Christopher E Knoepke1,2, Bonnie Siry-Bove3, Caitlin Mayton4, Abigail Latimer5, Jan Hart6, Larry A Allen1,2, Stacie L Daugherty1,2,7, Colleen K McIlvennan1, Daniel D Matlock8, Prateeti Khazanie1. 1. Division of Cardiology (C.E.K., L.A.A., S.L.D., C.K.M., P.K.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. 2. Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (C.E.K., L.A.A., S.L.D.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine (B.S.-B.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. 4. School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (C.M.). 5. College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington (A.L.). 6. Ascension St. Vincent Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN (J.H.). 7. Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora (S.L.D.). 8. Division of Geriatric Medicine (D.D.M.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) evaluation includes a psychosocial assessment, conducted by social workers (SWs) on the advanced heart failure multidisciplinary team. Postdischarge caregiving plans are central to psychosocial evaluation. Caregiving's relationship with LVAD outcomes is mixed, and testing patients' social resources may disadvantage those from historically undertreated groups. We describe variation in policies defining adequate caregiving plans post-LVAD implant and possible impacts on patients from marginalized groups. METHODS: This was a 2-phase sequential mixed-methods study: (1) phase 1, survey of US-based LVAD SWs, describing assessment structure and policies guiding candidacy outcomes; and (2) phase 2, individual interviews with SWs to further describe how caregiving plan adequacy impacts LVAD candidacy. RESULTS: Sixty-seven SWs returned surveys (rr=47%) from unique programs. Caregiving plan inadequacy (n=30) was the most common psychosocial dealbreaker. When asked what duration of caregiving is required, 23% indicated ≥3 months, 27% 4 to 12 weeks, and 30% <4 weeks. Two reported no duration requirement, 6 stated an indefinite 24/7 commitment was necessary. Across 22 interviews, SWs mirrored that caregiving plans were the most common psychosocial contraindication. How caregiving is operationalized varied. Participants voiced a tension between extended caregiving improving outcomes and the sense that some people of color, women, or low socioeconomic status patients struggle to meet stringent requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Policies regarding adequate duration of 24/7 caregiving vary, but inadequate caregiving plans are the most common psychosocial contraindication. Participants worry about patients' ability to meet restrictive requirements, particularly from historically undertreated groups. This highlights a need to operationalize quality caregiving, standardize assessment, and support medically appropriate patients with strained social resources.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) evaluation includes a psychosocial assessment, conducted by social workers (SWs) on the advanced heart failure multidisciplinary team. Postdischarge caregiving plans are central to psychosocial evaluation. Caregiving's relationship with LVAD outcomes is mixed, and testing patients' social resources may disadvantage those from historically undertreated groups. We describe variation in policies defining adequate caregiving plans post-LVAD implant and possible impacts on patients from marginalized groups. METHODS: This was a 2-phase sequential mixed-methods study: (1) phase 1, survey of US-based LVAD SWs, describing assessment structure and policies guiding candidacy outcomes; and (2) phase 2, individual interviews with SWs to further describe how caregiving plan adequacy impacts LVAD candidacy. RESULTS: Sixty-seven SWs returned surveys (rr=47%) from unique programs. Caregiving plan inadequacy (n=30) was the most common psychosocial dealbreaker. When asked what duration of caregiving is required, 23% indicated ≥3 months, 27% 4 to 12 weeks, and 30% <4 weeks. Two reported no duration requirement, 6 stated an indefinite 24/7 commitment was necessary. Across 22 interviews, SWs mirrored that caregiving plans were the most common psychosocial contraindication. How caregiving is operationalized varied. Participants voiced a tension between extended caregiving improving outcomes and the sense that some people of color, women, or low socioeconomic status patients struggle to meet stringent requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Policies regarding adequate duration of 24/7 caregiving vary, but inadequate caregiving plans are the most common psychosocial contraindication. Participants worry about patients' ability to meet restrictive requirements, particularly from historically undertreated groups. This highlights a need to operationalize quality caregiving, standardize assessment, and support medically appropriate patients with strained social resources.
Entities:
Keywords:
caregivers; contraindications; health equity; heart failure; social workers
Authors: Mary Amanda Dew; Andrea F DiMartini; Fabienne Dobbels; Kathleen L Grady; Sheila G Jowsey-Gregoire; Annemarie Kaan; Kay Kendall; Quincy-Robyn Young; Susan E Abbey; Zeeshan Butt; Catherine C Crone; Sabina De Geest; Christina T Doligalski; Christiane Kugler; Laurie McDonald; Linda Ohler; Liz Painter; Michael G Petty; Desiree Robson; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Terry D Schneekloth; Jonathan P Singer; Patrick J Smith; Heike Spaderna; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Roger D Yusen; Paula C Zimbrean Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Courtenay R Bruce; Charles G Minard; L A Wilhelms; Mackenzie Abraham; Javier Amione-Guerra; Linda Pham; Sherry D Grogan; Barry Trachtenberg; Martin L Smith; Brian A Bruckner; Jerry D Estep; Kristin M Kostick Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2017-01
Authors: Lisa Kitko; Colleen K McIlvennan; Julie T Bidwell; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Shannon M Dunlay; Lisa M Lewis; Ginny Meadows; Elisabeth L P Sattler; Richard Schulz; Anna Strömberg Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Colleen K McIlvennan; Kate H Magid; Amrut V Ambardekar; Jocelyn S Thompson; Daniel D Matlock; Larry A Allen Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Khadijah Breathett; Erika Yee; Natalie Pool; Megan Hebdon; Janice D Crist; Ryan H Yee; Shannon M Knapp; Sade Solola; Luis Luy; Kathryn Herrera-Theut; Leanne Zabala; Jeff Stone; Marylyn M McEwen; Elizabeth Calhoun; Nancy K Sweitzer Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-07-01
Authors: Colleen K McIlvennan; Larry A Allen; Carolyn Nowels; Andreas Brieke; Joseph C Cleveland; Daniel D Matlock Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2014-05-13
Authors: Keith Churchwell; Mitchell S V Elkind; Regina M Benjamin; April P Carson; Edward K Chang; Willie Lawrence; Andrew Mills; Tanya M Odom; Carlos J Rodriguez; Fatima Rodriguez; Eduardo Sanchez; Anjail Z Sharrief; Mario Sims; Olajide Williams Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kelsey Flint; Erin L Chaussee; Kamal Henderson; Khadijah Breathett; Prateeti Khazanie; Jocelyn S Thompson; Colleen K Mcilvennan; Shane J Larue; Daniel D Matlock; Larry A Allen Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 5.712