| Literature DB >> 35864447 |
Cuiling Wu1,2,3, Jianying Li4, Xinming Xu3, Qi Xu4, Chongkai Qin5, Guifen Liu1, Chen Wei1, Guoping Zhang2, Kechuan Tian6, Xuefeng Fu7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cashmere goats are a heterogeneous hairy mammal. The fineness of cashmere can affect its economic value. Therefore, in this study, we used transcriptome sequencing techniques to analyze the gene expression profiles of the skin tissues of cashmere goats with different cashmere fineness. The selected candidate genes were functionally verified with the secondary hair follicle hair papillary cells of cashmere goats.Entities:
Keywords: Cashmere fineness; Dermal papilla cells; FA2H; Jiangnan cashmere goats
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35864447 PMCID: PMC9306159 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08763-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 4.547
Summary of individual information and fiber diameter measurement results of experimental goats
| Sample Number | Sample Name | Date of birth | Weight/kg | MFD/μm | FDSD | CVFD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 198,060 | Fe-1 | 2019/3/6 | 28.50 | 13.40 | 3.22 | 20.35 |
| 190,002 | Fe-2 | 2019/3/4 | 28.80 | 13.56 | 3.01 | 20.89 |
| 198,414 | Fe-3 | 2019/2/28 | 26.50 | 13.77 | 3.28 | 20.39 |
| 195,760 | Fe-4 | 2019/2/24 | 27.40 | 13.84 | 3.48 | 19.95 |
| Mean | Fe | - | 27.80 ± 0.53a | 13.64 ± 0.10a | 3.25 ± 0.10a | 20.40 ± 0.19a |
| 198,125 | Ce-1 | 2019/2/26 | 26.80 | 15.14 | 3.55 | 20.13 |
| 198,412 | Ce-2 | 2019/2/28 | 28.50 | 15.32 | 3.29 | 19.92 |
| 199,462 | Ce-3 | 2019/3/10 | 28.00 | 15.58 | 3.33 | 20.34 |
| 198,619 | Ce-4 | 2019/3/3 | 27.50 | 15.18 | 3.46 | 20.11 |
| Mean | Ce | - | 27.70 ± 0.36a | 15.31 ± 0.10b | 3.41 ± 0.06a | 20.13 ± 0.09a |
Note: MFD stands for mean fiber diameter, FDSD represents mean fiber diameter standard deviation, CVFD represents coefficient of variation in fiber diameter. Data in the same column with different lowercase letters on the shoulder show significant differences (P < 0.05), while the same letters on the shoulder indicate no significant difference (P > 0.05)
Fig. 1Analysis of DEGs. A. Volcano map; B. Heatmap
Fig. 2Bubble plots of GO and KEGG enrichment analysis. A. Biological process; B. Cellular process; C. Molecular function; D. KEGG pathway analysis
Fig. 3Functional network diagram of DEGs
Fig. 4Protein interaction networks of DEGs
Fig. 5Verification of FA2H expression level. A. Validation of mRNAs by qRT-PCR; B. Expression levels of the FA2H gene in the skin tissue of secondary hair follicles at different stages. C. FA2H immunofluorescence of DPCs in cashmere goats
Fig. 6Detection of FA2H expression levels in DPCs after treatment. "Blank" represents the untreated control group; si-NC represents the FA2H gene interference control group. si-444, si-594, and si-771 represent the FA2H gene interference treatment groups, respectively; FA2H-NC represents the FA2H gene overexpression control group; pCDNA3.1( +)-FA2H represents the FA2H gene overexpression treatment group. Data are the mean ± SEM, and statistical analysis was performed using a T-test. * represents a significant difference, p < 0.05, ** represents a very significant difference, p < 0.01
Fig. 7The effect of the FA2H gene on the DPCs of cashmere goats. A. Cell activity detection; B. Cell proliferation detection; C, D. Cell cycle detection; E. Gene expression after FA2H overexpression in DPC; Data are the mean ± SEM, and statistical analysis was performed using a T-test. * represents a significant difference, p < 0.05, ** represents a very significant difference, p < 0.01