| Literature DB >> 35857778 |
Jonathan Mnkai1, Thomas F Marandu1,2, Jacklina Mhidze1, Agatha Urio1, Lucas Maganga1, Antelmo Haule1, Godfrey Kavishe1, Elizabeth Ntapara1, Nhamo Chiwerengo1, Petra Clowes1, Sacha Horn3, Maureen Mosoba4, Wilfred Lazarus4, Abdallah Ngenya4, Akili Kalinga4, Alex Debrah5, Friedrich Rieß3,6, Elmar Saathoff3,6, Christof Geldmacher3,6, Achim Hoerauf7,8,9, Michael Hoelscher3,6, Mkunde Chachage1,2,3, Inge Kroidl3,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis is a mosquito transmitted parasitic infection in tropical regions. Annual mass treatment with ivermectin and albendazole is used for transmission control of Wuchereria bancrofti, the infective agent of lymphatic filariasis in many African countries, including Tanzania.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35857778 PMCID: PMC9342735 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Comparison of EMINI participants who were followed up in the RHINO study with those who were lost to follow-up.
| Lost to follow-up | Followed up in RHINO | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| n | 856 | 1299 | |||
|
| 0.6315 | ||||
| female | n (%) | 440 (51.4) | 654 (50.3) | ||
| male | n (%) | 416 (48.6) | 645 (49.7) | ||
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| |||||
| median (IQR) | 17.0 (10.5 to 26.9) | 17.5 (10.1 to 30.9) | 0.2829 | ||
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| |||||
| median (IQR) | 3.3 (1.3 to 6.7) | 3.1 (1.0 to 6.1) | 0.0010 | ||
| missing | n | 49 | 22 | ||
|
| 0.0047 | ||||
| neg. | n (%) | 746 (87.3) | 1182 (91.1) | ||
| pos. | n (%) | 109 (12.7) | 116 (8.9) | ||
| missing | n | 1 | 1 | ||
|
| 0.7792 | ||||
| neg. | n (%) | 632 (73.8) | 952 (73.3) | ||
| pos. | n (%) | 224 (26.2) | 347 (26.7) | ||
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | ||
* p-value for differences between RHINO participants and those lost to follow-up.
** Social economic status (SES). Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables (Age and SES) and chi-squared test for binary variables (all others)
Characteristics of the study population in 2019 (RHINO study).
| all | female | male | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of subjects | |||||
| n | 1299 | 654 | 645 | ||
|
| |||||
| 14 to <25 yrs | n (%) | 530 (40.8) | 247 (37.8) | 283 (43.9) | |
| 25 to <45 yrs | n (%) | 535 (41.2) | 281 (43.0) | 254 (39.4) | |
| 45 to < = 66 yrs | n (%) | 234 (18.0) | 126 (19.3) | 108 (16.7) | |
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| neg. | n (%) | 1123 (86.5) | 537 (82.1) | 586 (90.9) | |
| pos. | n (%) | 176 (13.5) | 117 (17.9) | 59 (9.1) | |
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| neg. | n (%) | 1277 (98.3) | 649 (99.2) | 628 (97.4) | |
| pos. | n (%) | 22 (1.7) | 5 (0.8) | 17 (2.6) | |
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| absent | n (%) | 1287 (99.1) | 647 (98.9) | 640 (99.2) | |
| present | n (%) | 12 (0.9) | 7 (1.1) | 5 (0.8) | |
| missing | n | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||
| absent | n (%) | 626 (98.1) | N/A | 626 (98.1) | |
| present | n (%) | 12 (1.9) | N/A | 12 (1.9) | |
| missing | n | 7 | N/A | 7 | |
Fig 1LF prevalence categorized by sex.
The LF prevalence defined by the level of circulating filarial antigens was measured by Trop Bio ELISA in the two EMINI surveys (2009 and 2010/11) and the RHINO study (2019) in individuals 14 to 65 years in Kyela district. LF prevalence is higher in male compared with female participants in all three surveys.
Fig 2LF prevalence categorized by age group.
The LF prevalence (defined by the level of circulating filarial antigens) is increasing with older age in the two EMINI surveys (2009 and 2010/11) as well as in the RHINO study (2019).
Association of various factors with LF result in 2019 Uni- and multi-variable log-link regression results adjusted for within-household clustering.
| univariable | multivariable | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariate | N | N-pos. | %-pos. | RR | 95% CI | p-value | RR | 95% CI | p-value |
|
| |||||||||
|
| 654 | 5 | 0.76 | 1.00 | - - | - | 1.00 | - - | - |
|
| 645 | 17 | 2.64 | 3.45 | (1.27 to 9.33) | 0.0148 | 3.45 | (1.29 to 9.20) | 0.0133 |
|
| |||||||||
|
| 530 | 2 | 0.38 | 1.00 | - - | - | 1.00 | - - | - |
|
| 535 | 8 | 1.50 | 3.96 | (0.84 to 18.67) | 0.0817 | 1.96 | (0.42 to 9.02) | 0.3894 |
|
| 234 | 12 | 5.13 | 13.59 | (3.03 to 60.95) | 0.0007 | 6.94 | (1.71 to 28.16) | 0.0067 |
|
| |||||||||
|
| 952 | 5 | 0.52 | 1.00 | - - | - | 1.00 | - - | - |
|
| 347 | 17 | 4.90 | 9.33 | (3.48 to 24.98) | <0.0001 | 6.16 | (2.49 to 15.26) | <0.0001 |
N = number of observations; N-pos. = number of positives; %-pos. = percent positive; RR = risk ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.
* reference stratum
Fig 3OD values of the TropBio ELISA of plasma samples from individuals 14 to 65 years of age are shown.
The TropBio ELISA is measuring the circulating filarial antigen of the adult filarial worm. Values above OD 0.35 are considered as positive, with low positive results between OD 0.35 and 0.8, intermediate positive results between OD 0.8 and 1.0, and high positive results above the OD of 1.0. Most filarial infected individuals in 2009 showed high positive results, reflecting a high adult worm burden. In 2019 infected individuals had low positive ODs indicating a low number of adult worms.
Fig 4(A) Mean OD values over time categorized by age group.The OD values declined over time in all age groups. (B) OD values of Trop Bio ELISA from 2009, 2010/11 and 2019 from individuals who tested positive in 2019. Most of the remaining filarial infected individuals in 2019 had a positive result of the TropBio ELISA during the surveys in 2009 or 2010/11. Despite being still positive a significant drop of the OD was noted. Only four individuals had been tested negative before, but showed positive results in 2019.