| Literature DB >> 35859996 |
Thabitha Aavula1, Vignesh Narasimman1, Saravanan Ramachandran1, Radajurai Murugan2, Murugavel Ponnusamy3, Gururaja Perumal Pazhani4, Sivaleela G5.
Abstract
This study examines the antioxidant and teratogenic effects of two different type's methods of formulating agar from Turbinaria conoides (T. conoides) using a zebrafish model. The agar was extracted using the aqueous extraction method and developed in two different formulations using separate procedures. Formulated agar1 (FA1) used a higher concentration of the ingredients while formulated agar 2 (FA2) had a lesser concentration. The two unique formulated agars (FAs) were studied using biochemical composition, Fourier infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The antioxidant activities of both FAs in vitro were shown to be significantly different (P < 0.05) at various concentrations (60-180 μl/ml) in the study. The toxicity of the FAs was dose-dependent, with FA1 having the least teratogenic activity when compared to FA2. In comparison to FA2, FA1 was found to have higher antioxidant activity. At various concentrations (0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 μg/ml), the teratogenic activity of two FAs was examined in zebrafish embryos (ZFE) at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours post fertilization (hpf). Both FAs exhibit dose-dependent toxicity and increased antioxidant activity, and this can be utilized as an alternative for standard antioxidants, according to this study.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35859996 PMCID: PMC9293546 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3520336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1Extraction and flow chart of FAs.
Yield and biochemical composition of FAs.
| S. no. | Sample | Yield (%) | Sulphate content (%) | Na (%) | K (%) | Mn (%) | Zn (ppm) | Fe (ppm) | Cu (ppm) | Co (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FA 1 | 84.2 | 41.78 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 20 ± 0.3 | 51.1 ± 1.0 | 32.0 ± 1.1 | 76.01 ± 0.4 | 3.12 ± 1.3 |
| 2 | FA 2 | 80.6 | 37.25 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 18.9 ± 0.2 | 48.2 ± 1.5 | 30.3 ± 1.3 | 73.2 ± 0.5 | 1.92 ± 1.5 |
P < 0.05, statistical significance.
Stability of FAs.
| S. no. | Parameters/tests | FA1 (25°C ± 2°C) months (0–3) | FA2 (25°C ± 2°C) months (0–3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colour | Brown colour | Brown colour |
| 2 | Odour | No odour change | No odour change |
| 3 | pH | 6 | 6.5 |
| 4 | Consistency | Smooth | Smooth |
| 5 | Viscosity (m2/s) | 0.413 | 0.61 |
| 6 | Homogeneity | Good | Good |
| 7 | Sterility | No microbial contamination | No microbial contamination |
| 8 | Vibrational test | No phase separation | No phase separation |
| 9 | Centrifugation test | No phase separation | No phase separation |
Figure 2FT-IR spectrum of FAs.
Figure 3(a, b) GC-MS spectrum of FAs.
Figure 4(a, (b) SEM analysis of FAs.
In vitro antioxidant activities of FAs.
| Samples | DPPH scavenging activity (%) | H2O2 activity (%) | Total antioxidant activity (%) | ABTS activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA1 (60 |
|
|
|
|
| FA1 (120 | 69.05 ± 0.9 | 66.52 ± 2.44 | 41.31 ± 1.27 | 66.79 ± 0.16 |
| FA1 (180 |
|
|
|
|
| FA2 (60 |
|
|
|
|
| FA2 (120 | 65.14 ± 0.9 | 62.79 ± 0.47 | 39.17 ± 0.5 | 64.03 ± 1.67 |
| FA2 (180 |
|
|
|
|
| Vitamin E (180 |
|
|
|
|
∗Statistical significance: P < 0.05 (DMRT); Comparison was made between 180 µl of sample and standard.
Figure 5(a, b) Embryotoxicity of FAs.