Literature DB >> 35863849

Blood Hyperviscosity: A Novel Link Between Hyperinflammation and Hypercoagulability in COVID-19.

Aldo Bonaventura1, Nicola Potere2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; blood viscosity; coagulation; immunothrombosis; inflammation; thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35863849      PMCID: PMC9535031          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   27.203


× No keyword cloud information.
Originally regarded to as a mere respiratory illness, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by dysregulated immune response and abnormal cytokine release affecting multiple organs including blood and the vasculature. As part of an evolutionarily conserved, first-line defense mechanism known as immunothrombosis, the innate immune system interacts with platelets and the endothelium and triggers the coagulation system, thus enabling confinement of invading pathogens. However, excessive immunothrombosis in response to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) may result in pathological thrombosis (macro- and microvascular), which accounts for substantial organ injury and mortality. , Despite current thromboprophylaxis approaches, a not negligible portion of patients experiences thrombotic events, thereby implicating the existence of knowledge and therapeutic gaps. Researchers worldwide have attempted to identify early disease predictors, largely focusing on circulating biomarkers. Nevertheless, very few studies to date have investigated the changes induced by COVID-19 on blood rheology.6, 7, 8 One of the main hemorheological properties is whole blood viscosity (WBV). Major determinants of WBV are hematocrit, plasma viscosity, and erythrocyte aggregation and deformability. As WBV is influenced by shear rate, high- and low-shear BV refer as to areas of the blood vessel at high- and low-shear flow, respectively. The former is generally characterized by laminar blood flow and contributes to erythrocyte aggregation and microvascular ischemia, whereas the latter is generally characterized by turbulent blood flow inducing endothelial damage to the vessel wall. In this issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Choi et al have provided several elements of innovation by exploring the prognostic value of estimated BV (eBV) to predict mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, eBV (calculated according to Walburn-Schneck model) was measured in 5,621 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and found to positively correlate with in-hospital mortality. This association, which was stronger for estimated high-shear BV (eHSBV) than for estimated low-shear BV (eLSBV), was overall consistent across major patient subgroups (including age, sex, comorbidities, disease severity upon admission, concomitant antithrombotic therapies, and proinflammatory markers). Patients with higher eHSBV and eLSBV exhibited reduced survival rates. In particular, when compared with patients with eHSBV within the lowest quartile, those with highest eHSBV values exhibited a 50-fold higher risk of death (adjusted HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.27-1.84). Consistently, COVID-19 patients with highest values of eLSBV were at higher risk of death (aHR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.14-1.64). Hyperinflammation may promote hyperviscosity through multiple mechanisms, including enhanced concentration of large proinflammatory and procoagulant proteins (eg, acute-phase proteins, such as fibrinogen). , Indeed, they increase plasma viscosity, a component of WBV, and may electrostatically interfere with physiological viscoelastic properties of erythrocytes, which also affect WBV. In line with previous observations, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were associated with poor survival in this study. However, eHSBV retained its predictive value even after adjustment for proinflammatory biomarkers, thereby suggesting that hyperviscosity, although mechanistically related to hyperinflammation, may represent an additional, yet at least in part independent, predictor of adverse outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. This notion was further supported by the strong correlation observed between eBV and mortality in the stratum of patients with no concomitant cardiovascular or metabolic diseases, in whom risk stratification may be particularly challenging. While still requiring adequate—both external and prospective—validation, eBV is likely to represent an attractive biomarker, as it was shown to be an early and robust predictor of mortality, and it is widely available and relatively inexpensive. In light of the translational potential associated with eBV, further investigation is eagerly warranted to confirm and expand the present findings, in order to advance eBV into the clinical scenario. It is, however, worth considering that eBV represents an indirect approximation of BV, which may not reflect BV as directly measured by viscometers. Hence, further research should be addressed to implement hemorheological models, and to establish the precise relationship between estimated and direct BV measurement. The study by Choi et al also showed no association between WBW and in-hospital mortality in participants of Asian ethnicity, which opens to the possibility that genetic factors may influence COVID-19–related outcomes through differential hemorheological responses to SARS-CoV-2. The impact of distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants and vaccines on blood viscosity still remains to be elucidated. In a small study, eBV increased after vaccination in both patients with and without previous COVID-19, but especially among those with prior symptomatic disease; however, it should be acknowledged that no clear information about the model used for estimation is provided. Although preliminary, these observations suggest that screening for previous COVID-19 before vaccination might potentially have a role in preventing vaccine-related thrombotic complications. Moreover, different therapeutic strategies targeting hyperinflammation (eg, glucocorticoids, interleukin-6 receptor blockers, Janus kinase inhibitors, interleukin-1 inhibitors) or hypercoagulability (eg, anticoagulants, statins, antiplatelet agents) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 may exert peculiar effects on BV, which have not been unraveled yet. Following the introduction of novel antiviral agents for COVID-19 to be administered especially in the community setting, refining risk stratification strategies to identify subjects with COVID-19 at elevated risk for disease progression is of utmost importance. The assessment of the prognostic role of eBV in the larger population of COVID-19 outpatients shall therefore be desirable. While it has been reported that hyperviscosity may increase the risk of developing thrombotic events in critically ill patients with COVID-19, a clear, direct link between the proposed mechanism (ie, hyperviscosity) and the putative ensuing clinical event (ie, thrombosis) is still lacking. Yet, it is not possible to exclude that hyperviscosity may contribute to increase in-hospital mortality through multiple mechanisms other than hypercoagulability. Accumulating evidence indicates that COVID-19 can become a chronic disease, “long COVID,” in some patients, and the increased thrombotic risk may persist long after the acute phase. , Hence, a potential extension of the present findings, currently restricted to the hospitalization period, may involve exploring the postdischarge period. This would allow to identify patients at risk for postdischarge thrombosis who might therefore benefit from extended-duration thromboprophylaxis. Despite the limitations inherent to the present study, including the retrospective design, the approximate nature of the estimation of BV, and the limited discriminative power of eBV for clinical decision making when used on top of available clinical data, the study by Choi et al identified blood viscosity as a trackable biomarker that may play a previously neglected role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. BV may also represent a novel therapeutic target in COVID-19, which certainly deserves additional attention, and it could generate relevant therapeutic implications for, but not limited to, COVID-19.

Funding Support and Author Disclosures

Dr Bonaventura has received a travel grant from Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Ltd to attend the 2019 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions; and has recevied honoraria from Effetti s.r.l. (Milan, Italy) to collaborate on a medical website Inflammology. Dr Potere has received a training fellowship from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
  15 in total

Review 1.  The clinical significance of whole blood viscosity in (cardio)vascular medicine.

Authors:  G A M Pop; D J Duncker; M Gardien; P Vranckx; S Versluis; D Hasan; C J Slager
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Hypercoagulability of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A report of thromboelastography findings and other parameters of hemostasis.

Authors:  Mauro Panigada; Nicola Bottino; Paola Tagliabue; Giacomo Grasselli; Cristina Novembrino; Veena Chantarangkul; Antonio Pesenti; Flora Peyvandi; Armando Tripodi
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  Increased blood viscosity and red blood cell aggregation in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Elie Nader; Christophe Nougier; Camille Boisson; Solene Poutrel; Judith Catella; Fiona Martin; Juliette Charvet; Sandrine Girard; Salomé Havard-Guibert; Marie Martin; Hamdi Rezigue; Helene Desmurs-Clavel; Céline Renoux; Philippe Joly; Nicolas Guillot; Yves Bertrand; Arnaud Hot; Yesim Dargaud; Philippe Connes
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Association of Blood Viscosity With Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.

Authors:  Daein Choi; Ori Waksman; Aleesha Shaik; Phyu Mar; Qinzhong Chen; Daniel J Cho; HyoungSup Kim; Robin L Smith; Sascha N Goonewardena; Robert S Rosenson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 27.203

Review 5.  Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity.

Authors:  Bernd Engelmann; Steffen Massberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 6.  Endothelial dysfunction and immunothrombosis as key pathogenic mechanisms in COVID-19.

Authors:  Aldo Bonaventura; Alessandra Vecchié; Lorenzo Dagna; Kimberly Martinod; Dave L Dixon; Benjamin W Van Tassell; Francesco Dentali; Fabrizio Montecucco; Steffen Massberg; Marcel Levi; Antonio Abbate
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 53.106

7.  COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity: a link between inflammation and thrombophilia?

Authors:  Cheryl L Maier; Alexander D Truong; Sara C Auld; Derek M Polly; Christin-Lauren Tanksley; Alexander Duncan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Hemostatic alterations in COVID-19.

Authors:  Flora Peyvandi; Andrea Artoni; Cristina Novembrino; Stefano Aliberti; Mauro Panigada; Marco Boscarino; Roberta Gualtierotti; Federica Rossi; Roberta Palla; Ida Martinelli; Giacomo Grasselli; Francesco Blasi; Armando Tripodi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 9.  Emerging evidence of a COVID-19 thrombotic syndrome has treatment implications.

Authors:  Joan T Merrill; Doruk Erkan; Jerald Winakur; Judith A James
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 20.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.