| Literature DB >> 35860515 |
Mengyi Gu1, Robert D Hartman2, Johan A Desaeger1.
Abstract
Hot water treatment was evaluated for its efficacy in controlling Meloidogyne arenaria on caladium. Caladium tubers pre-infested with M. arenaria were immersed in hot water at 50°C for 0 min, 30 min, and 45 min before being planted into 16.5-cm pots filled with sterilized sandy soil. Two caladium cultivars Florida Sweetheart PP 8526 (SWT) and Postman Joyner (PJR), each with three tuber sizes [#3 (<1.5 inch), #1 (1.5-2.5 inch), and Jumbo (>2.5 inch)], were evaluated. Ninety days after the first shoot observation, the number of nematode eggs in roots and second-stage juveniles in soil were significantly reduced, but not eliminated, in both 30 min and 45 min treatments; the 45 min treatment had better results than the 30 min treatment. The efficacy of hot water treatment was affected by caladium cultivar, but not by tuber size. The treated PJR tubers had lower nematode numbers than those of the cultivar SWT. The difference in nematode number between the two caladium cultivars might be related to the morphological characteristics of caladium tubers, as the scale-like tissue on SWT tubers might provide refuge for root-knot nematodes from heat damage. Further research needs to be conducted on determining heat-tolerant thresholds for different Meloidogyne spp. and different caladium cultivars, which will help improve nematode management strategies for caladium growers.Entities:
Keywords: Caladium; Caladium × hortulanum; Meloidogyne arenaria; hot water treatment; management; non-chemical; root-knot nematodes; thermotherapy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35860515 PMCID: PMC9260818 DOI: 10.2478/jofnem-2022-0016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nematol ISSN: 0022-300X Impact factor: 1.481
An ANOVA summary table. Effects of hot water exposure time, caladium cultivar, and tuber size on tuber infection and reproduction of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne arenaria).
| Factor | Gall indexa | Eggs per | Eggs per | Eggs per | Number of J2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (0–10) | fresh root systema | gram fresh roota | gram dry roota | per 200 cc soila | |||||||||||
| DF |
| P-value | DF |
| DF |
| DF |
| DF |
| |||||
| Exposure time | 2 | 247.12 | <0.01 | 2 | 242.76 | <0.01 | 2 | 304.14 | <0.01 | 2 | 260.12 | <0.01 | 2 | 274.5 | <0.01 |
| Cultivar | 1 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 1 | 11.07 | <0.01 | 1 | 13.10 | <0.01 | 1 | 13.67 | <0.01 | 1 | 4.20 | 0.04 |
| Tuber size | 2 | 1.35 | 0.26 | 2 | 0.27 | 0.77 | 2 | 0.06 | 0.94 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2 | 0.21 | 0.81 |
| Exposure time × Cultivar | 2 | 3.07 | 0.05 | 2 | 8.81 | <0.01 | 2 | 6.83 | <0.01 | 2 | 7.99 | <0.01 | 2 | 5.61 | <0.01 |
| Exposure time x Tuber size | 4 | 1.87 | 0.12 | 4 | 1.33 | 0.26 | 4 | 1.02 | 0.40 | 4 | 1.37 | 0.25 | 4 | 1.33 | 0.26 |
| Cultivar × Tuber size | 2 | 4.33 | 0.01 | 2 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 2 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 2 | 0.67 | 0.52 | 2 | 0.13 | 0.88 |
| Exposure time x Cultivar × Tuber size | 4 | 2.30 | 0.06 | 4 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 4 | 0.46 | 0.76 | 4 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 4 | 0.32 | 0.86 |
Data were fit to Lognormal distribution in the Glimmix model in SAS University Edition.
Effects of factor combinations (hot water exposure time, caladium cultivar, and tuber size) on reproduction of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne arenaria) on caladium.
| Cultivar | Exposure time @ 50°C (min) | Tuber size | Gall index (0–10) | Eggs per fresh root system‡ | Eggs per gram fresh root‡ | Eggs per gram dry root‡ | Number of J2 per 200 cc soil‡ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJR | 45 | #3 | 0.0 c† | 0 e | 0 c | 0 f | 23 b |
| #1 | 0.2 c | 30 de | 2 c | 37 ef | 23 b | ||
| Jumbo | 0.2 c | 30 de | 2 c | 37 def | 0 b | ||
| 30 | #3 | 0.0 c | 30 de | 3 c | 96 def | 0 b | |
| #1 | 0.0 c | 90 de | 6 c | 105 def | 0 b | ||
| Jumbo | 0.0 c | 270 de | 16 c | 351 def | 35 b | ||
| 0 | #3 | 4.2 b | 218,325 ab | 18,008 a | 526,917 a | 28,500 a | |
| #1 | 5.5 ab | 297,060 a | 15,950 a | 336,192 ab | 40,486 a | ||
| Jumbo | 7.5 a | 441,465 a | 24,584 a | 465,989 a | 18,169 a | ||
| SWT | 45 | #3 | 0.7 c | 47,265 de | 3,418 bc | 128,769 def | 1,563 b |
| #1 | 0.0 c | 0 e | 0 c | 0 f | 0 b | ||
| Jumbo | 0.0 c | 270 de | 13 c | 364 def | 0 b | ||
| 30 | #3 | 0.9 c | 78,855 cd | 6,418 bc | 201,141 cd | 2,218 b | |
| #1 | 0.7 c | 37,320 bc | 1,977 b | 53,004 bc | 3,838 b | ||
| Jumbo | 0.9 c | 75,840 cd | 2,725 bc | 49,099 cde | 7,010 b | ||
| 0 | #3 | 5.6 ab | 275,415 a | 22,800 a | 731,665 a | 11,940 a | |
| #1 | 5.0 b | 245,490 ab | 19,077 a | 497,953 ab | 15,698 a | ||
| Jumbo | 5.1 b | 343,875 a | 21,171 a | 517,797 a | 23,823 a |
Within each column, LSMeans sharing the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05), according to Tukey– Kramer Test.
Data were fit to Lognormal distribution in the Glimmix model in SAS University Edition, and non-transformed data were presented.
LSMeans, least squares means; PJR, Postman Joyner; SWT, Florida Sweetheart PP 8526.
An ANOVA summary table. Effects of hot water exposure time, caladium cultivar, and tuber size on caladium growth parameters.
| Factor | Fresh shoot weight† (g) | Dry shoot weight† (g) | Fresh root weight† (g) | Dry root weight† (g) | Plant height† (cm) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF |
| DF |
| DF |
| DF |
| DF |
| ||||||
| Exposure time | 2 | 19.62 | <0.01 | 2 | 8.03 | <0.01 | 2 | 18.46 | <0.01 | 2 | 6.07 | <0.01 | 2 | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| Cultivar | 1 | 9.75 | <0.01 | 1 | 29.47 | <0.01 | 1 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 1 | 5.37 | 0.02 | 1 | 389.94 | <0.01 |
| Tuber size | 2 | 275.65 | <0.01 | 2 | 181.33 | <0.01 | 2 | 13.83 | <0.01 | 2 | 32.07 | <0.01 | 2 | 12.28 | <0.01 |
| Exposure time × Cultivar | 2 | 1.86 | 0.16 | 2 | 0.94 | 0.39 | 2 | 6.08 | <0.01 | 2 | 6.98 | <0.01 | 2 | 6.50 | <0.01 |
| Exposure time x Tuber size | 4 | 0.87 | 0.49 | 4 | 0.49 | 0.75 | 4 | 0.87 | 0.48 | 4 | 0.47 | 0.76 | 4 | 1.16 | 0.33 |
| Cultivar × Tuber size | 2 | 4.63 | 0.01 | 2 | 4.57 | 0.01 | 2 | 2.12 | 0.12 | 2 | 3.34 | 0.04 | 2 | 1.06 | 0.35 |
| Exposure time x Cultivar × Tuber size | 4 | 1.73 | 0.15 | 4 | 1.83 | 0.13 | 4 | 0.88 | 0.48 | 4 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 4 | 1.21 | 0.31 |
Data were fit to Gaussian distribution in the Glimmix model in SAS University Edition.
Effects of factor combinations (hot water exposure time, caladium cultivar, and tuber size) on caladium growth parameters.
| Cultivar | Exposure time @ 50°C (min) | Tuber size | Fresh shoot weight (g) | Dry shoot weight (g) | Fresh root weight (g) | Dry root weight (g) | Plant height (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJR | 45 | #3 | 89.8 ghij† | 6.4 fghij | 15.5 bc | 0.59 abc | 34.4 b |
| #1 | 121.0 efg | 8.0 defg | 20.2 ab | 0.93 ab | 34.3 b | ||
| Jumbo | 184.2 ab | 11.7 ab | 20.9 ab | 0.90 ab | 36.3 ab | ||
| 30 | #3 | 74.7 ij | 5.4 hij | 13.85 bc | 0.5 bc | 33.8 b | |
| #1 | 131.0 def | 9.3 bcde | 14.8 bc | 0.75 abc | 36.0 ab | ||
| Jumbo | 197.1 a | 13.1 a | 17.1 abc | 0.85 ab | 39.8 a | ||
| 0 | #3 | 67.8 j | 5.1 ij | 13.1 bc | 0.52 bc | 34.2 b | |
| #1 | 106.5 fghi | 8.1 defg | 18.3 abc | 0.93 ab | 37.7 ab | ||
| Jumbo | 154.7 bcd | 11.3 abc | 15.3 bc | 0.88 ab | 37.4 ab | ||
| SWT | 45 | #3 | 84.0 hij | 5.2 ij | 15.6 bc | 0.50 bc | 27.5 c |
| #1 | 126.9 def | 7.9 efgh | 21.4 ab | 0.84 ab | 27.6 c | ||
| Jumbo | 169.3 abc | 10.5 bcd | 24.0 a | 1.02 a | 28.4 c | ||
| 30 | #3 | 80.7 hij | 5.7 ghij | 15.4 bc | 0.54 bc | 25.1 c | |
| #1 | 111.8 efgh | 7.6 efghi | 17.4 abc | 0.69 abc | 25.7 c | ||
| Jumbo | 155.2 bcd | 10.0 bcde | 20.8 ab | 1.00 a | 27.4 c | ||
| 0 | #3 | 67.9 j | 4.4 j | 10.1 c | 0.33 c | 23.9 c | |
| #1 | 99.3 fghij | 6.7 fghij | 10.0 c | 0.39 c | 24.3 c | ||
| Jumbo | 143.5 cde | 8.9 cdef | 15.5 bc | 0.69 abc | 27.3 c |
Within each column, LSMeans sharing the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05), according to Tukey– Kramer Test.
LSMeans, least squares means; PJR, Postman Joyner; SWT, Florida Sweetheart PP 8526.
Figure 1Aboveground symptoms of the two caladium cultivars SWT and PJR, each with three tuber sizes “#3” (small), “#1” (medium), and “Jumbo” (large), at the end of the experiment. Within the same tuber size, 30-min and 45-min hot water treated caladium tubers had more shoots when compared to the control. PJR, Postman Joyner; SWT, Florida Sweetheart PP 8526.
Figure 2The appearances of the two caladium cultivars SWT and PJR. Cultivar PJR grows taller and has bigger leaves than cultivar SWT. PJR, Postman Joyner; SWT, Florida Sweetheart PP 8526.