker Heights, OH, USA).

T cell-based adoptive transfer

BALB/c nude male mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 20 in each group). MHCC97H cells in the log growth phase were collected and resuspended at a density of 2 × 106 cells/mL, and 100 μL of cell suspension was subcutaneously injected into the right axilla of each mouse. T cells previously stimulated by mixing at a ratio of one fusion cell per 10 T cells for 7 days and then filtering through nylon wool. On Days 5, 12, 19, 26, and 33, mice were injected in the tail veins with stimulated T cells (5 × 106/mouse). Control mice were injected MHCC97H cells instead of stimulated T cells. On Day 33 after the mice had received five adoptive transfers, five mice from each group were sacrificed, and tumor samples were taken for immunohistochemical analysis. Tumor volumes (length × width2 × 0.5) was measured every 5 days. Mice were followed for 90 days or until death in order to calculate the survival rate.

Immunohistochemistry of tumor sections

The frequency of apoptotic cells in tumor tissue sections were determined by TUNEL detection kit (Roche, Swiss). All images were screened under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Paraffin sections were cut from tumor tissue blocks and stained with a mouse monoclonal antibody against human proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) following manufacturer's instructions (Boster, Wuhan, China). Expression of CD31 was detected in frozen sections of tumor tissues as follows: frozen sections were fixed in cold acetone for 10 min, blocked using 5% bovine serum albumin at 37 °C for 30 min, and incubated at 4 °C overnight with a rat monoclonal antibody against mouse CD31 (1:400; Abcam, Shanghai, China). Sections were then stained with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-rat secondary antibody (ZSGB-Bio, Signal was developed using a DAB detection kit (ZSGB-Bio, Beijing, China).

Bioinformatics analysis

Gene_DE module was used to study the differential expression between tumor and adjacent normal tissues for any gene of interest across all TCGA tumor. Distributions of END gene expression levels were displayed using box plots. The statistical significance computed by the Wilcoxon test was annotated by the number of stars. (∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001). Then, definitions and outcomes of overall survival (OS) were extracted from the TCGA-Clinical Data (n = 364). Datasets assigned to high- and low-risk groups based on the risk score.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences between two groups were assessed for significance using one-way ANOVA, while differences between more than two groups were assessed using Bonferroni's multiple-comparison procedures. Survival rates were determined using Kaplan–Meier survival curves, which were compared between groups using the log-rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Generation of MHCC97H cells stably expressing α1,3 GT/END fusion protein

Fusion plasmid consisting of α1,3 GT and END extracellular domain were subcloned downstream of the tumor-specific hTERT promoter in a lentiviral vector and stably transduced into MHCC97H cells (Supporting Information Fig. S1A). In parallel, fusion plasmids of only α1,3 GT or END were also transduced into MHCC97H cells for comparison. α1,3 GT-END fusion plasmid was predicted to have a molecular weight of 100 kDa, comprised of α1,3 GT (35 kDa), and END extracellular domain (65 kDa). Western blot analysis confirmed expression of the desired fusion proteins in END+/Gal+-MHCC97H (Fig. S1B). In addition, the proper function of α1,3 GT was confirmed by detecting production of αGal, which bound Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated glycoprotein GS-IB4. The expression of END on cells was detected by FITC-conjugated anti human END antibody. As expected, END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells were labeled by red and green, Gal+-MHCC97H cells were labeled by red, END+-MHCC97H were labeled by green; whereas, MHCC97H (pLVX-Puro) and MHCC97H cells were not labeled (Fig. 1A–D). These results indicated that a stable expression of the exogenous fusion protein α1,3 GT-END was successfully achieved.
Figure 1

Generation of END+-MHCC97H, Gal+-MHCC97H and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells. (A) Immunofluorescence was used to detect the expression of END, α1,3 GT, and α1,3 GT-END in MHCC97H cells. END+-MHCC97H cells were bound by FITC-conjugated anti-human END antibody; Gal+-MHCC97H cells were stained by Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated isolectin GS-IB4 lectin; END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells were labeled by both fluorescent dye. MHCC97H cells were used as negative controls. Red: GS-IB4; Green: anti-human END antibody; Blue: nucleus. (Original magnification, 400 ×; Scale bar, 50 μm). (B) Expression of α1,3 GT and END in MHCC97H, MHCC97H (pLVX-Puro), END+-MHCC97H, Gal+-MHCC97H and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells were assessed by flow cytometry. Quantitative analysis for immunofluorescence (C) and flow cytometry (D). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ns stands for no difference. Data are representative of at least three individual experiments and are presented as mean ± SD.

Generation of END+-MHCC97H, Gal+-MHCC97H and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells. (A) Immunofluorescence was used to detect the expression of END, α1,3 GT, and α1,3 GT-END in MHCC97H cells. END+-MHCC97H cells were bound by FITC-conjugated anti-human END antibody; Gal+-MHCC97H cells were stained by Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated isolectin GS-IB4 lectin; END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells were labeled by both fluorescent dye. MHCC97H cells were used as negative controls. Red: GS-IB4; Green: anti-human END antibody; Blue: nucleus. (Original magnification, 400 ×; Scale bar, 50 μm). (B) Expression of α1,3 GT and END in MHCC97H, MHCC97H (pLVX-Puro), END+-MHCC97H, Gal+-MHCC97H and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells were assessed by flow cytometry. Quantitative analysis for immunofluorescence (C) and flow cytometry (D). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ns stands for no difference. Data are representative of at least three individual experiments and are presented as mean ± SD.

Fusions between DC and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells

All five types of fusion cells possessed the DC markers including CD83 and CD86, HLA-ABC, and HLA-DR (Fig. 2A and B). They had the characteristics of typical mature DCs, and expressed α1,3 GT, or/and END (Fig. 2C and D). The successful fusion between green fluorescence labelled DCs and red fluorescence labelled MHCC97H cells was confirmed by fluorescence microscope (Supporting Information Fig. S2).
Figure 2

Detection of cell surface markers and production of IL-12p70 by five types of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells. Flow cytometry was used to assess the expression of cell surface markers, including CD83, CD86, HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, END and αGal. Flow cytometry analysis of CD83, CD86, HLA-ABC, and HLA-DR (A) and quantitative analysis (B). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of END as well as αGal. (D) Quantitative analysis. (E) ELISA was used to assay levels of IL-12p70 secreted after 48 h culture. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ns stands for no difference. Data show mean ± SD and individual values from three independent experiments.

Detection of cell surface markers and production of IL-12p70 by five types of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells. Flow cytometry was used to assess the expression of cell surface markers, including CD83, CD86, HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, END and αGal. Flow cytometry analysis of CD83, CD86, HLA-ABC, and HLA-DR (A) and quantitative analysis (B). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of END as well as αGal. (D) Quantitative analysis. (E) ELISA was used to assay levels of IL-12p70 secreted after 48 h culture. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ns stands for no difference. Data show mean ± SD and individual values from three independent experiments.

END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells secrete more IL-12p70

Culturing the fusion cells for 48 h and then assaying production of IL-12p70 showed that END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC and Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells secreted significantly more of this interleukin than END+-MHCC97H/DC, DC/MHCC97H (pLVX-Puro), or MHCC97H/DC fusion cells (Fig. 2E, P < 0.001). This was expected, as αGal is known to enhance IL-12p70 production. IL-12p70 is an important cytokine that mediates cellular immunity. In addition to increasing the killing activity of NK/LAK, IL-12P70 can also stimulate CTLs to exert anti-tumor effects.

END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells stimulate T cell-mediated cytotoxic response and IFN-γ production from T cells

T cells induced by any of the five fusion cell types showed minimal cytotoxicity against 293T cells or A549 cells (Fig. 3A and B), suggesting their high therapeutic specificity. T cells activated by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC or Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells showed significantly greater cytotoxicity against MHCC97H cells than T cells activated by other fusion cell types. On the other hand, T cells activated by fusion cells expressing the extracellular domain of END showed greater toxicity against HUVEC cells (Fig. 3C and D). Similar to MHCC97H Cells, END+-MHCC97H cells, Gal+-MHCC97H cells, and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H cells were able to exert cytotoxic effects (Fig. 3E–G). END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells stimulated CTLs against both tumor cells and tumor neovascular endothelial cells. In other words, they not only induced direct killing of tumor cells, but also cut the nutrient supply to tumor tissue. In contrast, 293T cells and A549 cells did not express END (Supporting Information Fig. S3). At a ratio of T cells to target cells 30:1, T cells primed by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells showed much greater cytoxicity against MHCC97H, END+-MHCC97H, Gal+-MHCC97H, END+/Gal+-MHCC97H and HUVEC cells, than against 293T and A549 cells (Fig. 3H).
Figure 3

Cytotoxicity of T cells against 51Cr-labeled target cells after induction by different types of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells, at different ratios of effector cells (T cells) to target cells (E:T). Target cells were (A) 293T, (B) A549, (C) HUVEC, (D) MHCC97H, (E) END+-MHCC97H, (F) Gal+-MHCC97H, and (G) END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC. (H) Cytotoxicity of T cells stimulated by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells was compared for other indicated target cells. In all cases, the ratio of T cells to target cells was 30:1. Measurement of IFN-γ-producing T cells following 7-day co-culture of with different types of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells. (I) Representative ELISPOT results. (J) Average numbers of IFN-γ-producing T cells per sample of 3 × 105 T cells. Spot numbers of Gal+-MHCC97H/DC and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells were significantly greater than that of other fusion cell types. ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ns stands for no difference. Data are representative of at least three individual experiments and are presented as mean ± SD.

Cytotoxicity of T cells against 51Cr-labeled target cells after induction by different types of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells, at different ratios of effector cells (T cells) to target cells (E:T). Target cells were (A) 293T, (B) A549, (C) HUVEC, (D) MHCC97H, (E) END+-MHCC97H, (F) Gal+-MHCC97H, and (G) END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC. (H) Cytotoxicity of T cells stimulated by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells was compared for other indicated target cells. In all cases, the ratio of T cells to target cells was 30:1. Measurement of IFN-γ-producing T cells following 7-day co-culture of with different types of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells. (I) Representative ELISPOT results. (J) Average numbers of IFN-γ-producing T cells per sample of 3 × 105 T cells. Spot numbers of Gal+-MHCC97H/DC and END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells were significantly greater than that of other fusion cell types. ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ns stands for no difference. Data are representative of at least three individual experiments and are presented as mean ± SD. IFN-γ can inhibit tumor cell proliferation by regulating the expression of a variety of proliferation-related genes, blocking the tumor cell cycle, and promoting tumor cell apoptosis. It can up-regulate the activity of various immune cells such as DCs, macrophages, B cells, and T cells. Co-culturing T cells with fusion cells and then measuring the number of T cells producing IFN-γ showed that the numbers were significantly higher with END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC or Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells than with other fusion cell types (Fig. 3I and J). It suggested that αGal stimulated T cells to secrete this cytokine.

Vaccines based on END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cell inhibit tumor growth in nude mice bearing human and prolong survival

The fusion cell-stimulated T cells (5 × 106) were injected into the tumor-bearing mice through their tail veins. The control group was injected with 100 μL PBS (Fig. 4A). Average hepatoma volume was smaller in mice receiving T cells stimulated by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells than in mice receiving T cells stimulated by Gal+-MHCC97H/DC or END+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells (Fig. 4B), implying the synergistic effects of Gal and END. By Day 90, 11 of 15 mice (73%) that had received T cells stimulated with END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells were alive, while all mice in other treatment groups had died (Fig. 4C). The TUNEL assay revealed that END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells caused a significant increase in the number of apoptotic cells in tumor tissues, as compared to other groups (Fig. 5A and B). PCNA is an indicator of cell proliferation. CD31 can be used to estimate tumor microvessel density and as an indicator of tumor microangiogenesis. Immunohistochemistry of tumor sections indicated significantly fewer PCNA or CD31 positive cells in mice that received T cells stimulated by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells than other groups (Fig. 5C–F). Importantly, we found no toxicity in heart, liver, lung or kidney tissue of mice injected with stimulated T cells by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC (Supporting Information Fig. S4).
Figure 4

Antitumor effects of T cells induced by different types of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells. (A) Mice injected with MHCC97H cells (2 × 106 cells/mouse on Day 0) were treated with stimulated T cells once a week (from Day 5 to Day 33). (B) Tumor volume was measured every 5 days from Day 5 to Day 35. Tumors were significantly smaller in mice treated with T cells primed by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells than in mice treated with T cells primed by other types of fusion cells. ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (by Day 35). (C) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of hepatoma-bearing nude mice (n = 15 in each group). Curves were compared using the log-rank test. ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.

Figure 5

Mice had been injected with PBS or T cells stimulated by one of the following types of fusion cells: MHCC97H/DC, MHCC97H (pLVX-Puro)/DC, END+-MHCC97H/DC, Gal+-MHCC97H/DC, END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC. T cells stimulated by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells increased tumor cell apoptosis and inhibited their proliferation and microvessel formation in hepatoma-bearing nude mice. Cells apoptosis in tumor tissues of mice that received different treatments were detected by TUNEL. (A) TUNEL staining in the tumor tissues of mice that received different treatments (Original magnification, 200 ×; scale bar, 100 μm). (B) The mean and standard deviation of TUNEL staining in each group. (C) PCNA staining in tumor tissues of mice that received different treatments (Original magnification, 400 ×; scale bar, 50 μm). (D) PCNA-positive cells were counted in five randomly selected fields of tumor thin sections. Quantitative analysis for average numbers of positive cells. (E) Expression of CD31 in tumor tissues of mice that received different treatments (Original magnification, 200 ×; scale bar, 100 μm). (F) CD31-positive microvessels were counted in five randomly selected fields of tumor thin sections. Quantitative analysis for average numbers of microvessels. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. Data are representative of at least three individual experiments and are presented as mean ± SD.

Antitumor effects of T cells induced by different types of MHCC97H/DC fusion cells. (A) Mice injected with MHCC97H cells (2 × 106 cells/mouse on Day 0) were treated with stimulated T cells once a week (from Day 5 to Day 33). (B) Tumor volume was measured every 5 days from Day 5 to Day 35. Tumors were significantly smaller in mice treated with T cells primed by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells than in mice treated with T cells primed by other types of fusion cells. ∗∗∗P < 0.001 (by Day 35). (C) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of hepatoma-bearing nude mice (n = 15 in each group). Curves were compared using the log-rank test. ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Mice had been injected with PBS or T cells stimulated by one of the following types of fusion cells: MHCC97H/DC, MHCC97H (pLVX-Puro)/DC, END+-MHCC97H/DC, Gal+-MHCC97H/DC, END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC. T cells stimulated by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells increased tumor cell apoptosis and inhibited their proliferation and microvessel formation in hepatoma-bearing nude mice. Cells apoptosis in tumor tissues of mice that received different treatments were detected by TUNEL. (A) TUNEL staining in the tumor tissues of mice that received different treatments (Original magnification, 200 ×; scale bar, 100 μm). (B) The mean and standard deviation of TUNEL staining in each group. (C) PCNA staining in tumor tissues of mice that received different treatments (Original magnification, 400 ×; scale bar, 50 μm). (D) PCNA-positive cells were counted in five randomly selected fields of tumor thin sections. Quantitative analysis for average numbers of positive cells. (E) Expression of CD31 in tumor tissues of mice that received different treatments (Original magnification, 200 ×; scale bar, 100 μm). (F) CD31-positive microvessels were counted in five randomly selected fields of tumor thin sections. Quantitative analysis for average numbers of microvessels. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. Data are representative of at least three individual experiments and are presented as mean ± SD.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that genetically engineered END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells as a vaccine can stimulate CTLs to suppress tumor growth and increase survival of mice bearing human HCC. The remarkable efficacy is attributable to synergistic immune-triggering effects from αGal and END co-expressed on fusion cells. Tumor cell vaccine expressing αGal requires in vivo binding of anti-αGal antibodies to DCs in the circulation in order to present tumor antigens to T cells. Therefore, since the amount of DCs in circulation is destitute, the number of T cells being activated was insufficient. Consequently, the antitumor effects of such vaccine would be limited. In comparison, our method was not restricted by the number of circulating DCs, because the αGal expressed by fusion cells maybe promote DCs to efficiently recognize known and unknown tumor antigens and present them to T cells. In addition, αGal, a heterologous antigen, strongly stimulates the rapid proliferation of T cells. END+/Gal+- MHCC97H/DC and Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells could abundantly secrete IL-12p70 and promote CTLs to produce IFN-γ. It was speculated that αGal played an important role in the promoting maturation of DCs, thereby promoting the presentation of antigens by DCs. Besides, these CTLs stimulated by END+/Gal+-MHCC97H/DC fusion cells were potently cytotoxic against MHCC97H (including END+/Gal+-MHCC97H and END–/Gal–-MHCC97H) and HUVEC cells. This is consistent with previously reported in the literature that the IL-12p70 secreted by mature DC could promote the secretion of IFN-γ from T cells and enhance the killing function of T cells. The ability of αGal to promote antigen presentation in fusion cells may also be related to antigen cross-presentation, and further experiments are still needed. In order to maximize the efficiency of cell adoptive immunotherapy, DCs must strongly present as many immunogenic antigens as possible (e.g., tumor antigens, tumor vascular antigens, etc.) to T cells23, 24, 25. However, the current CAR-T cells can only target some known tumor antigens, not unknown others. Whereas, the CTLs induced by tumor/DC fusion cells can target the unknown antigens as well as known ones. Besides, our current strategy allows DCs to present not only more known and unknown tumor antigens, but also αGal and END to T cells via antigen cross-presentation. Therefore, it is regarded as a bifunctional tumor vaccine which can both target tumor cells and tumor neovascular endothelial cells. The hyperacute rejection against tumors induced by αGal extended to the neovascular endothelial cells of the tumor, which significantly enhanced the potency of CTLs against the entire tumor tissue. Based on the TCGA database, we analyzed the difference in the expression level of END between a variety of tumors and non-tumor tissues. The results showed that most tumors such as CHOL, ESCA, HNSC, KIRC, STAD, THCA, etc., had significantly different END expression levels from non-tumor tissues (Supporting Information Fig. S5A). Furthermore, we observed a marked difference in OS between high- and low-risk groups based on the risk score. The results showed that the survival time of HCC patients with high END expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with low expression (Fig. S5B). The anti-tumor effects against tumor blood vessels could suppress tumor and also inhibit metastasis by depriving its nutrition supply26, 27, 28. This study has certain limitation that the bifunctional tumor vaccine is not directly injected into tumor-bearing mice to observe its anti-tumor effect, and need to be explored in subsequent studies. This research used MHCC97H tumor as a representative to confirm the effectiveness of the vaccine. The further study will be carried out to verify the feasibility of the vaccine in lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, etc. In summary, this work demonstrated a new strategy for cell-based vaccinations against tumors.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that DCs fused with MHCC97H cells and expressed both αGal and END, the resulting fusion cells were then used to activate CTLs. The activated T cells effectively inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival of mice bearing human hepatomas, suggesting an effective clinical potential for this new cell-based vaccine.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Dendritic cells in cancer immunology and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Stefanie K Wculek; Francisco J Cueto; Adriana M Mujal; Ignacio Melero; Matthew F Krummel; David Sancho
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Dendritic cell tracking and modulation.

Authors:  Joshua M Gammon; Christopher M Jewell
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  A dendritic cell multitasks to tackle cancer.

Authors:  Marianne Burbage; Sebastian Amigorena
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Cancer immunotherapy with recombinant poliovirus induces IFN-dominant activation of dendritic cells and tumor antigen-specific CTLs.

Authors:  Michael C Brown; Eda K Holl; David Boczkowski; Elena Dobrikova; Mubeen Mosaheb; Vidya Chandramohan; Darell D Bigner; Matthias Gromeier; Smita K Nair
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Complement activation by human IgG antibodies to galactose-α-1,3-galactose.

Authors:  Jens Magnus Bernth Jensen; Nick Stub Laursen; Rasmus Kjeldsen Jensen; Gregers Rom Andersen; Jens Christian Jensenius; Uffe B Skov Sørensen; Steffen Thiel
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Upregulation of T-cell Immunoglobulin and Mucin-Domain Containing-3 (Tim-3) in Monocytes/Macrophages Associates with Gastric Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Zhenxin Wang; Ni Yin; Zixiang Zhang; Yi Zhang; Guangbo Zhang; Weichang Chen
Journal:  Immunol Invest       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 7.  Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy.

Authors:  Rachel L Sabado; Sreekumar Balan; Nina Bhardwaj
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 25.617

8.  Anti-CD105 Antibody Eliminates Tumor Microenvironment Cells and Enhances Anti-GD2 Antibody Immunotherapy of Neuroblastoma with Activated Natural Killer Cells.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Wu; Michael A Sheard; Jemily Malvar; G Esteban Fernandez; Yves A DeClerck; Laurence Blavier; Hiroyuki Shimada; Charles P Theuer; Richard Sposto; Robert C Seeger
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Cancer immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer utilizing α-gal epitope/natural anti-Gal antibody reaction.

Authors:  Masahiro Tanemura; Eiji Miyoshi; Hiroaki Nagano; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Katsuyoshi Matsunami; Kiyomi Taniyama; Nobutaka Hatanaka; Hiroki Akamatsu; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Systemic treatment of HCC in special populations.

Authors:  Lorenza Rimassa; Nicola Personeni; Carolin Czauderna; Friedrich Foerster; Peter Galle
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 25.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.