Kelley Covington Wood1, Mary Hidde2,3, Tiffany Kendig2, Mackenzi Pergolotti2,4,5. 1. ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA. kecwood@selectmedical.com. 2. ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA. 3. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 4. Department of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 5. Department of Occupational Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact and acceptability of outpatient physical or occupational therapy (PT/OT) for breast cancer survivors (BCS) with varying levels of upper extremity disability (UED). METHODS: We retrospectively extracted patient and therapy characteristics, UED measured by quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH, 0-100 pts.), and patient-rated acceptability (1-item, 0-10 pts) from rehabilitation charts of BCS who completed cancer-specialized PT/OT provided by a single national institution in 2019. We summarized characteristics and acceptability using descriptive statistics, then used established parameters to group BCS by baseline UED severity: high- (QuickDASH > 31.5), moderate- (QuickDASH = 18.5-31.5), or low-UED (QuickDASH = 13-18.5). To evaluate within-group pre-to-post QuickDASH change, we used paired samples t test (p < 0.01), then calculated the proportion who achieved the minimally clinical important difference (MCID, 15.9 points). To compare between-groups difference in QuickDASH improvement, we used Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Patients (N = 417) were 59.89 ± 12.06 years old, 99% female, and attended approximately 10 PT/OT sessions (IQR = 6.0-16.0). Most had high baseline UED (62%), followed by moderate (25%) or low UED (13%). For each severity group, mean pre-to-post change in QuickDASH was significant: high-UED (M∆ = 25.13 ± 20.33, d = 1.24, p < 0.01), moderate-UED (M∆ = 11.36 ± 11.9, d = 0.95, p < 0.01), and low-UED (M∆ = 4.84 ± 9.15, d = 0.53, p < 0.01). Most with high UED achieved the MCID (n = 176, 68.2%). In the moderate- and low-UED groups 44% (n = 46) and 4% (n = 2) achieved the MCID, respectively. Acceptability was high (n = 167, Median = 10). CONCLUSION: Outpatient cancer rehabilitation is associated with significant improvement in UED for BCS and was acceptable to patients regardless of UED severity at baseline.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact and acceptability of outpatient physical or occupational therapy (PT/OT) for breast cancer survivors (BCS) with varying levels of upper extremity disability (UED). METHODS: We retrospectively extracted patient and therapy characteristics, UED measured by quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH, 0-100 pts.), and patient-rated acceptability (1-item, 0-10 pts) from rehabilitation charts of BCS who completed cancer-specialized PT/OT provided by a single national institution in 2019. We summarized characteristics and acceptability using descriptive statistics, then used established parameters to group BCS by baseline UED severity: high- (QuickDASH > 31.5), moderate- (QuickDASH = 18.5-31.5), or low-UED (QuickDASH = 13-18.5). To evaluate within-group pre-to-post QuickDASH change, we used paired samples t test (p < 0.01), then calculated the proportion who achieved the minimally clinical important difference (MCID, 15.9 points). To compare between-groups difference in QuickDASH improvement, we used Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Patients (N = 417) were 59.89 ± 12.06 years old, 99% female, and attended approximately 10 PT/OT sessions (IQR = 6.0-16.0). Most had high baseline UED (62%), followed by moderate (25%) or low UED (13%). For each severity group, mean pre-to-post change in QuickDASH was significant: high-UED (M∆ = 25.13 ± 20.33, d = 1.24, p < 0.01), moderate-UED (M∆ = 11.36 ± 11.9, d = 0.95, p < 0.01), and low-UED (M∆ = 4.84 ± 9.15, d = 0.53, p < 0.01). Most with high UED achieved the MCID (n = 176, 68.2%). In the moderate- and low-UED groups 44% (n = 46) and 4% (n = 2) achieved the MCID, respectively. Acceptability was high (n = 167, Median = 10). CONCLUSION: Outpatient cancer rehabilitation is associated with significant improvement in UED for BCS and was acceptable to patients regardless of UED severity at baseline.
Authors: Mackenzi Pergolotti; Catherine M Alfano; Alison N Cernich; K Robin Yabroff; Peter R Manning; Janet S de Moor; Erin E Hahn; Andrea L Cheville; Supriya G Mohile Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: An De Groef; Marijke Van Kampen; Evi Dieltjens; Marie-Rose Christiaens; Patrick Neven; Inge Geraerts; Nele Devoogdt Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jan J Kootstra; Pieter U Dijkstra; Hans Rietman; Jaap de Vries; Peter Baas; Jan H B Geertzen; Harald J Hoekstra; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Carolyn D Runowicz; Corinne R Leach; N Lynn Henry; Karen S Henry; Heather T Mackey; Rebecca L Cowens-Alvarado; Rachel S Cannady; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Stephen B Edge; Linda A Jacobs; Arti Hurria; Lawrence B Marks; Samuel J LaMonte; Ellen Warner; Gary H Lyman; Patricia A Ganz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Danielle Riley; Elena Letuchy; Linda Koehler; Joan Neuner; Cheryl Jernigan; Brian Gryzlak; Neil Segal; Bradley McDowell; Brian Smith; Sonia L Sugg; Jane M Armer; Ingrid M Lizarraga Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-03-09 Impact factor: 4.872