Literature DB >> 35859613

Biomechanical comparative analysis of temporomandibular joint, glenoid fossa and head of the condyle of conventional models prothesis with new PEEK design.

Wladimir Genovesi1, Iara Cristina Comenale2,3, Wladimir Genovesi Filho4, Moises Veloso Fernandes2,3.   

Abstract

This article reviews the design of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prostheses used for TMJ joint replacement from 2000 to 2020. The TMJ is a complex joint, with distinct anatomical and functional characteristics making it challenging to maintain. Many authors from the early 20th century reported techniques for TMJ reconstruction, with the goal of restoring its shape and ideal function. Many prototypes have been developed in pursuit of an ideal prosthesis that adheres to the principles of biomechanics and biocompatibility, with good long-term performance and lower cost. The TMJ prosthesis is divided in two parts: the glenoid fossa and the mandibular ramus component. These two parts are fixed with metal screws in the glenoid fossa and fixed in the zygomatic arch with 4 or 5 screws. The mandibular part is fixed to the mandible ramus with 8 or 9 titanium screws. In our review, since 2000 to 2020, little has changed to improve the design and allow for natural mandible movement. From 2000 to 2006, 48 TMJ surgeries were performed using UHMWPE with this design. All patients had good results, preserving opening mouth and lateral movements. All the designs are similar in principle. The glenoid fossa, which resembles a box, limiting the rotation and translation movement. It is known that lateral movements are lost in function as the lateral pterygoid muscle is detached.
© 2022 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenoid fossa; PEEK; Prosthesis; TMJ

Year:  2022        PMID: 35859613      PMCID: PMC9289641          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  19 in total

1.  Neuromuscular objectives of the human masticatory apparatus during static biting.

Authors:  L R Iwasaki; P E Petsche; W D McCall; D Marx; J C Nickel
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.633

2.  Prediction of the articular eminence shape in a patient with unilateral hypoplasia of the right mandibular ramus before and after distraction osteogenesis-A simulation study.

Authors:  Mark de Zee; Paolo M Cattaneo; Peter Svensson; Thomas K Pedersen; Birte Melsen; John Rasmussen; Michel Dalstra
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Review of emerging temporomandibular joint total joint replacement systems.

Authors:  R Elledge; L G Mercuri; A Attard; J Green; B Speculand
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of Chinese customized three-dimensionally printed total temporomandibular joint prostheses: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xuzhuo Chen; Yexin Wang; Yi Mao; Zhihang Zhou; Jisi Zheng; Jinze Zhen; Yating Qiu; Shanyong Zhang; Haiyi Qin; Chi Yang
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Effect of Occlusal Splints on the Stress Distribution on the Temporomandibular Joint Disc.

Authors:  Fabiane Maria Ferreira; Paulo Cézar Simamoto-Júnior; Carlos José Soares; António Manuel de Amaral Monteiro Ramos; Alfredo Júlio Fernandes-Neto
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2017 May-Jun

6.  Flattening of the articular eminence is associated with the loss of occlusal support: radiological study.

Authors:  Z Oruba; P Malisz; J Sendek; V E Aardal; N Kopycińska; K Krzystyniak; D Darczuk; T Kaczmarzyk
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.291

7.  Modelling of forces in the human masticatory system with optimization of the angulations of the joint loads.

Authors:  P G Trainor; K R McLachlan; W D McCall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Autologous fat grafts placed around temporomandibular joint total joint prostheses to prevent heterotopic bone formation.

Authors:  Larry M Wolford; Carlos A Morales-Ryan; Patricia Garcia Morales; Daniel Serra Cassano
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2008-07

9.  Temporomandibular joint reconstruction of the complex patient with the Techmedica custom-made total joint prosthesis.

Authors:  L M Wolford; D A Cottrell; C H Henry
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Examination of failed retrieved temporomandibular joint (TMJ) implants.

Authors:  S Kerwell; M Alfaro; R Pourzal; H J Lundberg; Y Liao; C Sukotjo; L G Mercuri; M T Mathew
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.