| Literature DB >> 35860697 |
Mads C J Barloese1,2, Christian Bauer1,3, Esben Thade Petersen1,4, Christian Stevns Hansen5, Sten Madsbad6,7, Hartwig Roman Siebner1,7,8.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes causes substantial long-term damage in several organs including the brain. Cognitive decline is receiving increased attention as diabetes has been established as an independent risk factor along with the identification of several other pathophysiological mechanisms. Early detection of detrimental changes in cerebral blood flow regulation may represent a useful clinical marker for development of cognitive decline for at-risk persons. Technically, reliable evaluation of neurovascular coupling is possible with several caveats but needs further development before it is clinically convenient. Different modalities including ultrasound, positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance are used preclinically to shed light on the many influences on vascular supply to the brain. In this narrative review, we focus on the complex link between type 2 diabetes, cognition, and neurovascular coupling and discuss how the disease-related pathology changes neurovascular coupling in the brain from the organ to the cellular level. Different modalities and their respective pitfalls are covered, and future directions suggested.Entities:
Keywords: alzheimer’s disease; cognitive decline; neuroimaging; neurovascular coupling (NVC); type 2 diabetes (T2D)
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35860697 PMCID: PMC9289474 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.874007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Figure 1Overview of the complex and multifactorial mechanisms which lead to impaired cognition in type 2 diabetes. The focus of this review is the specific diabetic influence on neurovascular coupling and how this leads to impaired cognition (bold in the figure).
Operational definitions of cognitive decline.
| Diabetic “cognopathy” ( | Research term referring to cognitive impairment (e.g., memory impairment, reduced psychomotor speed, affected executive function, verbal fluency and attention) that is attributable to diabetes mellitus, typically associated with functional and structural changes in the brain |
| Subjective cognitive decline ( |
Self-experienced persistent decline in cognitive capacity in comparison with a previously normal status and unrelated to an acute event. Normal age-, gender-, and education-adjusted performance on standardized cognitive tests, which are used to classify Mild cognitive impairment, prodromal AD, or dementia Can be explained by a psychiatric or neurologic disease, medical disorder, medication, or substance use |
| Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) ( | Measurable cognitive impairment without effect on activities of daily living. |
| Alzheimer’s disease (AD) ( | Progressive cognitive decline (i.e., impaired memory) |
Figure 2Possible scenario for clinical progression (x-axis) from pre-diabetes to manifest clinical diabetic “cognopathy”. Moderators and comorbidity represent all diseases and factors present before and after T2DM onset such as sleep apnea, obesity, hypertension etc. Adapted from Jessen and colleagues (27).
Figure 3Schematic summary of the neurovascular coupling cascade (46). The cellular substrate for each step is seen, PN – principal neuron, IN – interneuron, AC – astrocyte, PC – pericyte, SMC – smooth muscle cell, ETC – endothelial cells, SC-proj. – subcortical projections from locus coeruleus, basal forebrain, raphe nuclei, PV-proj. – perivascular projections from cranial autonomic ganglia. The bottom rows describe the possible influence of diabetes on each step and how this has been detected.
Figure 4Idealized BOLD response. Steady-state is disrupted by a stimulus which results in an initial dip, an overshoot and lastly an undershoot before steady-state is re-acquired. The rising curve reflects an increase in magnetic field uniformity due to washout of paramagnetic deoxyhemoglobin.