| Literature DB >> 35864389 |
Muzaffar Iqbal1, Junhai Ma2, Navieed Ahmad3, Kramat Hussain2, Muhammad Waqas4, Yanjie Liang2.
Abstract
Reducing energy usage and promoting energy management practices remain hot issues in the construction sector. Construction firms are not interested to adopt energy conservation and management practices in their projects. Despite the successful integration of energy management practices in developed nations, their adaptability in developing countries, especially in Pakistan, is at a slow pace. Therefore, drivers to energy management practices need to be realized for its adoption. Based on this, the current study intends to evaluate the drivers of energy management practices adopted in the construction sector of Pakistan by using a four-stage methodology. Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM), interpretive structural modeling (ISM), and Matrice d'Impacts Croises Multiplication Appliques a un Classement (MICMAC) analysis were integrated with prioritizing essential drivers. Increased tax imposition on construction companies for energy usage and pollution contribution, promotion of investment subsidies for energy efficiency technologies, and increased enforcement of government rules and regulations regarding on-site energy management practices arose as significant drivers to adoption of energy management practices in the construction sector of Pakistan. These results will be helpful for policymakers to develop effective policies for integrating energy management practices in the construction sector. This study contributes significantly by developing a novel model of drivers affecting EMP adoption in the Pakistani construction sector. Further research might be expanded to other developing countries to validate current results.Entities:
Keywords: Construction sector; Developing country; Drivers; Energy management; Interpretive structural modeling; Sustainability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35864389 PMCID: PMC9302223 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21928-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 5.190
National and international policies for EMPs
| Policy instrument | Description |
|---|---|
| United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) | The UNIDO plays a vital role in protecting the natural environment. The basic purpose of this organization is to improve the natural environment through the adoption of green energy and renewable energy sources, also promoting energy-efficient technologies in the industry like the construction sector to mitigate the carbon footprints |
| Energy Efficiency and Capacity (EEC) | USAID has funded this project for 3 years. The primary purpose of this project is to promote energy conservation and implementation of EMPs for the contribution to the national economy |
| GIZ Renewable Energy-Energy Efficiency (RE-EE) Project | This project has been designed to assist the government of Pakistan regarding the EMPs in the manufacturing and construction industries. |
| NEECA | The NEECA project was introduced in 1985 through the help of USAID. The primary purpose of this project is to design energy conservation policies for those industries which consume a large amount of energy and produce carbon. In Pakistan, the construction, manufacturing, and transport sectors are the main contributors to consume energy |
| Energy Standards & Labeling Scheme (ESLS) | GEF funds the (ESLS) project; this project aims to promote EMPs through energy-efficient equipment for the sake of energy saving and mitigation of carbon emission |
| National Productivity Organization (NPO) | ENERCON and NPO outsource an organization known as Building Energy Audit (BEA). The purpose of this project is to conduct an audit of government commercial and non-commercial buildings regarding the adoption of energy-saving activities. |
| Energy Efficiency Management Project (EEMP) | This project was introduced to design plans for implementing EMPs in different industries such as the construction sector and manufacturing sector, with coordination of the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). |
| Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) | JICA’s primary purpose is to enhance the energy-efficient technologies and EMPs in Pakistan with the help of ENERCON. |
| Energy Conservation Building Codes (ECBC) | NEECA and the government of Pakistan introduced an act in 2015 for energy conservation and established codes for energy-efficient buildings. This initiative was taken under the Energy Conservation Act 2015, section 13. |
Fig. 1A step-by-step approach to identify drivers for EMPs adoption
Fig. 2Filtering suitable drivers through FDM’s experts’ ranking
Fig. 3The process of establishing and converting SSIM into IRM and FRM
SSIM
| Sr. | Drivers | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Increased efficiency in construction processes and management practices | V | V | V | A | V | V | V | V | A | O | V | A | A | A | V | A | V | A | |
| 2 | Contribute towards national economic growth and more job opportunities | V | V | V | V | V | V | O | V | V | V | A | O | O | V | V | O | O | ||
| 3 | Availability of new energy-saving solutions, innovative technology, and tools in the local market | A | A | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | A | O | A | A | V | X | |||
| 4 | Increased tax imposition on construction companies for energy usage and pollution contribution | V | O | V | O | V | V | V | V | V | V | O | V | V | O | O | ||||
| 5 | Promotion of investment subsidies for energy efficiency technologies | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | O | V | V | V | V | |||||
| 6 | Decreased price levels of energy-saving technology for the construction industry | V | V | V | A | A | V | O | A | O | A | O | O | O | ||||||
| 7 | Aligned with the smart business and international energy-saving trend | V | X | X | A | V | V | V | O | V | A | O | A | |||||||
| 8 | Gained competitive advantage | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | O | O | O | ||||||||
| 9 | Recognition of energy-saving buildings as Productivity assets | V | O | V | V | V | O | V | A | V | O | |||||||||
| 10 | Reduced use of construction materials in the economy | A | V | V | A | O | A | A | V | A | ||||||||||
| 11 | Lower maintenance cost | V | O | O | O | A | O | O | O | |||||||||||
| 12 | Facilitating a culture of best practice sharing | O | V | V | A | O | O | O | ||||||||||||
| 13 | Reduced carbon emissions and environmental pollution | V | O | A | A | V | O | |||||||||||||
| 14 | Increased education level and awareness of contractors’ employees regarding EMP issues | O | V | V | O | X | ||||||||||||||
| 15 | Development of database related to the successful adoption of EMPs in construction projects | V | V | O | O | |||||||||||||||
| 16 | Promotion of sustainable long-term energy management strategic plans | A | V | V | ||||||||||||||||
| 17 | Increased enforcement of government rules and regulations regarding on-site EMPs | V | V | |||||||||||||||||
| 18 | Enhanced occupants’ health, safety, and comfort | O | ||||||||||||||||||
| 19 | Availability of skilled and technical EMPs experts |
Fig. 4Diagraph of EMP drivers
Fig. 5ISM-based model of drivers to EMP adoption
Fig. 6MICMAC analysis of drivers to EMP adoption
Fig. 7Relationship between clusters of drivers
Fig. 8Representation of EMP driver for promoting sustainability