| Literature DB >> 35858591 |
Faisel Khan1, Isabel Gonçalves2, Angela C Shore3, Andrea Natali4, Carlo Palombo5, Helen M Colhoun6, Gerd Östling7, Francesco Casanova3, Cecilia Kennbäck7, Kunihiko Aizawa3, Margaretha Persson7, Kim M Gooding3, David Strain3, Helen Looker1, Fiona Dove1, Jill Belch1, Silvia Pinnola4, Elena Venturi4, Michaela Kozakova8, Jan Nilsson9.
Abstract
The factors that influence the atherosclerotic disease process in high-risk individuals remain poorly understood. Here, we used a combination of vascular imaging, risk factor assessment, and biomarkers to identify factors associated with 3-year change in carotid disease severity in a cohort of high-risk subjects treated with preventive therapy (n = 865). The results show that changes in intima-media thickness (IMT) are most pronounced in the carotid bulb. Progression of bulb IMT demonstrates independent associations with baseline bulb IMT, the plaque gray scale median (GSM), and the plasma level of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (standardized β-coefficients and 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.14 [-0.06 to -0.02] p = 0.001, 0.15 [0.02-0.07] p = 0.001, and 0.20 [0.03-0.07] p < 0.001, respectively). Plasma PDGF correlates with the plaque GSM (0.23 [0.15-0.29] p < 0.001). These observations provide insight into the atherosclerotic process in high-risk subjects by showing that progression primarily occurs in fibrotic plaques and is associated with increased levels of PDGF. CrownEntities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; biomarkers; carotid ultrasound; intima-media thickness; risk factors; type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35858591 PMCID: PMC9381367 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Rep Med ISSN: 2666-3791
Baseline clinical characteristics of participants and non-participants in the follow-up imaging study
| Participants (n = 865) | Non-participants (n = 630) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 68.1 ± 8.4 | 66.5 ± 9.7 | 0.001 |
| Gender (% males) | 63.2 | 74.4 | 0.005 |
| Ethnicity (n) white, Indian-Asian, Afro-Caribbean | 860 3 2 | 623 2 2 | |
| Current smokers (%) | 8.0 | 13.8 | 0.001 |
| T2D (%) | 65.4 | 66.5 | 0.54 |
| Prevalent CVD (%) | 40.0 | 58.0 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m−2) | 29.1 ± 4.9 | 29.8 ± 5.2 | 0.006 |
| Medications | |||
| Insulin (%) | 16.6 | 14.5 | 0.32 |
| Statin (%) | 65.8 | 67.9 | 0.30 |
| ACE inhibitors (%) | 36.9 | 40.5 | 0.13 |
| Metformin (%) | 45.9 | 44.9 | 0.78 |
| Betablockers (%) | 31.6 | 38.1 | 0.009 |
| Metabolic factors | |||
| HbA1c (mmol/mmol) | 50.8 ± 14.0 | 52.1 ± 14.9 | 0.08 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.43 ± 0.93 | 2.42 ± 0.90 | 0.76 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.36 ± 0.42 | 1.28 ± 0.37 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.30 (0.94–1.87) | 1.35 (0.85–1.87) | 0.06 |
| Blood pressure | |||
| Systolic (mmHg) | 135 ± 17 | 137 ± 19 | 0.006 |
| Diastolic (mmHg) | 76 ± 9 | 78 ± 10 | <0.001 |
| Renal function | |||
| eGFR (mL/min−1 per 1.73 m2) | 80.1 ± 19.2 | 82.0 ± 22.1 | 0.12 |
Variables with normal distribution are shown as mean ± SD and skewed variables as median and interquartile range. Differences between means of normally distributed continuous variables were assessed with independent sample t tests and between skewed variables with the Mann-Whitney U-test. χ2 test was used for categorical variables. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Figure 1Changes in carotid artery IMT
(A) Ultrasound image of a carotid artery. Bar indicates the border between the CCA and the bulb.
(B and C) Distribution of IMT changes in the carotid bulb and the CCA expressed in (B) mm change and (C) percent change during the study period. Values represent the means of the IMT in the left and right carotid arteries.
(D) Correlations between IMT change in the CCA and the bulb. Correlation was calculated using the Spearman rank test.
(E) Representative ultrasound images of an echolucent and an echogenic plaque. The arrow indicates the luminal surface of the echolucent plaque. Scale bars in (A) and (E) are 5 mm.
Relationships between baseline clinical characteristics with change in bulb IMT
| Mean bulb IMT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | p | Regression n = 191 | No change n = 200 | Progression n = 412 | |
| Age (years) | 0.11 | 0.001 | 67.9 ± 8.3 | 66.6 ± 8.8 | 69.0 ± 8.3 |
| Male gender (%) | 0.14 | 0.0001 | 56.5 | 58.0 | 70.1 |
| Current smokers (%) | 0.11 | 0.02 | 6.3 | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| BMI (kg/m−2) | 0.01 | 0.84 | 29.5 ± 5.0 | 28.2 ± 4.7 | 28.9 ± 4.6 |
| Metabolic factors | |||||
| HbA1c (mmol/mmol) | 0.01 | 0.85 | 48.0 (41.0–60.3) | 47.0 (39.0–57.0) | 48.0 (40.0–60.0) |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 0.10 | 0.007 | 2.28 ± 0.96 | 2.48 ± 0.94 | 2.52 ± 0.90 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | −0.01 | 0.83 | 1.35 ± 0.41 | 1.41 ± 0.45 | 1.37 ± 0.41 |
| TG (mmol/L) | −0.04 | 0.26 | 1.37 (0.97–1.95) | 1.28 (0.88–1.93) | 1.28 (0.96–1.69) |
| Blood pressure | |||||
| Systolic (mmHg) | 0.04 | 0.32 | 137 ± 17 | 131 ± 17 | 136 ± 17 |
| Diastolic (mmHg) | −0.04 | 0.28 | 77 ± 9 | 75 ± 9 | 76 ± 10 |
| Renal function | |||||
| eGFR | 0.03 | 0.36 | 79.5 ± 9.5 | 82.3 ± 16.5 | 79.3 ± 19.8 |
Variables with normal distribution are shown as mean ± standard deviation and skewed variables as median and interquartile range. eGFR: mL/min−1 per 1.73 m2. Correlations are shown as Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Weighted linear trends across IMT change categories (regression, no change, and progression) were calculated with one-way ANOVA and significance of differences versus no change with Scheffe’s post hoc test. Linear trends for categorical variables were calculated using chi-square test. TG, triglycerides.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.05.
Relationships between biomarkers and change in carotid bulb IMT
| Correlation | p | p adjusted | Regression (n = 191) | No change (n = 200) | Progression (n = 412) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory | ||||||
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.28 | 1.40 (0.67–2.90) | 1.16 (0.60–2.54) | 1.30 (0.67–2.69) |
| IL-6 | −0.04 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 47.5 (26.9–64.0) | 31.7 (22.0–50.4) | 33.8 (22.9–52.3) |
| MCP-1 | −0.09 | 0.02 | 0.014 | 13.3 (10.1–17.0) | 11.5 (8.6–15.4) | 11.5 (8.9–14.7) |
| MIP-1α | −0.17 | 4.0 × 10−6 | 6.1 × 10−6 | 4.92 (4.08–6.19) | 4.71 (3.97–5.39) | 4.59 (3.86–5.66) |
| Matrix proteases | ||||||
| MMP-3 | −0.08 | 0.03 | 2.8 × 10−4 | 2.51 (1.91–3.40) | 2.38 (1.90–2.97) | 2.38 (1.91–3.03) |
| MMP-7 | 0.12 | 0.005 | 0.73 | 468 (282–676) | 387 (283–559) | 446 (311–690) |
| MMP-12 | −0.07 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 154 (99–232) | 122 (91–169) | 136 (98–199) |
| Apoptosis | ||||||
| TNFR-1 | −0.07 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 6,608 (5,185–8,192) | 6,039 (5,008–7,473) | 6,295 (5,185–7,643) |
| TRAILR-2 | −0.13 | 3.6 × 10−4 | 0.002 | 3.68 (2.51–4.63) | 3.24 (2.35–4.21) | 3.18 (2.31–4.33) |
| Fas | −0.12 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 226 (177–280) | 197 (168–242) | 198 (167–244) |
| SMC growth factors | ||||||
| PDGF | 0.28 | 1.8 × 10−15 | 5.3 × 10−11 | 70.0 (29.2–166.8) | 132.5 (61.2–246.0) | 174.8 (90.4–263.2) |
| EGF | 0.26 | 3.1 × 10−13 | 8.7 × 10−9 | 35.6 (11.0–73.5) | 51.1 (21.1–116.2) | 67.6 (32.4–121.1) |
| HBEGF | 0.12 | 0.001 | 0.08 | 22.8 (18.9–29.0) | 25.9 (21.0–34.8) | 26.7 (21.6–34.5) |
| EC growth factors | ||||||
| HGF | −0.12 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 121 (93–150) | 101 (83–130) | 103 (87–127) |
| PlGF | −0.15 | 3.3 × 10−6 | 3.0 × 10−6 | 191 (144–246) | 163 (139–202) | 168 (139–207) |
| VEGF | −0.10 | 0.005 | 0.008 | 1,510 (1,193–1,965) | 1,370 (1,097–1,783) | 1,370 (1,097–1,739) |
All biomarkers except hsCRP are expressed as arbitrary units, and values are shown as median and IQR. Correlations are shown as Spearman correlation coefficients. Linear regression models were used to adjust correlations for age, gender, smoking, LDL cholesterol, and baseline carotid bulb IMT (p adjusted). Differences between IMT change categories (regression and progression versus no change) were calculated with one-way ANOVA and Scheffe’s post hoc test. If correcting for multiple comparisons in the present table, the threshold for significance is p < 0.004. EC, endothelial cell; SMC, smooth muscle cell.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.
Relationships between biomarkers and change in common carotid IMT
| Correlation | p | p adjusted | Regression (n = 181) | No change (n = 379) | Progression (n = 299) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory | ||||||
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 1.20 (0.66–2.40) | 1.30 (0.62–2.90) | 1.37 (0.70–2.59) |
| IL-6 | 0.01 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 38.6 (24.3–58.7) | 34.3 (23.0–53.0) | 35.8 (24.3–55.4) |
| MCP-1 | 0.00 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 12.7 (9.4–16.3) | 11.5 (8.9–15.1) | 12.0 (9.0–15.5) |
| MIP-1α | 0.04 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 4.86 (3.86–5.80) | 4.76 (4.00–5.74) | 4.69 (3.95–5.82) |
| Matrix proteases | ||||||
| MMP-3 | −0.03 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 2.59 (2.01–3.16) | 2.33 (1.87–3.04) | 2.46 (1.93–3.23) |
| MMP-7 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 413 (256–676) | 434 (305–650) | 448 (309–657) |
| MMP-12 | −0.02 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 133 (98–202) | 140 (101–201) | 137 (94–205) |
| Apoptosis | ||||||
| TNFR-1 | −0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 6,562 (5,349–8,079) | 6,383 (5,113–7,899) | 6,165 (5,113–7,630) |
| TRAILR-2 | −0.12 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 3.76 (2.86–4.87) | 3.27 (2.22–4.35) | 3.07 (2.45–4.14) |
| Fas | −0.05 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 209 (172–260) | 204 (169–244) | 206 (169–260) |
| SMC growth factors | ||||||
| PDGF | 0.10 | 0.005 | 0.25 | 94.4 (42.6–204.4) | 145.0 (65.3–249.0) | 146.5 (65.8–240.5) |
| EGF | 0.04 | 0.28 | 0.70 | 47.2 (16.7–108.8) | 54.0 (23.3–111.4) | 53.4 (20.4–104.7) |
| HBEGF | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.41 | 24.1 (19.0–32.8) | 25.4 (20.9–32.7) | 25.8 (21.0–33.6) |
| EC growth factors | ||||||
| HGF | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 111 (89–139) | 108 (87–133) | 107 (87–136) |
| PlGF | −0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 184 (146–232) | 171 (142–211) | 169 (139–219) |
| VEGF | −0.02 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 1,468 (1,193–1,820) | 1,448 (1,123–1,820) | 1,389 (1,105–1,758) |
All biomarkers except hsCRP are expressed as arbitrary units, and values are shown as median and IQR. Correlations are shown as Spearman correlation coefficients. Linear regression models were used to adjust correlations for age, gender, smoking, LDL cholesterol, and baseline CCA IMT (p adjusted). Differences between IMT change categories (regression and progression versus no change) were calculated with one-way ANOVA and Scheffe’s post hoc test. If correcting for multiple comparisons in the present table, the threshold for significance is p < 0.004.
p < 0.01.
Relationships between baseline vascular measurements and change in carotid bulb IMT
| Carotid bulb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation | p | p adjusted | Regression | No change | Progression | |
| Mean IMT (mm) | 0.03 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 0.88 (0.80–1.02) | 0.85 (0.76–0.98) | 0.89 (0.7–1.02) |
| Bulb | ||||||
| Mean IMT (mm) | −0.08 | 0.03 | 0.001 | 1.22 (1.01–1.56) | 1.03 (0.88–1.20) | 1.05 (0.89–1.34) |
| GSM baseline | 0.26 | 1.9 × 10−11 | 3.7 × 10−9 | 44 (31–70) | 67 (49–89) | 68 (50–87) |
| GSM follow-up | 0.26 | 4.5 × 10−8 | 0.003 | 53 (38–71) | 67 (54–90) | 72 (50–96) |
| Arterial stiffness | ||||||
| PWV (m/s) | −0.02 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 10.8 (9.2–13.1) | 9.8 (8.5–11.5) | 10.5 (8.8–12.4) |
| Endothelial function | ||||||
| RHI | 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 1.97 (1.68–2.45) | 2.11 (1.66–2.58) | 2.04 (1.65–2.57) |
| Common carotid artery | ||||||
| Mean IMT (mm) | −0.24 | 9.9 × 10−13 | 7.2 × 10−15 | 0.97 (0.85–1.13) | 0.87 (0.77–0.99) | 0.85 (0.74–0.97) |
| Bulb | ||||||
| Mean IMT (mm) | −0.01 | 0.86 | 0.36 | 1.10 (0.93–1.40) | 1.06 (0.91–1.33) | 1.09 (0.92–1.34) |
| GSM baseline | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 53 (37–78) | 65 (45–85) | 65 (44–84) |
| GSM follow-up | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 54 (44–75) | 70 (46–91) | 62 (47–85) |
| Arterial stiffness | ||||||
| PWV (m/s) | −0.10 | 0.007 | 0.37 | 11.1 (9.6–13.3) | 10.1 (8.7–12.4) | 10.3 (8.7–12.1) |
| Endothelial function | ||||||
| RHI | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.43 | 2.04 (1.76–2.53) | 2.13 (1.76–2.62) | 2.16 (1.82–2.67) |
Gray scale median (GSM) value is the median of all gray levels of the pixels in the plaque. Correlations are shown as Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Linear regression models were used to adjust correlations for age, gender, smoking, LDL cholesterol, and baseline CCA or bulb IMT as appropriate (p adjusted). Differences between IMT change categories (regression and progression versus no change) were calculated with one-way ANOVA and Scheffe’s post hoc test. Values are shown as median and IQR. If correcting for multiple comparisons in the present table, the threshold for significance is p < 0.004. PWV, pulse wave velocity; RHI, reactive hyperemia index.
p < 0.001.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.05.
Figure 2Associations between carotid plaque GSM and biomarkers
Scatterplots demonstrating associations between baseline bulb carotid plaque GSM and plasma levels of (A) PDGF, (B) HGF, (C) MIP-1α, and (D) soluble TRAIL receptor-2. Correlations were calculated using the Pearson correlation method. Lnn2 transformed biomarker values were used in the graphs to improve the visibility of associations.
| RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| OLINK CVD 1 panel | OLINK Biosciences | No longer on the market |
| SPSS version 27 | IBM | |
| Endo-PAT | Itamar Medical | |
| SphygmoCor | Actor Medical | |