| Literature DB >> 35860000 |
Firdous Sayed Mohammed1, Arya Ghosh2, Sourav Pal1, Chayan Das1, Suliman Yousef Alomar3, Mohsina Patwekar4, Faheem Patwekar4, Byong-Hun Jeon5, Fahadul Islam6.
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of hydroalcoholic extract of Sechium edule (S.E.) fruits on lipid profile and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters in high fat-diet (HFD) induced hyperlipidemic mice. In this study, grouping of animals was done as described below (n = 6), where group 1 is normal control, group 2 is HFD control, group 3 is HFD + atorvastatin (10 mg/kg), group 4 is HFD + S.E. extract (200 mg/kg), and group 5 is HFD + S.E. extract (400 mg/kg). The first 3 weeks animals were supplemented with HFD, and the last 3 weeks animals were supplemented with HFD along with atorvastatin (10 mg/kg) or S.E. extract (200 and 400 mg/kg). It was observed that mice of the HFD control group showed a significant rise in the total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, and VLDL-C levels and a notable decrease in HDL-C levels. In addition, a consequential increment in ECG parameters such as QT or QTc and RR interval and a noteworthy decline in the heart rate were observed in HFD control mice. Treatment with S.E. extract (200 and 400 mg/kg) showed a significant improvement in the lipid profile. Moreover, the extract also significantly normalized the prolonged QT or QTc and RR interval and the heart rate in HFD-challenged mice. Hence, we can conclude that S.E. extract encumbers the prolongation of QT or QTc and RR interval and increased the heart rate in HFD-challenged mice.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35860000 PMCID: PMC9293576 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8682316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Effect of S.E. extract on lipid profile in HFD-induced hyperlipidemic mice.
| Treatment | Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | Triglycerides (mg/dl) | HDL-C (mg/dl) | LDL-C (mg/dl) | VLDL-C (mg/dl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 75.03 ± 1.18 | 73.63 ± 1.544 | 37.82 ± 1.01 | 22.48 ± 0.84 | 14.72 ± 0.31 |
| HFD control | 200.47 ± 3.52### | 137.30 ± 3.02### | 21.70 ± 0.82### | 148.54 ± 3.03### | 27.45 ± 0.60### |
| HFD + atorvastatin (10 mg/kg) | 97.90 ± 2.50 | 85.82 ± 1.50 | 34.18 ± 0.67 | 46.55 ± 3.18 | 17.165 ± 0.30 |
| HFD + S.E. extract (200 mg/kg) | 103.98 ± 1.04 | 102.72 ± 1.04 | 29.22 ± 0.68 | 55.09 ± 0.97 | 20.599 ± 0.18 |
| HFD + S.E. extract (400 mg/kg) | 92.35 ± 2.46 | 82.55 ± 0.83 | 31.392 ± 0.43 | 44.44 ± 2.56 | 16.437 ± 0.18 |
n = 6, data are expressed in Mean ± SEM.###P < 0.001, HDF control vs. normal control. P < 0.001, treatment groups vs. HDF control.
Effect on S.E. extracts on ECG parameters in HFD-induced hyperlipidemic mice.
| Treatment | QT interval (ms) | QTc interval (ms) | RR interval (ms) | Heart rate (bpm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 118.24 ± 0.37 | 10.22 ± 0.39 | 133.83 ± 0.58 | 448.64 ± 1.85 |
| HFD control | 213.62 ± 2.10### | 14.15 ± 0.56### | 227.65 ± 1.16### | 260.46 ± 1.57### |
| HFD + atorvastatin (10 mg/kg) | 168.43 ± 1.16 | 12.26 ± 0.65 | 188.64 ± 1.24 | 316.04 ± 1.00 |
| HFD + S.E. extract (200 mg/kg) | 138.24 ± 1.02 | 10.97 ± 0.82 | 158.62 ± 1.03 | 370.30 ± 1.66 |
| HFD + S.E. extract (400 mg/kg) | 127.68 ± 1.32 | 10.19 ± 0.30 | 156.89 ± 0.91 | 393.15 ± 2.20 |
n = 6, data are expressed in Mean ± SEM.###P < 0.001, HDF control vs. normal control. P < 0.001, treatment groups vs. HDF control.
Figure 1ECG tracing of animals of all groups. (A) Normal control showing a normal pattern of ECG with normal QT and RR intervals. (B) HFD control showing prolonged QT and RR interval. (C) HFD + Atorvastatin (10 mg/kg) showing decrease in QT and RR intervals. (D) and (E) HFD + S.E. extract (200 and 400 mg/kg) showing prominent attenuation of prolonged QT and RR interval.