Literature DB >> 3586042

Differences in antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates in Saudi Arabia and the United States.

S M Qadri, S Ostrawski, S Johnson, D J Flournoy.   

Abstract

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of 3,530 clinical isolates at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH), in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were compared with those of 11,041 bacterial isolates at two hospitals of comparable size in the United States. The gram-negative bacteria, especially Escherichia coli, Proteus-Morganella group, Enterobacter sp, Serratia marcescens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were generally more resistant to ampicillin, carbenicillin, cephalosporin, gentamicin, piperacillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at KFSH than in the United States. A larger number of isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae were more resistant to cephalosporin, chloramphenical, gentamicin, piperacillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at one of the tertiary care hospitals in the United States. Hemophilus influenzae and gram-positive cocci exhibited similar susceptibilities toward commonly used antibiotics at all three institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3586042      PMCID: PMC2625486     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  18 in total

1.  An outbreak of dysentery caused by Shigella dysenteriae type 1 on a coral island in the Bay of Bengal.

Authors:  M M Rahaman; M M Khan; K M Aziz; M S Islam; A K Kibriya
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 2.  Patterns and mechanisms of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  B E Murray; R C Moellering
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 3.  Changing patterns of susceptibility of common bacterial pathogens to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  M Finland
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Methods and significance of in vitro testing of bacterial sensitivity to drugs.

Authors:  R G Petersdorf; J C Sherris
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Acquisition of trimethoprim resistance in epidemic strain of Shigella dysenteriae type 1 from Zaire.

Authors:  J A Frost; B Rowe; J Vandepitte
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Rapid emergence of El Tor Vibrio cholerae resistant to antimicrobial agents during first six months of fourth cholera epidemic in Tanzania.

Authors:  F S Mhalu; P W Mmari; J Ijumba
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-02-17       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  M H Grieco
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.456

8.  Antibiotic use in animals and human salmonellosis.

Authors:  J V Bennett
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  Monoclonal antibodies of hybridomas.

Authors:  J G Sinkovics; G R Dreesman
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb

10.  Salmonella typhi resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and other antimicrobial agents: strains isolated during an extensive typhoid fever epidemic in Mexico.

Authors:  J Olarte; E Galindo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  2 in total

1.  Saudi Arabian-American differences in antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas.

Authors:  S M Qadri; W H Rizvi; S A Rahman; F al-Dayel; D J Flournoy
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Comparative activity of the new fluoroquinolone rufloxacin (MF 934) against clinical isolates of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  S M Qadri; Y Ueno; G Postle; D Tullo; J San Pedro
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.267

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.