| Literature DB >> 35857061 |
Ariadne Bosman1, Andrea Palermo2, Julien Vanderhulst3, Suzanne M Jan De Beur4, Seiji Fukumoto5, Salvatore Minisola6, Weibo Xia7, Jean-Jacques Body3, M Carola Zillikens8.
Abstract
Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare and largely underdiagnosed paraneoplastic condition. Previous reviews often reported incomplete data on clinical aspects, diagnosis or prognosis. The aim of this study was to present a systematic clinical review of all published cases of TIO. A search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science from inception until April 23rd, 2020. We selected case reports and case series of patients diagnosed with TIO, with information on tumor localization and serum phosphate concentration. Two reviewers independently extracted data on biochemical and clinical characteristics including bone involvement, tumor localization and treatment. 468 articles with 895 unique TIO cases were included. Median age was 46 years (range 9 months-90 years) and 58.3% were males. Hypophosphatemia and inappropriately low or normal 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels, characteristic for TIO, were present in 98% of cases. Median tumor size was 2.7 cm (range 0.5 to 25.0 cm). Serum fibroblast growth factor 23 was related to tumor size (r = 0.344, P < 0.001). In 32% of the cases the tumor was detected by physical examination. Data on bone phenotype confirmed skeletal involvement: 62% of cases with BMD data had a T-score of the lumbar spine ≤ - 2.5 (n = 61/99) and a fracture was reported in at least 39% of all cases (n = 346/895). Diagnostic delay was longer than 2 years in more than 80% of cases. 10% were reported to be malignant at histology. In conclusion, TIO is a debilitating disease characterized by a long diagnostic delay leading to metabolic disturbances and skeletal impairment. Increasing awareness of TIO should decrease its diagnostic delay and the clinical consequences.Entities:
Keywords: FGF23; Fracture; Hypophosphatemia; Osteomalacia; Rickets; Tumor-induced osteomalacia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35857061 PMCID: PMC9474374 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-022-01005-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Calcif Tissue Int ISSN: 0171-967X Impact factor: 4.000
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the search
Fig. 2Distribution of serum phosphate, 1.25 (OH)2 D levels and the times of the upper limit of normal FGF-23 among adults with TIO. Histograms showing the distribution of serum phosphate in mmol/L (A), serum 1.25(OH)2 Vitamine D in pmol/L (B) and the times of the upper limit of normal of FGF-23 (C). Normal range for serum phosphate: 0.74–1.52 mmol/L. Normal range for serum 1.25(OH)2 Vitamin D: 50–155 pmol/L. FGF-23 Fibroblast growth factor 23, ULN upper limit of normal
Fig. 3Localization of the tumor
Differences between tumors of different sizes in adults
| Tumor < 1.5 cm | Tumor 1.5–3 cm | Tumor 3–5 cm | Tumor > 5 cm | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 63 | 46.0 (21.0, 73.0) | 151 | 46.0 (18.0, 76.0 | 125 | 46.0 (19.0, 73.0) | 54 | 46.0 (18.0, 90.0) | 0.999 |
| Diagnostic delay, years | 53 | 3.0 (0.25, 19.0) | 128 | 3.0 (0.5, 20.0) | 109 | 3.0 (0.17, 27.0) | 48 | 5.5 (0.17, 21.0) | 0.032 |
| Phosphate, mmol/L | 63 | 0.48 (0.23, 0.87) | 151 | 0.48 (0.19, 0.90) | 125 | 0.45 (0.11, 1.03) | 54 | 0.42 (0.16, 0.90) | 0.320 |
| TmP/GFR, mmol/L | 31 | 0.36 (0.09, 1.30) | 72 | 0.39 (0.02, 1.25) | 52 | 0.36 (0.09, 1.50) | 17 | 0.31 (0.11, 0.74) | 0.768 |
| Calcium, mmol/L | 49 | 2.25 (1.10, 2.86) | 106 | 2.28 (2.00, 2.64)) | 88 | 2.26 (1.98, 10.50) | 37 | 2.30 (1.95, 2.70) | 0.146 |
| FGF23 xULN | 24 | 2.53 (0.56, 15.56) | 57 | 2.78 (0.13, 48.67) | 35 | 5.06 (0.28, 139.19) | 12 | 4.66 (1.03, 45.00) | 0.005 |
BMD T-score L1-L4 | 13 | − 2.7 (− 4.5, − 1.3) | 36 | − 3.1 (− 5.9, 0.1) | 12 | − 2.2 (− 4.8, − 1.1) | 10 | − 2.8 (− 6.9, − 1.2)) | 0.861 |
BMD T-score Total hip | 3 | − 2.6 (− 3.9, − 2.5) | 14 | − 2.5 (− 5.0, − 0.8) | 1 | − | 3 | − 2.9 (− 5.9, − 1.2) | 0.936 |
| BMD T-score femoral neck | 6 | − 3.4 (− 5.3, − 0.8) | 19 | − 2.8 (− 4.5, 0.4) | 6 | − 2.8 (− 4.6, − 2.2) | 5 | − 3.0 (− 3.6, − 1.5) | 0.749 |
| Tumor localization | 63 | 151 | 125 | 54 | 0.073 | ||||
| Lower limb | 41 (61.5%) | 78 (51.7%) | 55 (44.0%) | 25 (46.3%) | |||||
| Upper limb | 2 (3.2%) | 7 (4.6%) | 12 (9.6%) | 6 (11.1%) | |||||
| Head/neck | 10 (15.9%) | 39 (25.8%) | 30 (24.0%) | 9 (16.7%) | |||||
| Trunk | 6 (9.5%) | 10 (6.6%) | 12 (9.6%) | 10 (5.6%) | |||||
| Pelvis | 4 (6.3%) | 17 (11.3%) | 15 (12.0%) | 3 (5.6%) | |||||
| Multiple locations | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | 1 (1.9%) | |||||
*Differences between groups were tested using Mann Whitney-U test, Kruskal–Wallis test and chi-square test for homogeneity. Continous data are presented as median (range). Categorical data are presented as count (%)
BMD bone mineral density, FGF23 Fibroblast growth factor 23, TmP/GFR maximum tubular reabsorption rate of phosphate, xULN times the upper limit of normal
Differences between external and internal* tumors in adults
| External | Internal* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 154 | 44.5 (18.0, 79.0) | 307 | 47.0 (18.0, 90.0) | 0.057 |
| Diagnostic delay, years | 141 | 4.0 (0.2, 25.0) | 235 | 3.0 (0.1, 42.0) | 0.055 |
| Tumor size, cm | 105 | 3.0 (0.5, 15.0) | 150 | 2.5 (0.6, 15.0) | < 0.001 |
| Phosphate, mmol/L | 154 | 0.47 (0.11, 1.20) | 307 | 0.45 (0.10, 0.90) | 0.991 |
| Calcium, mmol/L | 115 | 2.30 (1.95, 2.77) | 211 | 2.25 (1.27, 2.90) | 0.070 |
| TmP/GFR, mmol/L | 62 | 0.26 (0.03, 0.74) | 130 | 0.36 (0.02, 1.80) | 0.004 |
| FGF23 ULN | 30 | 3.8 (0.3, 63.0) | 115 | 3.7 (0.3, 62.6) | 0.938 |
| BMD T-score L1-L4 | 19 | − 3.5 (− 5.5, − 0.5) | 38 | − 2.7 (− 5.9, 3.7) | 0.106 |
| BMD T-score total hip | 6 | − 2.7 (− 5.9, − 0.9) | 14 | − 3.3 (− 5.0, − 0.2) | 0.444 |
| BMD T-score femoral neck | 11 | − 3.6 (− 7.4, − 1.7) | 23 | − 2.5 (− 5.3, 1.6) | 0.019 |
| Tumor localization | 154 | 307 | |||
| Lower limb | 108 (35.2%) | 72 (46.8%) | < 0.001 | ||
| Upper limb | 13 (4.2%) | 16 (10.4%) | |||
| Head/neck | 88 (28.7%) | 44 (28.6%) | |||
| Trunk | 49 (16.0%) | 13 (8.4%) | |||
| Pelvis | 45 (14.7%) | 8 (5.2%) | |||
| Multiple locations | 4 (1.3%) | 1 (0.6%) | |||
*Internal tumors were defined as tumors that were not identified at physical examination. † Differences between groups were tested using Mann Whitney-U test, Kruskal–Wallis test and chi-square test for homogeneity. Continuous data are presented as median (range). Categorical data are presented as count (%)
BMD bone mineral density, FGF23 Fibroblast growth factor 23, TmP/GFR maximum tubular reabsorption rate of phosphate, ULN upper limit of normal