A Baroncini1,2, F Migliorini3, J Eschweiler3, F Hildebrand3, P Trobisch4. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. alice.baroncini@gmail.com. 2. Department of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany. alice.baroncini@gmail.com. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. 4. Department of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tether breakage is a frequent mechanical complications after vertebral body tethering (VBT), but not all patients with a breakage show loss of correction. The reason of this clinical finding has not yet been clarified. We hypothesized that the integrity of the tether is relevant only in the early stages after VBT, when it drives growth modulation and tissue remodelling. After these mechanisms have taken place, the tether loses its function and a breakage will not alter the new shape of the spine. Thus, tether breakage would have a greater clinical relevance when occurring shortly after surgery. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent VBT and had a min. 2-year follow-up were included. The difference in curve magnitude between the 1st standing x-ray and the last follow-up was calculated (ΔCobb). For each curve, the presence and timing of tether breakage were recorded. The curves were grouped according to if and when the breakage was observed (no breakage, breakage at 0-6 months, 6-12 months, > 12 months). The ΔCobb was compared among these groups with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Data from 152 curves were available: 68 with no breakage, 12 with a breakage at 0-6 months, 37 at 6-12 months and 35 > 12 months. The ANOVA found significant difference in the ΔCobb among the groups (Sum of square 2553.59; degree of freedom 3; mean of square 851.1; Fisher test 13.8; P < 0.0001). Patients with no breakage or breakage at > 12 months had similar ΔCobb (mean 4.8° and 7.8°, respectively, P = 0.3), smaller than the 0-6 or 6-12 groups (15.8° and 13.8°, respectively). CONCLUSION: Tether breakage leads to a consistent loss of correction when occurring within the first 12 months, while it has limited clinical relevance when occurring later on.
INTRODUCTION: Tether breakage is a frequent mechanical complications after vertebral body tethering (VBT), but not all patients with a breakage show loss of correction. The reason of this clinical finding has not yet been clarified. We hypothesized that the integrity of the tether is relevant only in the early stages after VBT, when it drives growth modulation and tissue remodelling. After these mechanisms have taken place, the tether loses its function and a breakage will not alter the new shape of the spine. Thus, tether breakage would have a greater clinical relevance when occurring shortly after surgery. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent VBT and had a min. 2-year follow-up were included. The difference in curve magnitude between the 1st standing x-ray and the last follow-up was calculated (ΔCobb). For each curve, the presence and timing of tether breakage were recorded. The curves were grouped according to if and when the breakage was observed (no breakage, breakage at 0-6 months, 6-12 months, > 12 months). The ΔCobb was compared among these groups with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Data from 152 curves were available: 68 with no breakage, 12 with a breakage at 0-6 months, 37 at 6-12 months and 35 > 12 months. The ANOVA found significant difference in the ΔCobb among the groups (Sum of square 2553.59; degree of freedom 3; mean of square 851.1; Fisher test 13.8; P < 0.0001). Patients with no breakage or breakage at > 12 months had similar ΔCobb (mean 4.8° and 7.8°, respectively, P = 0.3), smaller than the 0-6 or 6-12 groups (15.8° and 13.8°, respectively). CONCLUSION: Tether breakage leads to a consistent loss of correction when occurring within the first 12 months, while it has limited clinical relevance when occurring later on.
Authors: Alice Baroncini; Aurelien Courvoisier; Pedro Berjano; Filippo Migliorini; Jörg Eschweiler; Philipp Kobbe; Frank Hildebrand; Per David Trobisch Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Daniel G Hoernschemeyer; Melanie E Boeyer; Nicole M Tweedy; John R Worley; Julia R Crim Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Daniel Alsoof; Christopher L McDonald; Matthew Kovoor; Bassel G Diebo; Eren O Kuris; Valentin Antoci; Alan H Daniels Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2022-08-03
Authors: Alice Baroncini; Per David Trobisch; Christof Birkenmaier; Stephanie Da Paz; Filippo Migliorini Journal: Z Orthop Unfall Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 1.108
Authors: Alice Baroncini; Per David Trobisch; Angelika Berrer; Philipp Kobbe; Markus Tingart; Jörg Eschweiler; Stephanie Da Paz; Filippo Migliorini Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-02-27 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Paul R P Rushton; Luigi Nasto; Stefan Parent; Isabelle Turgeon; Sultan Aldebeyan; Firoz Miyanji Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 3.468