A review of NTRK fusions in cancer.

The family of the neurotrophic tropomyosin kinase receptors (NTRK or TRK) is a part of the transmembrane tyrosine kinases responsible for neuronal development. The members of this receptor family are TRKA, TRKB and TRKC and they are encoded by the genes NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3. Alterations of NTRK genes can induce carcinogenesis both in neurogenic and non-neurogenic cells. The prevalence of NTRK gene fusion is under 1% in solid tumors, but is highly encountered in rare tumors. The presence of NTRK 1 gene fusion is associated, in some types of neoplasia, with a favorable evolution, but the presence of NTRK 2 may be associated with a poor prognosis. The identification of cancer patients harboring NTRK gene fusions is constantly growing, especially with the advent of NTRK inhibitors. This has promisingly provided a rationale for personalized therapeutics that improved outcomes in settings with this signature.

Introduction

The family of the neurotrophic tropomyosin kinase receptors (NTRK or TRK) are a part of the transmembrane tyrosine kinases responsible for neuronal development. The three members of this receptor family TRKA, TRKB and TRKC, encoded by the genes NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3, have an extracellular binding domain, a transmembrane region and an intracellular kinase domain [1]. The ligands of NTRK receptors are called neurotrophins and have a particular site for binding. The nerve growth factor (NGF) binds with NTRK1, the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) together with neurotrophin 4 and 5 bind with NTRK2 and neurotrophin 3 binds with NTRK3 but also with NTRK1. The binding of the neutrophins with their receptors determines the activation of the effectors within NTRK signaling such as C- γ phospholipase, mitogen activated protein kinase or phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase. These receptors are protemers for the proliferation and survival of the neural cells [2]. Alterations of NTRK genes can induce carcinogenesis both in neurogenic and non-neurogenic cells. These alterations are being used as predictive biomarkers for emerging targeted agents but as genetic alterations; they are very rarely present in solid tumors. A study by Li et al. [3] that enrolled 173 patients with pulmonary cancer revealed NTRK alterations in 8 patients including 4 NTRK gene mutations, 2 NTRK gene fusions, and 2 NTRK gene deletions. The prevalence of NTRK gene fusion is under 1% in solid tumors, but is highly seen in rare tumors such as mammary secretory carcinoma, mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland, congenital infantile fibrosarcoma (fusion prevalence is almost 100%), and other rarer tumors. NTRK fusion is present in approximately 40% of high-grade non-brainstem pediatric gliomas. These fusions are more likely present in NTRK1 and NTRK2 genes [2,4].

Epidemiology of NTRK gene fusion in cancer

NTRK gene fusion is present in several cancers including both adult and pediatric populations. Two categories of NTRK fusion cancers can be individualized, rare cancers where the frequency of NTRK gene fusion is approximately 80% and common cancers having5 to 25% alterations of this gene (Table 1).

Table 1

NTRK gene fusions in cancer types.

NTRK gene fusion	Type of cancer	References
NTRK1
LMNA-NTRK1	Colorectal cancer	[5]
	Sarcoma	[6]
	Spitzoid melanoma	[7]
	Adolescent and young adult sarcoma	[8]
	Infantile congenital fibrosarcoma	[9]
TPM3 – NTRK1	Colorectal	[10]
	Papillary thyroid carcinoma	[11]
	Glioblastoma	[12]
SQSTM1-NTRK1	Non-small cell lung carcinoma	[13,14]
NFASC-NTRK1	Multiform glioblastoma	[15,16]
BCAN-NTRK1	Multiform glioblastoma	[17,18]
PPL-NTRK1	Thyroid carcinoma	[19]
RFWD2-NTRK1	Large cell neuroendocrine lung cancer	[20]
CD74-NTRK1	Lung adenocarcinoma	[21]
MPRIP-NTRK1	Lung adenocarcinoma	[22]
RABGAP1L-NTRK1	Invasive cervical cancer	[23]
TFG-NTRK1	Thyroid carcinoma	[24]
TP53-NTRK1	Spitzoid melanoma	[25]
NTRK2
Unknown– NTRK2	Appendix adenocarcinoma	[26]
AFAP1- NTRK2	Low-grade glioma	[27]
AGBL4-NTRK2	Glioblastoma	[28]
NACC2-NTRK2	Pilocytic astrocytoma	[29]
PAN3-NTRK2	Head and neck squamous carcinoma	[28]
QKI – NTRK2	Pilocytic astrocytoma	[29]
TRIM 24 – NTRK2	Lung adenocarcinoma	[28]
VCL – NTRK2	Glioblastoma	[28]
NTRK3
ETV6 – NTRK3	Glioblastoma, ductal carcinoma, fibrosarcoma, congenital mesoblastic nephroma, irradiation associated-thyroid cancer, papillary thyroid cancer, GIST, colorectal cancer, secretory mammary pulmonary analogue cancer, acute myeloid leukemia	[[30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]

Notably, NTRK gene fusion is present in 90–100% of mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of the breast, in >90% of mammary secretory carcinoma, in 91–100% of fibrosarcoma and in 83% of congenital mesoblastic nephroma. Although the frequency of NTRK fusion is smaller; it is present in 14.5% of thyroid irradiation associated-cancer, 26% of papillary thyroid cancer and 16% of spitzoid tumors. In common cancers, the frequency of NTRK gene fusion is less than 5%. Head and neck neoplasms have approximately 0.2% of this alteration, 0.2–0.3% were found in pulmonary cancer, 0.7–1.5% in colorectal cancer, 0.3% in cutaneous melanoma, and 1% in sarcoma [6].

Methods for NTRK fusion detection

Immunohistochemistry to examine NTRK protein expression has a number of advantages. It is accessible and affordable, easy to implement, and is already routinely used in many diagnostic laboratories. It also has a lower cost than other methods, requires a single-colored blade and has a fast turnover. The most used clone is EPR17341 (Abcam and Roche/Ventana) which reacts with a peptide in the C-terminal portion of TRK-A, TRK-B and TRK-C, thus causing a reaction with any fusion of NTRK genes. Positive staining was established to be present in at least 1% of tumor cells. The sensitivity for NTRK 1 and NTRK 2 fusions is estimated at approximately 96% and 100%, respectively, while for NTRK3 around 79% [1].

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH method) is often used in laboratories to detect oncogene fusion in solid tumors. This method can detect large structural variations in DNA. There is currently a diagnostic test available for the ETV6 gene which is most commonly encountered as a fusion oncogene with NTRK3. In positive cases, a green signal may be seen when the structure is affected at the 3 ′centromeric end and an orange signal when structural change occurs at the end 5'. Other FISH kits are being developed and will be available in the future for different NTRK gene fusion partners [1].

Reverse transcriptase chain polymerase reaction (RT–PCR) can be used to detect the presence of transcribed RNA, thus able to evaluate and detect qualitatively and quantitatively the presence of a single fusion oncogene for which both fusion partners are known [1]. In the case of NTRK gene fusion, due to multiple fusion partners, the utility of RT-PCR is limited and it is used mainly for ETV6-NTRK3 fusion detection [1].

The next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) technology can also be used and it is based on the extraction of tumor DNA from tissue fixed in formalin-paraffin and subsequently sequenced to determine if there are specific genetic alterations in tumor tissues. There are also disadvantages of this method, such as the length of the gene introns. NTRK3 gene introns have a length of about 193 KB and are too long for an accurate sequencing and also that fact of the presence of new partner genes, not yet identified yet, of fusions with NTRK genes [1].

On the other hand, transcriptomics using next-generation RNA sequencing is advantageous over NGS of DNA. Introns are sequenced outside the RNA, which eliminates the technical limitation given by “covering” the introns. In addition, by this method, the detection of RNA fusion ensures the direct evidence that these are functionally transcribed. Transcribed fusions can be detected more accurately in the RNA of tumors with small pieces of purity, due to the fact that gene fusions are of greater expression in the tumor tissues [1].

Oncological aspects of NTRK gene fusions

Lung cancer

Fusions of the NTRK gene are found to a small extent in lung cancer, with an incidence of around 0.1% [37]. Regarding the NTRK1 and NTRK2 genes, it was noticed that they are found mainly in the normal epidermis, oral mucosa and epidermal carcinomas and particularly NTRK2 in the lung, the liver and the heart tissue [7].

NTRK1 and NTRK2 are preferentially expressed in squamous cell carcinoma as compared to other histological types, especially adenocarcinoma. Data from studies in patients with primary lung cancer showed that NTRK1 has a high specificity (92.8%) in a group of 686 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, but has a low sensitivity 71.6%. In the same group of patients, NTRK2 had a specificity of 96.4%, but also with a low sensitivity of 51.3%. Accumulating data from several studies demonstrated that NTRK2 may be a useful biomarker for squamous cell proliferation. Moreover, a study performed on 60 patients with non-microcellular lung cancer, found that NTRK2 expression was 66.7%and remarkably, a statistically significant correlation between NTRK2 gene expression and TNM stage and secondary lymphatic determinations was also observed [7]. However, another study found that the presence of NTRK1 does not significantly influence the prognosis of squamous cell carcinoma or lung adenocarcinoma, but is a positive prognostic factor for patients with squamous cell carcinoma regardless of gender, age, stage or smoking status [8]. The association between the presence of NTRK2 and a good prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma may suggest an important role of this gene in the biology of this type of neoplasia [8].

Colorectal and thyroid cancers

The first fusion of the NTRK gene was discovered in 1986 in a patient with colorectal cancer. Since then, this fusion has been reported in about 2% of patients with this type of cancer. Later, multiple studies have concluded that TPM3-NTRK1 fusion is found mainly in colorectal carcinoma, in addition to the relatively high frequency of TPR-NTRK1 fusion [37]. Among the characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer who also have fusion of the NTRK gene are female sex, location in the right colon and microsatellite instability phenotype (MSI) [9]. In thyroid cancer, two years after the identification of the fusion of the NTRK gene in colorectal cancer, the fusion was also identified in 4 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Subsequent studies have shown that in this type of carcinoma, NTRK rearrangements take place in the tyrosine kinase domain of the NTRK1 gene and the 5 ′end of the 3 partners (TRKT1, TRKT2 and TRKT3). Currently the estimated incidence of NTRK1 gene fusion in papillary thyroid carcinoma is <12%. In particular, ETV-NTRK3 fusion was identified in approximately 14.5% of a group of 62 patients with radiation-associated thyroid cancer who were exposed to radiation after a nuclear accident of Chernobyl [37].

Cancer of the central nervous system

Neuroblastoma

Several reports found that NTRK receptors play an important role in the development of neuroblastomas. NTRK1/TrkA is expressed in tumors with favorable evolution, which have more chances of regression, or which respond favorably to usual therapy. High levels of NTRK1 were correlated with favorable risk factors such as young age, histological type, etc. NTRK2/TrkB is expressed in tumors with unfavorable evolution, usually tumors that also have MYCN amplification. These tumors co-express a ligand for TrkB, BDNF, creating an autocrine pathway that causes drug resistance, angiogenesis, increased invasiveness, and a tendency to metastasize. Regarding TrkC, it was observed that the effects of its expression in medulloblastomas are similar to the effects of TrkA expression in neuroblastomas [10,11].

Glioma

From a clinical point of view, it has been shown that gliomas that have fusions of the NTRK gene can affect any compartment of the central nervous system, being predominantly hemispherical in both the adult and pediatric populations. Also, gliomas with a low degree of differentiation and showing fusion of the NTRK gene may show an aggressive clinical course. It has been observed that the fusion of NTRK genes differs as a percentage depending on age. NTRK2 is predominant in the pediatric population while NTRK1 is found in the adult population [12].

Melanoma

NTRK fusions can also be seen in melanoma. In a study of 751 melanoma patients, 4 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma were identified in the lymph nodes, skin, colon and duodenum, and showed fusion of the NTRK gene [13]. The types of fusions associated with melanomas reported so far are LMNA-NTRK1, TP53-NTRK1, ETV6-NTRK3, MYO5A-NTRK3 and MYH9-NTRK3 [13].

Hematological neoplasms

NTRK gene fusions are also found in hematologic neoplasms, such as the ETV6-NTRK fusion in acute myeloid leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, and Philadelphia-like acute chromosome lymphoblastic leukemia. Other fusions have also been found in patients with leukemia including two fusions of the NTRK 2 gene (A203Tsi R458G) and two fusions of the NTRK 3 gene (E176D and L449F). The therapeutic response of these neoplasms to the administration of TRK inhibitors such as larotrectinib and entrectinib is surprisingly favorable, and may provide a promise to this cancer population with a personalized treatment of all neoplasms with NTRK gene fusions [14].

NTRK fusions and emerging therapeutics

Targeting NTRK associated cancers has led to the development of two innovative therapies including larotrectinib and entrectinib which were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 and 2019 respectively. Unlike entrectinib which is a multikinase inhibitor that targets TrkA, TrkB, TrkC, ROS1 and ALK1, larotrectinib is a selective pan-Trk inhibitor, being the first oral “tumor-agnostic” treatment and the first developed simultaneously for both adults and children [[15], [16], [17]]. Both treatments are administered orally, penetrate the blood-brain barrier and have demonstrated efficacy and safety in locally advanced, even metastatic, cancers that show NTRK gene fusions, regardless of location, type of fusion, histopathological type or age of the patient within the pediatric population [18]The identification of patients with neoplasms with NTRK gene fusions is constantly growing, especially with the advent of NTRK inhibitors, thus, allowing a personalized therapeutic approach. This has increased efficacy, good tolerance, acceptable route of administration with long-term favorable effects. Therefore, it is important to determine the fusion of NTRK genes in locally advanced or metastatic neoplasms, and beyond because of its potential as a predictive biomarker. By using this personalized, targeted, well-tolerated oncologic treatments such as entrectinib and larotrectinib multikinase inhibitors, improved outcomes may be achieved. This includes the stage of neoplasia that may decrease which can give the patient a chance for curative multimodal oncological and surgical treatment, even in stages that are initially advanced.

NTRK fusions as prognostic biomarkers

NTRK gene fusions are emerging biomarkers and their use in translational research and also for patients’ stratification is at its beginning. Particularly, NTRK1-3 fusions with other genes were recently studied in several solid tumors harboring this signature as predictors of prognosis (Table 2) [[38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]]. In thyroid carcinomas, a cohort of 259 patients assessed NTRK chromosomal rearrangements and their correlation with histological patterns [39]. Indeed, patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumors had follicular growth feature, chronic thyroiditis with lymphocytic infiltration and lymphatic dissemination. In addition, carcinomas cases harboring NTRK1 rearrangement were associated with multifocal and aggressive tumors. Remarkably, this genetic alteration was one of prognostic factors identified in this study in addition to tumor size, metastasis, and late TP53 and TERT mutations [39]. In the pediatric population, these authors have also investigated these fusions in papillary thyroid carcinomas which may have distinct features including molecular profiles [43]. In this perspective, the authors investigated the genetic profile of these tumors in a cohort of 93 patients using DNA and RNA targeted next-generation sequencing. The most common identified altered genes were RET and NTRK3. In fact, fusions in NTRK3 were found associated with follicular feature of this aggressive entity. On the other hand, molecular profiling NTRK1/3 fusions in other pediatric tumors such as those of mesenchymal origin such as sarcomas is not well studied. Another recent study reviewed NTRK fusion positive sarcomas and showed, based on next-generation sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization, that they highly express Trk protein [41] which is responsible of the activation of a number of key downstream intracellular pathways, including the MAPK pathway (reviewed elsewhere: see: [46]). The authors also identified a fusion (ETV6-NTRK3) that is associated with good prognosis [41]. Thus, this suggests that not all NTRK fusions are predictive of aggressive behavior. Moreover, it seems that not all NTRK fusions are translating prognostic outcomes. In glioblastoma for example, Woo et al. demonstrated that NTRK fusions have no effects on prognosis [42]. However, other recent reports found that these alterations may be associated with acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and also with unfavorable survival outcomes, respectively, in non-small cell lung cancer and other multiple solid cancers [40,44]. Promisingly and in a recent advance, Rolfo et al. investigated a liquid biopsy-based approach to assess activating fusions of NTRK in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with advanced solid cancers [38]. These authors were able to identify NTRK1 fusions including some unique alterations that were correlated with those detected in corresponding tissues. Thus, highlighting the importance of ctDNA as a non-invasive screening method to select patients to benefit from targeted therapies [38].

Table 2

Recent findings on the impact of NTRK fusions in cancer.

Author/year	Study design	NTRK gene	Setting	Findings
Rolfo et al., 2022 [51]	Retrospective biomarker study	NTRK1	Multiple cancer types	-Liquid biopsy based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) identified NTRK1 fusions including unique variants with high predictive value.
Pekova et al., 2021 [52]	Retrospective biomarker study	NTRK1 and NTRK3	Thyroid carcinoma	-NTRK fusion-positive patients had follicular growth pattern, chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and lymph node metastases.-Carcinomas harboring NTRK1-rearrangements are more aggressive than NTRK3-positive tumors.-NTRK fusions are associated with survival outcomes.
Bazhenova et al., 2021 [53]	Retrospective biomarker study	NTRK1-3	Multiple cancer types	-Overall survival of patients with NTRK fusions might be reduced.
Kang et al., 2020 [54]	Retrospective biomarker study	NTRK1 and NTRK3	Pediatric sarcomas	-Childs with NTRK fusions highly expressed Trk protein.-Use of immunohistochemistry may help in diagnosing NTRK positive tumors.-Patients harboring ETV6-NTRK3 fusions fibrosarcoma had excellent prognosis.
Woo et al., 2020 [55]	Retrospective biomarker study	NTRK 2 and 3	Glioblastomas	-Glioblastomas can also harbor NTRK fusions but they do not affect prognosis.
Pekova et al., 2020 [56]	Cohort	NTRK3	Pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma	-NTRK3 positive cases were associated with the follicular variant of this pediatric cancer.
Xia et al., 2020 [57]	Retrospective biomarker study	NTRK1	Non-small cell lung cancer	-NTRK1 positive fusion might be associated with acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Lasota et al., 2020 [58]	Case series	NTRK1 and NTRK3	Colon cancer	-Colorectal cancers with NTRK fusions are rare and distinct.

Conclusion

NTRK fusions in cancer are an emerging target in modern precision oncology. It is therefore important to determine the fusion of NTRK genes in locally advanced or metastatic neoplasms, and beyond. Ongoing clinical trials may provide better evidence to explore this target in the future.

Ethical approval

Not needed for this mini-review.

Sources of funding

None.

Author contribution

CAM, AZ and DCB were responsible for writing of the manuscript. ICP and CGS were responsible for reviewing and editing of the manuscript. IDS, CGP, XB and VB made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work. VTS were responsible for critically reviewing the manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Registration of research studies

Not needed for this narrative mini-review.

Guarantor

Dr. Xenia Bacinschi (MD)

Consent

No consents were needed.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest for this case series.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.