Literature DB >> 35859213

Complications following all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Tsung-Yu Lin1,2,3, Cheng-Chun Chung1, Wei-Cheng Chen1, Che-Wei Su4, Hsu-Wei Fang5,3, Yung-Chang Lu6,7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of possible perioperative complications following all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Additional techniques and tips are proposed to prevent and manage complications.
METHODS: Complications following all-inside ACLR performed between December 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Altogether, 348 operations were performed and 275 patients were enrolled with a minimum 12-month follow-up period. Only semitendinosus autograft was utilised in most patients, and semitendinosus-gracilis autograft and allograft were used in five and 31 patients, respectively. Simultaneous meniscal repair, partial meniscectomy, and chondral surgery were performed in 29.5%, 21.1%, and 4.4% of patients, respectively. Complications were observed based on the patient's clinical condition, plain film, and magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed pre-operatively and at 12 months post-operatively, using the International Knee Documentation Committee form, Lysholm and Tegner activity scores, and KT1000 side-to-side difference.
RESULTS: Intraoperative and post-operative complications developed in 65 patients (23.6%). The most common complication was cortical button malposition on the femoral side (19.3%). Intra-operative breakage of the retrograde drill was found in two cases (0.73%), with three cases (1.1%) of over-drilling with destruction of the outer cortex. Post-operatively, four (1.5%), 13 (4.7%), and 16 (5.8%) cases of infection, full-thickness re-rupture, and loss of extension, respectively, were recorded. Functional outcome scales showed significant post-operative improvement.
CONCLUSION: Cortical button malposition was the most common but easily preventable complication. All-inside ACLR could be safe and promising after the suggested additional operative techniques and proper perioperative management which decrease complication rates and improve favourable outcomes.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  All-inside technique; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Complications

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35859213     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05515-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  35 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of using one hamstrings tendon for ACL reconstruction: a human cadaveric study.

Authors:  Giovanni Zamarra; Matthew B Fisher; Savio L-Y Woo; Giuliano Cerulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Advantages and Disadvantages of Transtibial, Anteromedial Portal, and Outside-In Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brett N Robin; Sunil S Jani; Sean C Marvil; John B Reid; Carl K Schillhammer; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation.

Authors:  Raul Mayr; Vinzenz Smekal; Christian Koidl; Christian Coppola; Martin Eichinger; Ansgar Rudisch; Christof Kranewitter; René Attal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques?

Authors:  Alexander J Connaughton; Andrew G Geeslin; Christopher W Uggen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-03-19

5.  Randomized controlled trial comparing all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a full tibial tunnel.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz; Randy Schwartzberg; Patrick Smith
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 6.  All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-A Systematic Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Complications.

Authors:  Darren de Sa; Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Melissa Weidman; Devin C Peterson; Nicole Simunovic; Volker Musahl; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Clinical outcomes of anatomic, all-inside, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Authors:  Sam K Yasen; Zakk M Borton; Alistair I Eyre-Brook; Harry C Palmer; Stewart T Cotterill; Mike J Risebury; Adrian J Wilson
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Cortical Suspensory Button Versus Aperture Interference Screw Fixation for Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft-Tissue Allograft: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz; Randy Schwartzberg; Pat Smith
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Clinical and Functional Outcome of All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at a Minimum of 2 Years' Follow-up.

Authors:  Mark Schurz; Thomas M Tiefenboeck; Markus Winnisch; Stefanie Syre; Fabian Plachel; Gernot Steiner; Stefan Hajdu; Marcus Hofbauer
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Fu; Wei-Cheng Chen; Yung-Chang Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.