| Literature DB >> 35856066 |
Chiara Lazzeri1, Manuela Bonizzoli1, Stefano Batacchi1, Marco Chiostri1, Adriano Peris1.
Abstract
Study objectives: To assess whether echocardiography, systematically performed, could help in risk stratifying patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to SARS-CoV2 (COVID) infection for non invasive ventilation (NIV) failure. Design: Observational single center investigation. Setting: Intensive care unit. Interventions: Echocardiography. Outcome measures: NIV failure. Main results: Seventy-five patients were included in our study. In respect to patients who did not need mechanical ventilation (NIV success), those in the NIV failure subgroup (31 patients, 41 %) were older, with more comorbidities and showed a higher SOFA score and LOS. Higher values of NTpro BNP, CRP and D-dimer were observed in the NIV failure subgroup who exhibited a higher ICU mortality rate. At echocardiographic examination, the NIV failure subgroup showed higher values of RV/LV ratio, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) and lower values of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/SPAP, and PaO2/FiO2. At logistic regression analysis TAPSE/sPAP resulted an independent predictor of NIV failure. At receiving operating characteristic curve analysis, the TAPSE/SPAP cut-off of 0.575 mm/mm Hg showed a sensitivity of 97 % and a specificity of 48 %. Conclusions: Our results documented a marked uncoupling of right ventricular function from the pulmonary circulation (as indicated by TAPSE/sPAP) in COVID-related ARDS treated with non invasive ventilation and the measurement of this parameter, performed on ICU admission, provides independent prognostic relevance for NIV failure.Entities:
Keywords: ARDS; COVID; Echocardiography; Non invasive ventilation; Pulmonary circulation; Right ventricle
Year: 2022 PMID: 35856066 PMCID: PMC9278008 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am Heart J Plus ISSN: 2666-6022
Baseline characteristics of patients.
| Parameter | NIV failure | NIV success | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 31 (41 %) | 44 (59 %) | |
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 70 ± 13 | 60 ± 13 | 0.012 |
| Gender (n, %) | 24 (72 %) | 32 (72 %) | 0.988 (chi square) |
| BMI (mean ± SD) | 30 ± 9 | 28 ± 4 | 0.528 |
| Charlson's index (mean ± SD) | 4.5 ± 3 | 2.6 ± 2 | 0.014 |
| Time from symptoms' onset (days) (mean ± SD) | 6 ± 5 | 5.5 ± 8 | 0.923 |
| SOFA median (IQR) | 6 (3–8) | 2 (1–3.5) | <0.001 |
| Biohumoral data | |||
| Creatinine (mg/dl) (mean ± SD) | 1.31 ± 1 | 0.8 ± 1 | 0.09 |
| Troponin (pg/ml), median (IQR) | 7.5 (20–37) | 7.25 (14–49) | 0.779 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml), median (IQR) | 1155 (396–2364) | 221 (105–1232) | 0.008 |
| CRP (mg/dl), median (IQR) | 138 (96.5–180) | 49 (22–163) | 0.04 |
| D-dimer (ng/ml), median (IQR) | 1950 (978–3738) | 926 (713–1525) | 0.016 |
| Echocardiographic data | |||
| LVEF (%) (mean ± SD) | 58 ± 9 | 60 ± 10 | 0.377 |
| RV/LV (mean ± SD) | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.008 |
| TAPSE (mm) (mean ± SD) | 22 ± 1 | 21 ± 1 | 0.982 |
| SPAP (mm Hg) median (IQR) | 41.5 (22–55) | 40 (38–45) | 0.003 |
| TAPSE/SPAP (mean ± SD) | 0.450 ± 0.099 | 0.542 ± 0.105 | <0.001 |
| P/F median (IQR) | 81.5 (66–103) | 123–5 (110–145) | 0.049 |
BMI: body mass index, ICU: intensive care unit, LOS: length of stay, CRP: C-reactive protein, SOFA: simplified organ functional assessment, NT-pro BNP: N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, sPAP: systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, P/F: PaO2/FiO2 ratio, SD: standard deviation, IQR: interquartile range, (t): Student t-test, KW: Kruskal-Wallis test,
Logistic regression analysis.
| OR | 95 % CI | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.064 | 1.012–1.119 | p = 0.015 |
| TAPSE/SPAP | 0.0463 | 0.227–0.943 | p = 0.034 |
| D-dimer | 1.050 | 1.002–1.100 | p = 0.043 |
| SOFA | 1.03 | 0.942–1.129 | p = 0.508 |
OR: odd ratio, CI: confidence interval, TAPSE/SPAP: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment.
Fig. 1ROC analysis.