Gabriel D Ivey1, Sami Shoucair1, Daniel J Delitto2, Joseph R Habib1, Benedict Kinny-Köster3, Christopher R Shubert1, Kelly J Lafaro1, John L Cameron1, William R Burns1, Richard A Burkhart1, Elizabeth L Thompson4, Amol Narang5, Lei Zheng6, Christopher L Wolfgang3, Jin He7. 1. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 7. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. jhe11@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative chemotherapy following pancreatic cancer resection is the standard of care. The utility of postoperative chemotherapy for patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is unclear. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (2015-2019) were identified. Patients who received less than 2 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or died within 90 days from surgery were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 427 patients (resectable, 22.2%; borderline resectable, 37.9%; locally advanced, 39.8%) were identified with the majority (69.3%) receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Median duration of NAT was 4.1 months. Following resection, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with an improved median overall survival (OS) (28.7 vs. 20.4 months, P = 0.006). Risk-adjusted multivariable modeling showed negative nodal status (N0), favorable pathologic response (College of American Pathologists score 0 & 1), and receipt of postoperative chemotherapy to be independent predictors of improved OS. Regimen, duration, and number of cycles of NAT were not significant predictors. Thirty-four percent (60/176) of node-positive and 50.1% (126/251) of node-negative patients did not receive postoperative chemotherapy due to poor functional status, postoperative complications, and patient preference. Among patients with node-positive disease, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved median OS (27.2 vs. 10.5 months, P < 0.001). Among node-negative patients, postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit (median OS, 30.9 vs. 36.9 months; P = 0.406). CONCLUSION: Although there is no standard NAT regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer, postoperative chemotherapy following NAT and resection appears to be associated with improved OS for patients with node-positive disease.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative chemotherapy following pancreatic cancer resection is the standard of care. The utility of postoperative chemotherapy for patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is unclear. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatectomy after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (2015-2019) were identified. Patients who received less than 2 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or died within 90 days from surgery were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 427 patients (resectable, 22.2%; borderline resectable, 37.9%; locally advanced, 39.8%) were identified with the majority (69.3%) receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Median duration of NAT was 4.1 months. Following resection, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with an improved median overall survival (OS) (28.7 vs. 20.4 months, P = 0.006). Risk-adjusted multivariable modeling showed negative nodal status (N0), favorable pathologic response (College of American Pathologists score 0 & 1), and receipt of postoperative chemotherapy to be independent predictors of improved OS. Regimen, duration, and number of cycles of NAT were not significant predictors. Thirty-four percent (60/176) of node-positive and 50.1% (126/251) of node-negative patients did not receive postoperative chemotherapy due to poor functional status, postoperative complications, and patient preference. Among patients with node-positive disease, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved median OS (27.2 vs. 10.5 months, P < 0.001). Among node-negative patients, postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit (median OS, 30.9 vs. 36.9 months; P = 0.406). CONCLUSION: Although there is no standard NAT regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer, postoperative chemotherapy following NAT and resection appears to be associated with improved OS for patients with node-positive disease.
Authors: Mahul B Amin; Frederick L Greene; Stephen B Edge; Carolyn C Compton; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Robert K Brookland; Laura Meyer; Donna M Gress; David R Byrd; David P Winchester Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Joseph R Habib; Benedict Kinny-Köster; Patrick Bou-Samra; Ranim Alsaad; Elisabetta Sereni; Ammar A Javed; Ding Ding; John L Cameron; Kelly J Lafaro; William R Burns; Jin He; Jun Yu; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard A Burkhart Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ammar A Javed; Ding Ding; Erum Baig; Michael J Wright; Jonathan A Teinor; Daniyal Mansoor; Elizabeth Thompson; Ralph H Hruban; Amol Narang; William R Burns; Richard A Burkhart; Kelly Lafaro; Matthew J Weiss; John L Cameron; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He Journal: World J Surg Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Giovanni Marchegiani; Andrea Caravati; Stefano Andrianello; Tommaso Pollini; Giulia Bernardi; Marco Biancotto; Giuseppe Malleo; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 13.787