| Literature DB >> 35861573 |
Panteleimon G Takis1,2, Ivan Vuckovic3, Tricia Tan4,5, Aleksandar Denic6, John C Lieske6, Matthew R Lewis1,2, Slobodan Macura7,8.
Abstract
SUMMARY: 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is an established bioanalytical technology for metabolic profiling of biofluids in both clinical and large-scale population screening applications. Recently, urinary protein quantification has been demonstrated using the same 1D 1H NMR experimental data captured for metabolic profiling. Here we introduce NMRpQuant, a freely available platform that builds on these findings with both novel and further optimized computational NMR approaches for rigorous, automated protein urine quantification. The results are validated by interlaboratory comparisons, demonstrating agreement with clinical/biochemical methodologies, pointing at a ready-to-use tool for routine protein urinalyses.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35861573 PMCID: PMC9477529 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinformatics ISSN: 1367-4803 Impact factor: 6.931
Fig. 1.NMRpQuant interface. GUI overview/functionalities/plots (dashed arrows) for automated protein quantification via proteinuric 1H NMR profiles, consisting of 5 ‘button-click’ steps (from left to right): loading of NMR spectra (Step 1), selection of metabolites’ signals filtering method and the type of total protein quantification (Step 2), visualization of the filtering method data (right plotting panel) (Step 3) as well as of the filtered spectra (bottom plotting panel) (Step 4) and selection of filtered spectral region(s) for integration as well as exportation of relative or absolute total protein concentration values (Step 5). Black arrow highlights the option of automated quantification by SMolESY-based filtering, skipping Steps 2–5
Fig. 2.NMRpQuant performance. The software was built on a 42 urine samples cohort (Vuckovic ) (left panel) and it was tested on two multicenter validation cohorts consisting of 29 (middle panel) and 46 urine samples (right panel). Independent protein measurements were also carried out via different biochemical methods (i.e. BCA and turbidimetry) (see Supplementary Material). Results (R2 > 0.9) showed a very good agreement between NMRpQuant and clinically/biochemically measured concentrations of total protein in urine