Literature DB >> 35861786

Response by Chan to Letter Regarding Article, "In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival in the United States During and After the Initial Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Surge".

Paul S Chan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35861786      PMCID: PMC9297689          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


× No keyword cloud information.

In Response:

As Stewart notes in this and other letters to the editor,[1-3] time variables are particularly hard to collect in a medical emergency such as in-hospital cardiac arrest. Participating hospitals in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry (the data source for our study) devote substantial resources to improving resuscitation outcomes for patients with cardiac arrest, and there are certainly difficulties in accurately capturing data on variables such as time to defibrillation and epinephrine administration. However, the primary focus of this study was about survival outcomes during the COVID-19 surge in 2020. We applaud the hospitals’ tireless efforts to report process and outcome measures during this difficult period in health care delivery, even when they were overwhelmed and understaffed. This transparency in reporting lower survival rates during the first pandemic surge was critical to understanding the impact of COVID-19 on in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in early 2020. We have no reason to believe that hospitals did not apply the same level of transparency to reporting time-based process-of-care measures during the study period. Even as we know that there are some inaccuracies in data collection on time variables (which we expect bias results toward the null), prior studies have found clear associations between time to defibrillation[4] and time to first epinephrine[5] with higher survival rates for in-hospital cardiac arrest. We agree that more accurate collection of time data would, in theory, yield better data; we also agree that hospitals may instead choose to prioritize limited staff resources to quality improvement efforts, which improve survival without neurological disability—the outcome of greatest interest to patients and their families.

Article Information

Disclosures

Dr Chan receives research funding from the American Heart Association.
  6 in total

1.  Time-Interval Data in a Pediatric In-Hospital Resuscitation Study.

Authors:  John A Stewart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Problems with time-interval data from In-hospital resuscitation records.

Authors:  John A Stewart
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival in the United States During and After the Initial Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Surge.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Kevin Kennedy; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Monique A Starks; Saket Girotra
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; Harlan M Krumholz; Graham Nichol; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Time to administration of epinephrine and outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythms: retrospective analysis of large in-hospital data registry.

Authors:  Michael W Donnino; Justin D Salciccioli; Michael D Howell; Michael N Cocchi; Brandon Giberson; Katherine Berg; Shiva Gautam; Clifton Callaway
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-05-20

6.  In-hospital resuscitation of Covid-19 patients is impeded by serious delays, but the problem is obscured by poor time data.

Authors:  John A Stewart
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 29.983

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.