Literature DB >> 35865026

Iliofemoral Tortuosity Increases the Risk of Access-Site-Related Complications After Aortic Valve Implantation and Plug-Based Access-Site Closure.

Arpad Lux1,2, Lisa Müllenberg3, Leo F Veenstra1, Wim Dohmen4, Suzanne Kats3, Bart Maesen2,3, Arnoud W J Van't Hof1,2,5.   

Abstract

Background: Access-site-related complications are often related to high-risk anatomy and technical pitfalls and impair the outcomes of transfemoral aortic valve implantations (TAVIs). Calcification and tortuosity are widely recognized risk factors, and their impact on procedural planning is left to the implanting experts' discretion. To facilitate decision-making, we introduced a quantitative measure for iliofemoral tortuosity and assessed its predictive value for access-site-related vascular and bleeding complications.
Methods: We performed a single-centre prospective cohort study of consecutive, percutaneous transfemoral TAVI performed between April 2019 and March 2020. Medical history and all-cause mortality were extracted from the electronic patient files. Arterial anatomy and calcifications were evaluated using 3mensio Structural Heart software. The primary outcome was access-site-related vascular or bleeding complications.
Results: In this elderly, intermediate-risk population, we registered the primary outcome in 43 patients (39%), and major access-site complications in 10 patients (9.2%). Complete hemostasis was achieved in 77 patients (70.6%), by the application of the MANTA plug alone. In the group with access-site-related adverse events, compared with the group without, the tortuosity index was higher median (26% interquartile range [IQR 18%-33%] vs median 19% [IQR 13%-29%], respectively; P = 0.012), as was maximal angulation median (50° [IQR 40°-59°] vs median 43° [IQR 36°-51°], respectively; P = 0.026) were higher. Both variables had a significant effect on our primary outcome, with odds ratios (OR) of 3.1 (tortuosity, P = 0.005) and 2.6 (angulation, P = 0.020). The degree of angulation was a predictor of major complications too (odds ratio 7 [1.4-34.8]; P = 0.017). Conclusions: Steeper angles and greater arterial elongation increase the risk of vascular and bleeding complications after femoral TAVI with the utilization of a plug-based closure device.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35865026      PMCID: PMC9294987          DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJC Open        ISSN: 2589-790X


Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-accepted, truly minimally invasive method to treat severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.1, 2, 3 The implantation can be performed via multiple access sites, but the transfemoral (TF) approach is not only the most common but also the safest option. Despite its relative safety, access-site-related vascular and bleeding complications have an unfavourable effect on the outcomes of TF TAVIs, and a large number of patients could benefit from the prevention of these complications.5, 6, 7 We know that patient-related factors and technical pitfalls, usually in combination with the specific properties of the applied closure device or technique, increase the risk of these complications.8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Interestingly, the role of iliofemoral tortuosity and the amount of vascular calcification remained, until this year, unexplored.10, 11, 12, 13 Therefore, we designed a study to prove that vascular calcifications and arterial tortuosity are relevant predictors of vascular and bleeding complications following TF TAVI and plug-based access-site closure.

Methods

Study design and population

We performed a single-centre prospective cohort study of consecutive, percutaneous TF TAVIs performed between April 2019 and March 2020. The only inclusion criterion was that access-site closure had to be attempted with a plug-based device (MANTA vascular closure device, Teleflex Inc., Wayne, PA). Relevant medical history and all-cause mortality data were extracted from the electronic patient files. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Maastricht University and Maastricht UMC+; approval number: METC 2019-1253.

Valve implantation and access-site handling

In a dedicated hybrid operating theatre, all TF valve implantations were performed with patients under conscious sedation. At least one of the operators was highly experienced (> 3 years of experience and > 40 TF implantations per year; 4 members of the team). Echo-guided arterial puncture was left to the operator’s discretion. Patients were treated with either a balloon-expandable (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) or a self-expandable (Medtronic plc, Minneapolis, MN) valve. Per protocol, valves were advanced via their manufacturer-dedicated sheaths (e-sheath [Edwards Lifesciences] or InLine sheath [Medtronic] / sheathless). If the usual preoperative assessment suggested significant tortuosity, then the self-expandable valves were advanced via a guiding-sheath from Cook Medical (Bloomington, IN). Per protocol, a plug-based vascular closure device was used (MANTA). Device deployment depth was based on the stop-flow measurement. Until December 2019, 2.0 cm was added to the measured depth; after December 2019, this depth was reduced to 1 cm per a change in the manufacturer instructions. Any needed venous puncture was performed on the contralateral side. Anticoagulation and any other antiplatelet therapy other than acetylsalicylic acid were discontinued before the procedure. Anticoagulation was bridged in the following specific situations: atrial fibrillation with a Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75 Years) (doubled), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke (doubled), Vascular Disease, Age (65-74) Years, Sex Category (Female) (CHA2DS2-VASc) score ≥ 8; mechanical heart valves (not in aortic position); and venous thromboembolism for ≤ 3 months. Bridging was carried out using low-molecular-weight heparin until the day of the procedure. Compression bandage was not routinely placed.

Assessment of vascular and bleeding complications

Arterial closure was scored with a semi-subjective classification: complete arterial hemostasis (minimal subcutaneous oozing permitted); manual compression for > 10 minutes; and pressure bandage or surgical intervention required. Vascular and bleeding complications of the TAVI access site were closely monitored and registered until the fourth postoperative day. Complications of the adjunctive arterial access sites were not included in this analysis, including daily inspection and palpation of the inguinal area and monitoring of hemoglobin levels. An ultrasound examination was done in cases of suspicion of a possible pseudoaneurysm. Pseudoaneurysms were treated according to the advice of vascular surgeons (eg, thrombin injections or surgical repair). At 6 weeks of regular follow-up, patients were asked if they had any access-site-related problems, which were then examined and/or treated by a medical professional.

Assessment of iliofemoral anatomy

All patients who were accepted for TAVI were screened with multidetector computed tomography angiography to assess the access routes and determine appropriate valve sizes. These images were analyzed using 3mensio Structural Heart software (version 10.0, Pie Medical Imaging BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands). Tortuosity index, angulation, and calcification index were determined for the iliofemoral tract of the access site. We adapted 2 quantification methods to adequately measure tortuosity and calcification. To acquire a tortuosity index, the true arterial length (centreline of flow) and the direct distance between the aortic bifurcation and the femoral bifurcation were measured, and their relation was determined: ([centreline of flow / direct distance] - 1) ∗ 100)., Maximal angulation was measured over the centreline with an arm length of 15 mm. (Fig. 1)
Figure 1

Vascular assessment of the preoperative multidetector computed tomography angiography. (A) Tortuosity index: ([centreline {shown by the yellow line} of flow distance / direct distance {shown by the white line}] – 1) ∗100; an example of a patient with (left) a low tortuosity index and (right) a high tortuosity index. (B) Maximal angulation; measured over the centreline with an arm length of 15 mm; an example of a patient with (left) a low maximal angulation and (right) a high maximal angulation. The measured angle is demonstrated on the left side (white lines). (C) Calcification index; calcium volume and total vessel volume were measured using the Hounsfield unit; an example of a patient with (left) a non-calcified iliofemoral tract and (right) a severely calcified iliofemoral tract.

Vascular assessment of the preoperative multidetector computed tomography angiography. (A) Tortuosity index: ([centreline {shown by the yellow line} of flow distance / direct distance {shown by the white line}] – 1) ∗100; an example of a patient with (left) a low tortuosity index and (right) a high tortuosity index. (B) Maximal angulation; measured over the centreline with an arm length of 15 mm; an example of a patient with (left) a low maximal angulation and (right) a high maximal angulation. The measured angle is demonstrated on the left side (white lines). (C) Calcification index; calcium volume and total vessel volume were measured using the Hounsfield unit; an example of a patient with (left) a non-calcified iliofemoral tract and (right) a severely calcified iliofemoral tract. Calcification was measured between the aortic bifurcation and the femoral bifurcation, as this trajectory corresponds well to the length of sheath used for the introduction of the delivery device, and both locations are easily and reproducibly identified. Calcium volume (in mm3) was quantified using an individual Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold to compensate for the contrast-agent density. The HU of 3 noncalcified sections in the selected area was measured and averaged, and an additional 200 HU was added to this number, and a volume filter for lesions smaller than 5 mm3 was applied. To obtain the calcification index, the calcium volume was divided by the total volume of the selected area (total vessel volume) and multiplied by 100. We also performed a semiquantitative calcification scoring as previously described: 0, no calcification; 1, mild calcification; 2, moderate calcification; and 3, severe calcification., Finally, the minimal arterial lumen diameter of the iliofemoral tract was measured.

Endpoints

The primary outcome was any access-site-related vascular or bleeding complication, as defined by the most recent Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 criteria. For each patient, the most severe periprocedural complication was scored. Secondary outcomes included the state of the access site directly after MANTA closure, post-procedural hospitalization. Complications related to the non-TAVI access sites were not included in the analysis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). All continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median with interquartile range (IQR), depending on the distribution. Normality was tested with normality plots and the Shapiro-Wilk test, and group comparisons were done with the Student t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies with percentages, and were compared with the χ2 test. The correlation of calcification index and calcium score was tested with bivariate correlation and described with the Pearson coefficient. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with access-site-related vascular or bleeding complications after MANTA closure. Cutoff values for tortuosity index and angulation were selected by visual analysis of their empirical receiver operating characteristic curves (vascular and bleeding complications registered). Both variables were added as categorical variables to the univariable regression model. For the multivariable model, the tortuosity index and angulation were merged as one categorical variable with 3 categories—high TI, high angulation, or both. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Within the study period, 109 eligible patients consented to participate in our registry. Their baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Most of these elderly patients (median age: 79 years [IQR 75-81 years]) were at intermediate surgical risk (Logistic EuroScore median 7.24 [IQR 4.61-10.84]), had hypertension (88%) and hypercholesterolemia (77%), and used at least one type of anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent (81%). The prevalence of peripheral artery disease was rather low (11%).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll patients (n = 109)With complication (n = 43)Without complication (n = 66)P
Age, y79 [75–81]79 [75–81]79 [74–82]0.867
Female gender49 (45)15 (35)34 (52)0.088
BMI, kg/m227.2 [24.2–30.5]27.3 [24.3–30.6]27.2 (24.6–29.8)0.963
Logistic EuroSCORE7.24 (4.61–10.84)6.13 [4.46–9.13]7.72 [4.73–12.25]0.223
COPD16 (15)6 (14)10 (15)0.863
Peripheral artery disease12 (11)3 (7)9 (14)0.358
Hypercholesterolemia77 (71)32 (74)45 (68)0.485
Pulmonary hypertension36 (33)15 (35)21 (32)0.739
Hypertension96 (88)37 (86)59 (89)0.598
History of CVA or TIA19 (17)8 (19)11 (17)0.794
Prior cardiac surgery15 (14)5 (12)10 (15)0.602
 Aortic valve4 (4)13
 Mitral valve1 (1)10
Preoperative hemoglobin, mmol/L8.0 ± 0.968.2 ± 0.847.9 ± 1.020.118
Preoperative kidney function, ml/min per 1.73 m263 [47–76]68 [52–76]61 [47–76]0.466
Severely decreased kidney function (GFR < 30)11 (10)3 (7)8 (12)0.522
Aortic valve area, cm20.8 [0.7–0.9]0.80 [0.66–0.90]0.80 [0.70–0.96]0.314
Mean pressure gradient, mm Hg44 [36–60]49 (39–63)40 [34–53]0.062
Left ventricular ejection fraction, %55 [45–60]55 (45–60)55 [45–60]0.660
Type of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy0.962
 OAC15 (14)7 (16)8 (12)
 NOAC24 (22)9 (21)15 (23)
 Antiplatelet therapy47 (43)18 (42)29 (44)
 (N)OAC and antiplatelet agent2 (2)1 (2)1 (2)
INR1.05 [1.01–1.15]1.06 [1.02–1.17]1.04 [1.01–1.14]0.518

Values are n (%), mean (± standard deviation), or median [interquartile range], unless otherwise specified.

BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; EuroSCORE, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; INR, international normalized ratio; NOAC, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant; OAC, oral anticoagulant, vitamin K antagonist; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Aortic valve area n = 98.

Mean pressure gradient n = 93.

INR n = 100.

Baseline characteristics Values are n (%), mean (± standard deviation), or median [interquartile range], unless otherwise specified. BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; EuroSCORE, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; INR, international normalized ratio; NOAC, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant; OAC, oral anticoagulant, vitamin K antagonist; TIA, transient ischemic attack. Aortic valve area n = 98. Mean pressure gradient n = 93. INR n = 100.

Access site and valve placement

In almost all patients (97%), a right-sided approach was used, and in 23%, femoral arterial access was obtained under ultrasound guidance. In 8.7%, more than one arterial puncture attempt was required. Interventional cardiologists performed 76% of the procedures. Balloon-expandable valves were implanted in 60% of the patients. Operators closed all TAVI access sites with an 18 Fr-sized MANTA. Patients with vs without TAVI access-site-related vascular and bleeding complications (major and/or minor) had comparable 30-day and 1-year mortality rates (Table 2). Patients with major vascular and bleeding complications had higher 1-year mortality than those without (3 [30%] vs 6 [6.1%]). In 7 cases, the cause of death is unknown; the other deaths were not access-site-related (hemorrhagic stroke and cancer).
Table 2

Procedural characteristics and post-procedural survival

Total study sampleAll patients (n = 109)Vascular/bleeding complications (n = 43)No vascular/bleeding complications (n = 66)P
Echo-guided puncture25 (23)14 (33)11 (17)0.054
Right-sided access site106 (97)43 (100)63 (95)0.156
Puncture attempts > 18 (8.7)4 (11.8)4 (6.9)0.461
Self-expanding valve44 (40)22 (51)22 (33)0.064
Sheath type0.255
 Cook21 (20.6)11 (28.9)10 (15.6)
 eSheath65 (63.7)21 (55.3)44 (68.8)
 Sheathless16 (15.7)6 (15.8)10 (15.6)
Sheath size, Fr16 [14–16]16 [14–20]15 [14–16]0.107
18-Fr-sized MANTA109 (100)43 (100)66 (100)
Flow stop measurement, cm3.5 [3.0–4.0]3.5 [3.0–4.0]3.5 [3.0–4.0]0.436
Surgeon as the first operator26 (24)7 (16)19 (29)0.134
Total procedure time, min34 [28–45]37 [28–49]34 [26–42]0.148
Mortality at 30-d follow-up000NA
Mortality at 1-y follow-up9 (8.3)4 (9.3)5 (7.6)0.737

Values are n (%) or median [interquartile range], unless otherwise indicated.

NA, not applicable.

Missing data; arterial puncture attempts n = 92; sheath type n = 102; sheath size n = 102; MANTA vascular closure device (Teleflex Inc., Wayne, PA) flow-stop measurement n = 92; eSheath = expandable sheath; Cook = Cook Check-Flo Performer-Sheath (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN).

Procedural characteristics and post-procedural survival Values are n (%) or median [interquartile range], unless otherwise indicated. NA, not applicable. Missing data; arterial puncture attempts n = 92; sheath type n = 102; sheath size n = 102; MANTA vascular closure device (Teleflex Inc., Wayne, PA) flow-stop measurement n = 92; eSheath = expandable sheath; Cook = Cook Check-Flo Performer-Sheath (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN).

Assessment of the iliofemoral anatomy

Tortuosity index was significantly higher in the group with access-site-related vascular or bleeding complications, compared to the group without (26% [18%-33%] vs 19% [13%-29%], respectively; P = 0.012) as well as maximal angulation of the access site (50° [40°-59°] vs 43° [36°-51°], respectively; P = 0.026). Calcification index, calcium score, and minimal arterial lumen diameter across the iliofemoral system on the TAVI side were comparable between groups (Table 3). The calcium index did show a good correlation with the widely used semiquantitative calcium score (Pearson correlation: 0.818, P < 0.001; Fig. 2).
Table 3

Assessment of the transfemoral aortic valve implantation access site

Total study sampleAll patients (N = 109)Complications (n = 43)No complications (n = 66)P
Direct distance, mm183.4 ± 19.5179.8 ± 20.6185.7 ± 18.50.120
CLF distance, mm226.5 ± 23.7226.3 ± 24.2226.6 ± 23.60.948
Tortuosity index, %22 [15–31]26 [18–33]19 [12–29]0.012
Maximal angulation, °46 [38–55]50 [40–59]43 [36–51]0.026
Calcium score0.811
 None9 (8.3)3 (7.0)6 (9.1)
 Mild62 (56.0)24 (55.8)37 56.1)
 Moderate30 (27.5)11 (25.6)19 (28.8)
 Severe9 (8.3)3 (7.0)4 (6.1)
Ca volume, mm3673 [281–1141]684 [334–1176]671 [198–1121]0.564
Vessel volume, mm316,577 [13,941–20,412]16,530 [14,081–22,841]16,688 [13,727–20,090]0.480
Calcification index, %3.94 (1.62–6.86)3.47 (2.17–6.60)4.15 (1.36–6.90)0.728
MALD, mm7.0 (6.3–7.3)7.0 (6.3–7.7)6.9 (6.0–7.3)0.139

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median [interquartile range], or n (%), unless otherwise indicated. All measurements were done between the aortic bifurcation and the femoral bifurcation. In this table, only the measurements for the access-site side are reported.

Ca, calcium; MALD, minimal arterial lumen diameter across the iliofemoral system.

Tortuosity index in % = ([centerline of flow / direct distance] – 1) ∗ 100.

Calcification index in % = (Ca volume / total vessel volume) ∗ 100.

Figure 2

The relationship between the calcium score given by the researcher and the measured calcification index.

Assessment of the transfemoral aortic valve implantation access site Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median [interquartile range], or n (%), unless otherwise indicated. All measurements were done between the aortic bifurcation and the femoral bifurcation. In this table, only the measurements for the access-site side are reported. Ca, calcium; MALD, minimal arterial lumen diameter across the iliofemoral system. Tortuosity index in % = ([centerline of flow / direct distance] – 1) ∗ 100. Calcification index in % = (Ca volume / total vessel volume) ∗ 100. The relationship between the calcium score given by the researcher and the measured calcification index.

Primary and secondary clinical outcomes

In total, 43 patients (39%) had one or more primary access-sited-related vascular or bleeding complications. Ten of these patients had a major complication, 8 had a significant drop in their hemoglobin level (> 1.86 mmol/L; VARC-2 cutoff value), and 1 had a perforation at the access site. The remaining 34 patients had minor complications, hematomas or a pseudoaneurysm (Table 4).
Table 4

Access-site-related vascular and bleeding complications after MANTA vascular closure device (Teleflex Inc., Wayne, PA) closure

Major bleeding complications8 (7.3)
 Hemoglobin drop > 1.86 mmol/L8
 - Pseudoaneurysm + access-site hematoma1
 - Large access-site hematoma6
 - Small access-site hematoma1
Major vascular complications2 (1.8)
 Perforation2
 - Surgical repair2
Minor vascular complications3 (2.8)
 Pseudoaneurysm3
 - Surgical repair3
Minor bleeding complications31 (28.4)
 Access-site hematoma31
 - Pressure bandage12

Values are n, or n (%). In-hospital complications, N = 109. If one patient had more complications, only the most severe one was scored. For “hemoglobin drop,” the causes are shown; for the others, the applied treatment is shown. Hemoglobin levels were only included up to and including postoperative day 4.

Cutoff value per Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2.

Access-site-related vascular and bleeding complications after MANTA vascular closure device (Teleflex Inc., Wayne, PA) closure Values are n, or n (%). In-hospital complications, N = 109. If one patient had more complications, only the most severe one was scored. For “hemoglobin drop,” the causes are shown; for the others, the applied treatment is shown. Hemoglobin levels were only included up to and including postoperative day 4. Cutoff value per Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2. Direct arterial hemostasis was achieved in 77 patients (70.6%). Additional manual compression for over 10 minutes was necessary for 5 patients (4.6%). Pressure bandage was required in 25 patients (22.9%), and surgical intervention was required in 2 patients (1.8%). Postoperative hospitalization was longer for patients with access-site-related complications ( > 3 days: 40% vs 21%; P = 0.020). After discharge, we did not register any major access site-related vascular and bleeding complications.

Tortuosity and the risk of vascular complications

After visual assessment of their respective receiver operating characteristic curves, a cutoff value of 49.5 degrees was chosen for the maximal angulation (sensitivity 57%; specificity 70%), and 22.8% was chosen for the tortuosity index (sensitivity 62%; specificity 61%). Univariable binary regression analysis showed that only maximal angulation and tortuosity index could have had a significant effect on TAVI access-site related vascular and bleeding complications (major and minor), with odds ratios (ORs) of 3.4 (P = 0.005) and 2.8 (P = 0.012), respectively. The effect of other, traditional risk factors remained insignificant (Supplemental Table S1) We added the combination of these variables (high tortuosity index, high degree of angulation, or both), together with an echo-guided puncture, to an age- and gender-adjusted multivariable model. Patients with both high angulation and significant tortuosity had an increased risk for access-site-related vascular complications (OR 4.7, confidence interval [1.65-13.20]; P = 0.004; Supplemental Table S2) Although the event rate of major complications was relatively low, the same angulation cutoff proved to be a predictor of major complications as well (P = 0.017; OR 7, confidence interval [1.4-34.8]).

Discussion

This prospective single-centre study identified arterial tortuosity, elongation, and especially angulation of the iliofemoral arteries as important predictors of access-site-related vascular and bleeding complications in TF TAVI procedures using the MANTA closure device. Also, our results indicate that routine, semi-objective screening of preoperative computed tomography scans cannot prevent all tortuosity-related bleeding complications. The incidence of major vascular and bleeding complications and unplanned vascular repairs has decreased within the intermediate- and lower-risk population, compared to that in the first high-risk TAVI trials. Yet, both our data and the available literature show that these events still affect short- and long-term outcomes in up to 4%-7.5% of the TAVI population.,,(p3),, The incidence of major vascular and bleeding events in our cohort matches the aforementioned historical data, although we observed more minor complications than most other groups reporting on minor events (∼3%-30%).8, 9, 10, A plausible explanation for this difference could be our close and prospective monitoring of events and the slight differences in definitions. Proper preprocedural planning, taking patient- and device-related factors into account, is crucial to minimalize the incidence of periprocedural bleeding and vascular complications. The interaction of anatomy and closure devices is especially interesting, as these devices have unique learning curves, usability, and applicability. To these ends, several predictors of adverse events have been proposed., Circumferential calcification and sheath-to-femoral artery ratio, are widely known predictors, and recent publications suggest that off-target puncture, unfavourable arteriotomy phenotype, small artery diameter, left femoral access, and female gender all increased the risk of vascular-closure-device-related vascular complications., In our cohort, left femoral access use was negligible, and data on circumferential calcification were not available. We did determine a normalized iliofemoral calcification index, but this showed no relationship with the registered complications. Our preprocedural screening takes circumferential calcifications and arterial diameters, and the artery-sheath ratio, into account, and this selection bias probably diminished their effect on our study population. Our most important and novel finding is the unfavourable influence of arterial elongation, measured by the tortuosity index and angulation, on the efficacy of a plug-based vascular closure device (MANTA). We have shown that a tortuosity index of 22.8 and an angle > 49.5 are important and synergistic predictors of VARC-2 vascular and bleeding complications. These findings connect well to the findings of Mach et al., who published similar findings (a tortuosity score of 21.2) in a population treated with suture-based closure devices and clinical experience with endovascular aneurysm repair.,, A possible explanation could be the distortion of tortuous vessels, caused by the guidewire and temporary placement of the intravascular parts of the closure devices. This possibility may explain our findings of local bleeding complications and the need for additional manipulations to achieve complete hemostasis (30% of our patients). We believe that objective tortuosity measurements should be incorporated into the preprocedural screening process to improve procedural outcomes. Both measurements could help with closure-device selection and in predicting access-site-related vascular and bleeding complications, although further studies are warranted to determine and validate the most relevant cutoff values.

Strengths and limitations

The strength of the study was its prospective design, with predefined access-site evaluation immediately after and during hospitalization. Patients were treated with one type of closure device. Access-site assessment was scored by the ward doctors. We faced a limited follow-up after hospital discharge due to pandemic measurements (COVID-19)—from March 2020 onward, patients could not be physically present in the outpatient clinic for the 6-week follow-up appointment and instead received a telephone consultation. Some of the vascular complications (eg, pseudoaneurysms) may have been missed, as no routine echocardiographic control of the access site was performed. No information is available on circumferential calcifications. Due to the small sample size, information on the influence of complications or other procedural factors on patient survival remains limited.

Conclusion

Steep angles and greater elongation, as measured by the tortuosity index of the iliofemoral tract, increase the risk of vascular and bleeding complications after utilization of plug-based closure devices in TAVI patients. Integrating these measurements into the TAVI workup could help improve TAVI outcomes.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Elliot L Chaikof; Mark F Fillinger; Jon S Matsumura; Robert B Rutherford; Geoffrey H White; Jan D Blankensteijn; Victor M Bernhard; Peter L Harris; K Craig Kent; James May; Frank J Veith; Christopher K Zarins
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.

Authors:  Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Frequency and Effect of Access-Related Vascular Injury and Subsequent Vascular Intervention After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Ditte Dencker; Mikkel Taudorf; N H Vincent Luk; Michael B Nielsen; Klaus F Kofoed; Torben V Schroeder; Lars Søndergaard; Lars Lönn; Ole De Backer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Accuracy of device landing zone calcium volume measurement with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Won-Keun Kim; Matthias Renker; Andreas Rolf; Christoph Liebetrau; Arnaud Van Linden; Mani Arsalan; Mirko Doss; Julian Rieck; Maksymilian P Opolski; Helge Möllmann; Thomas Walther; Christian W Hamm
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Femoral Versus Nonfemoral Peripheral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Sylvain Beurtheret; Nicole Karam; Noemie Resseguier; Remi Houel; Thomas Modine; Thierry Folliguet; Chekrallah Chamandi; Olivier Com; Richard Gelisse; Jacques Bille; Patrick Joly; Nicolas Barra; Alain Tavildari; Philippe Commeau; Sebastien Armero; Mathieu Pankert; Michel Pansieri; Sabrina Siame; René Koning; Marc Laskar; Yvan Le Dolley; Arnaud Maudiere; Bertrand Villette; Patrick Khanoyan; Julien Seitz; Didier Blanchard; Christian Spaulding; Thierry Lefevre; Eric Van Belle; Martine Gilard; Helene Eltchaninoff; Bernard Iung; Jean Philippe Verhoye; Ramzi Abi-Akar; Paul Achouh; Thomas Cuisset; Pascal Leprince; Eloi Marijon; Hervé Le Breton; Antoine Lafont
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

Authors:  A Pieter Kappetein; Stuart J Head; Philippe Généreux; Nicolo Piazza; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Eugene H Blackstone; Thomas G Brott; David J Cohen; Donald E Cutlip; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Rebecca T Hahn; Ajay J Kirtane; Mitchell W Krucoff; Susheel Kodali; Michael J Mack; Roxana Mehran; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Pascal Vranckx; John G Webb; Stephan Windecker; Patrick W Serruys; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  A novel method to estimate iliac tortuosity in evaluating EVAR access.

Authors:  Thorarinn Kristmundsson; Björn Sonesson; Timothy Resch
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) trial.

Authors:  Philippe Généreux; John G Webb; Lars G Svensson; Susheel K Kodali; Lowell F Satler; William F Fearon; Charles J Davidson; Andrew C Eisenhauer; Raj R Makkar; Geoffrey W Bergman; Vasilis Babaliaros; Joseph E Bavaria; Omaida C Velazquez; Mathew R Williams; Irene Hueter; Ke Xu; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Predictors of clinical outcome in transfemoral TAVI: circumferential iliofemoral calcifications and manufacturer-derived recommendations.

Authors:  Markus Reinthaler; Sunil K Aggarwal; Rodney De Palma; Ulf Landmesser; Georg Froehlich; John Yap; Pascal Meier; Michael J Mullen
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 1.596

10.  Frequency, Impact, and Predictors of Access Complications With Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rutger-Jan Nuis; David Wood; Herbert Kroon; Maarten van Wiechen; Darra Bigelow; Chris Buller; Joost Daemen; Peter de Jaegere; Zvonimir Krajcer; John Webb; Nicolas Van Mieghem
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2021-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.